On Fri, 2014-07-25 at 16:02 -0700, Martin Buchholz wrote:
> I'm mainly arguing that for most use cases, omitting the
> timestamp wouldn't hurt/would be better.
> Doing this upstream in javadoc seemed to be the most
> future-proof way, as it just flips the default.
>
From: Benedikt Morbach
having those timestamps in there generally isn't that useful and causes
unnecessary differences between builds that you have to cope with, e.g.
if you want to ensure that a binary you got matches the source code.
Some Linux distributions are working on making builds reprod
