This is a conceptually simple change to merge the "Exception" and "Error"
classes into a single "Exception Class" group.
The only change that is not strictly related to the merge is the removal of
unused type subsets and related methods in `TypeElementCatalog.java` and the
use of `Collections.e
On Thu, 21 Oct 2021 09:30:34 GMT, Hannes Wallnöfer wrote:
> This is a conceptually simple change to merge the "Exception" and "Error"
> classes into a single "Exception Class" group.
>
> The only change that is not strictly related to the merge is the removal of
> unused type subsets and relat
On Thu, 21 Oct 2021 11:17:31 GMT, Pavel Rappo wrote:
>> This is a conceptually simple change to merge the "Exception" and "Error"
>> classes into a single "Exception Class" group.
>>
>> The only change that is not strictly related to the merge is the removal of
>> unused type subsets and relat
> This is a conceptually simple change to merge the "Exception" and "Error"
> classes into a single "Exception Class" group.
>
> The only change that is not strictly related to the merge is the removal of
> unused type subsets and related methods in `TypeElementCatalog.java` and the
> use of `C
On Thu, 21 Oct 2021 11:09:10 GMT, Pavel Rappo wrote:
>> Hannes Wallnöfer has updated the pull request incrementally with one
>> additional commit since the last revision:
>>
>> JDK-8269401: Include Throwable in exception classes
>
> src/jdk.javadoc/share/classes/jdk/javadoc/internal/doclets/f
On Tue, 19 Oct 2021 01:26:35 GMT, Jonathan Gibbons wrote:
>> Ichiroh Takiguchi has updated the pull request incrementally with one
>> additional commit since the last revision:
>>
>> 8274544: Langtools command's usage were garbled on Japanese Windows
>
> This is pretty ugly code to be replica
Please review a trivial fix and simple test for DocLint and serializable
records.
Although the original JBS issue was somewhat confused, the underlying cause of
the test case is that `javadoc`/`DocLint` was checking the comments on the
private internal fields, prior to writing the fields in the
On Fri, 22 Oct 2021 00:12:04 GMT, Jonathan Gibbons wrote:
> Please review a trivial fix and simple test for DocLint and serializable
> records.
>
> Although the original JBS issue was somewhat confused, the underlying cause
> of the test case is that `javadoc`/`DocLint` was checking the commen
> Please review a trivial fix and simple test for DocLint and serializable
> records.
>
> Although the original JBS issue was somewhat confused, the underlying cause
> of the test case is that `javadoc`/`DocLint` was checking the comments on the
> private internal fields, prior to writing the f
