"This thread is hilarious, who thought modularity could be such a
controversial topic." :D
Throwing modules at each other can hurt!
On Sat, Jun 27, 2009 at 1:40 AM, Augusto wrote:
>
> This thread is hilarious, who thought modularity could be such a
> controversial topic.
>
> Somebody mentioned t
Wow - what a report. I really couldn't let this one go by without some
comment.
Some choice pieces from the article:
"defend Jigsaw scathing, cynical, and even insulting comments about
OSGi folks"
>From everything (and I mean everything) I have observed so far, the
scathing comes primarily from
Cross posted from the forked thread about the OSGi vs. Jigsaw vs. The
Java Posse as I believe it effects both discussions.
http://modualrit.blogspot.com/2009/06/jigsaw-posse.html
Wow - what a report. I really couldn't let this one go by without
some
comment.
Some choice pieces from the article:
This thread is hilarious, who thought modularity could be such a
controversial topic.
Somebody mentioned this, it seems the driver here is JavaFX. Making
the VM smaller, and starting faster and that is why this is needed by
Java 7. With that in mind, it seems reasonable that the Sun folks want
to
Whether the proposal supports groovy or not will indicate Dick's true
feelings on the matter!
On Fri, Jun 26, 2009 at 4:11 PM, Joshua Marinacci wrote:
>
> vs the javaposse? the java posse has their own modules proposal?
> awesome! will it support groovy?
>
> On Jun 26, 2009, at 2:24 PM, phil.swe
vs the javaposse? the java posse has their own modules proposal?
awesome! will it support groovy?
On Jun 26, 2009, at 2:24 PM, phil.swen...@gmail.com wrote:
>
> http://modualrit.blogspot.com/2009/06/jigsaw-posse.html
> >
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this
http://modualrit.blogspot.com/2009/06/jigsaw-posse.html
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "The
Java Posse" group.
To post to this group, send email to javaposse@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this
Im actually runnning on solaris x86 so its GTK-based
but my friends running windows and/or linux are also saying its running faster
On Fri, Jun 26, 2009 at 1:13 PM, Viktor Klang wrote:
> Really? I was under the impression that Eclipse was carbon-only and could
> therefore only work with 32-bit
That is the way it works for me on the mac too. I tried a native
application and it worked the same way. It only read the window title
at first. However, as I used the tab key to switch between
components, it began reading them to me. Your little application did
the same thing. So I could get
Really? I was under the impression that Eclipse was carbon-only and could
therefore only work with 32-bit VMs, and since 6.0 was/is 64-bit only we had
to wait for cocoa-based eclipse (SWT)
-- Viktor
On Jun 26, 2009 5:05 PM, "Marcelo Fukushima" wrote:
im guessing all of the versions boot a lot
im guessing all of the versions boot a lot faster than previously - at
least my solaris x86 build (finally officially supported) boots a lot
faster too
On Fri, Jun 26, 2009 at 6:05 AM, Viktor Klang wrote:
> Observation: the 3.5 cocoa version boots ridiculously fast.
>
> On Thu, Jun 25, 2009 at 11
> I disagree and I blame you, too!
Why are people so unkind?
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "The
Java Posse" group.
To post to this group, send email to javaposse@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe fro
Observation: the 3.5 cocoa version boots ridiculously fast.
On Thu, Jun 25, 2009 at 11:33 PM, vogella wrote:
>
> I found it also annoying that the news and noteworthy is so hard to
> find that is why I posted it here.
>
> On 25 Jun., 12:02, d...@happygiraffe.net (Dominic Mitchell) wrote:
> > On
On Jun 25, 2:39 am, phil swenson wrote:
>
> My position is: let the best technology win. I don't see a lot of
> discussion about which approach has the best technology.
Well "best" depends on what criteria you are using to evaluate the
choices. If best means "more features" or "is more mature"
14 matches
Mail list logo
