On Mon, 29 Jul 2024 19:21:55 GMT, Chen Liang wrote:
>> Thanks very much for the reviews.
>
> On a side note, @archiecobbs you can add your openjdk email acobbs at openjdk
> to your github account for github to correctly attribute your commits. (this
> address delegates your jbs email)
@liach -
On Mon, 29 Jul 2024 19:14:40 GMT, Archie Cobbs wrote:
>> The standard Javadoc doclet has a long-standing bug (since 2006, old enough
>> to vote :) whereby constructor type parameters are simply omitted from the
>> output. This results in confusing documentation that look like this:
>>
>> publi
On Thu, 4 Jul 2024 22:32:19 GMT, Archie Cobbs wrote:
> The standard Javadoc doclet has a long-standing bug (since 2006, old enough
> to vote :) whereby constructor type parameters are simply omitted from the
> output. This results in confusing documentation that look like this:
>
> public MyCl
On Thu, 4 Jul 2024 22:32:19 GMT, Archie Cobbs wrote:
> The standard Javadoc doclet has a long-standing bug (since 2006, old enough
> to vote :) whereby constructor type parameters are simply omitted from the
> output. This results in confusing documentation that look like this:
>
> public MyCl
On Thu, 4 Jul 2024 22:32:19 GMT, Archie Cobbs wrote:
> The standard Javadoc doclet has a long-standing bug (since 2006, old enough
> to vote :) whereby constructor type parameters are simply omitted from the
> output. This results in confusing documentation that look like this:
>
> public MyCl
On Mon, 22 Jul 2024 15:08:02 GMT, Archie Cobbs wrote:
>> This needs to be coordinated with @hns who is working on similar issues. He
>> is currently OOTO, but will be back soon.
>
>> This needs to be coordinated with @hns who is working on similar issues. He
>> is currently OOTO, but will be ba
On Mon, 22 Jul 2024 15:08:02 GMT, Archie Cobbs wrote:
>> This needs to be coordinated with @hns who is working on similar issues. He
>> is currently OOTO, but will be back soon.
>
>> This needs to be coordinated with @hns who is working on similar issues. He
>> is currently OOTO, but will be ba
On Tue, 9 Jul 2024 20:16:11 GMT, Jonathan Gibbons wrote:
> This needs to be coordinated with @hns who is working on similar issues. He
> is currently OOTO, but will be back soon.
@hns are you back in town? Any thoughts/comments? Thanks.
-
PR Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pu
On Thu, 4 Jul 2024 22:32:19 GMT, Archie Cobbs wrote:
> The standard Javadoc doclet has a long-standing bug (since 2006, old enough
> to vote :) whereby constructor type parameters are simply omitted from the
> output. This results in confusing documentation that look like this:
>
> public MyCl
On Thu, 4 Jul 2024 22:32:19 GMT, Archie Cobbs wrote:
> The standard Javadoc doclet has a long-standing bug (since 2006, old enough
> to vote :) whereby constructor type parameters are simply omitted from the
> output. This results in confusing documentation that look like this:
>
> public MyCl
On Thu, 4 Jul 2024 22:32:19 GMT, Archie Cobbs wrote:
> The standard Javadoc doclet has a long-standing bug (since 2006, old enough
> to vote :) whereby constructor type parameters are simply omitted from the
> output. This results in confusing documentation that look like this:
>
> public MyCl
11 matches
Mail list logo
