On Tue, 3 May 2022 22:47:49 GMT, Jonathan Gibbons wrote:
>> Please review some localized cleanup for the doclint Checker class,
>> primarily focused on upgrading to the use of "enhanced `switch`"
>>
>> The output of one test was changed because of some improvements in one
>> switch statement t
> Please review some localized cleanup for the doclint Checker class, primarily
> focused on upgrading to the use of "enhanced `switch`"
>
> The output of one test was changed because of some improvements in one switch
> statement to eliminate the use of fall-through semantics.
Jonathan Gibbons
On Tue, 3 May 2022 22:06:29 GMT, Pavel Rappo wrote:
>> Jonathan Gibbons has updated the pull request incrementally with one
>> additional commit since the last revision:
>>
>> address review feedback
>
> src/jdk.javadoc/share/classes/jdk/javadoc/internal/doclint/Checker.java line
> 217:
>
>
On Tue, 3 May 2022 22:30:51 GMT, Jonathan Gibbons wrote:
> Yes, but RECORD is handled in a different case, along with METHOD and
> CONSTRUCTOR, because it can have "plain" `@param` as well as type-parameter
> `@param`. In contrast, a class or interface can only have type-parameter
> `@param` a
On Tue, 3 May 2022 22:16:25 GMT, Pavel Rappo wrote:
>> Jonathan Gibbons has updated the pull request incrementally with one
>> additional commit since the last revision:
>>
>> address review feedback
>
> src/jdk.javadoc/share/classes/jdk/javadoc/internal/doclint/Checker.java line
> 866:
>
>
On Tue, 3 May 2022 21:53:21 GMT, Jonathan Gibbons wrote:
>> Please review some localized cleanup for the doclint Checker class,
>> primarily focused on upgrading to the use of "enhanced `switch`"
>>
>> The output of one test was changed because of some improvements in one
>> switch statement t
On Tue, 3 May 2022 21:53:21 GMT, Jonathan Gibbons wrote:
>> Please review some localized cleanup for the doclint Checker class,
>> primarily focused on upgrading to the use of "enhanced `switch`"
>>
>> The output of one test was changed because of some improvements in one
>> switch statement t
> Please review some localized cleanup for the doclint Checker class, primarily
> focused on upgrading to the use of "enhanced `switch`"
>
> The output of one test was changed because of some improvements in one switch
> statement to eliminate the use of fall-through semantics.
Jonathan Gibbons
On Tue, 3 May 2022 11:03:02 GMT, Pavel Rappo wrote:
>> Please review some localized cleanup for the doclint Checker class,
>> primarily focused on upgrading to the use of "enhanced `switch`"
>>
>> The output of one test was changed because of some improvements in one
>> switch statement to eli
On Tue, 3 May 2022 11:31:09 GMT, Pavel Rappo wrote:
>> Please review some localized cleanup for the doclint Checker class,
>> primarily focused on upgrading to the use of "enhanced `switch`"
>>
>> The output of one test was changed because of some improvements in one
>> switch statement to eli
On Fri, 29 Apr 2022 00:29:50 GMT, Jonathan Gibbons wrote:
> Please review some localized cleanup for the doclint Checker class, primarily
> focused on upgrading to the use of "enhanced `switch`"
>
> The output of one test was changed because of some improvements in one switch
> statement to el
On Fri, 29 Apr 2022 00:29:50 GMT, Jonathan Gibbons wrote:
> Please review some localized cleanup for the doclint Checker class, primarily
> focused on upgrading to the use of "enhanced `switch`"
>
> The output of one test was changed because of some improvements in one switch
> statement to el
12 matches
Mail list logo
