les changed: 0 ins; 0 del; 6 mod
8314762: Make {@Incubating} conventional
Reviewed-by: jjg, iris, chegar
-
PR: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/15387
On Tue, 22 Aug 2023 12:19:42 GMT, Pavel Rappo wrote:
> Please review this trivial PR.
LGTM
-
Marked as reviewed by chegar (Reviewer).
PR Review: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/15387#pullrequestreview-1597197292
On Tue, 22 Aug 2023 12:19:42 GMT, Pavel Rappo wrote:
> Please review this trivial PR.
Marked as reviewed by iris (Reviewer).
-
PR Review: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/15387#pullrequestreview-1593932872
On Tue, 22 Aug 2023 12:19:42 GMT, Pavel Rappo wrote:
> Please review this trivial PR.
Marked as reviewed by jjg (Reviewer).
-
PR Review: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/15387#pullrequestreview-1593864766
Please review this trivial PR.
-
Commit messages:
- Initial commit
Changes: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/15387/files
Webrev: https://webrevs.openjdk.org/?repo=jdk&pr=15387&range=00
Issue: https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8314762
Stats: 6 lines in 3 files changed: 0 ins;
I've published a PR to change the name of that tag:
https://github.com/openjdk/jdk/pull/15387
> On 21 Aug 2023, at 10:57, Pavel Rappo wrote:
>
> Does anybody remember why {@Incubating}, a JDK-specific tag introduced in
> JDK-8173354, starts with an uppercase letter? Put
Does anybody remember why {@Incubating}, a JDK-specific tag introduced in
JDK-8173354, starts with an uppercase letter? Put differently, are there any
reasons why we should not make it conform to implicit convention of camelCase,
like all other standard and JDK tags do?
