On Tue, Aug 25, 2009 at 2:51 AM, carljmosca carljmo...@gmail.com wrote:
I believe the problem I was having is a result of my lack of
understanding of maven. While I am still no expect, I believe the
best way to expose multiple classes as web services in a single
project with maven is to use
That's possible (I don't know web services particularly). The normal rule
with maven is one module produces one artifact.
The funny part (at least to me) is I think what I have described is a
fairly common use case for these (now three) plugins which I have
tried but none eludes to or
There's the Eclipse error log you can look at, when I'm having
problems with plugins sometimes exceptions show up there. You can get
to it by going to Help-About Eclipse (at the bottom) - Configuration
Details - View Error Log
On Aug 24, 4:10 pm, Matt mattgrom...@gmail.com wrote:
I don't have
I hope they soon add knowledge of Eclipse's field prefixes so the
@Data class annotation will generate getters/setters without the
prefix.
Right now
class @Data Car
private int fSpeed;
produces
setFSpeed(int)
getFSpeed()
On Aug 24, 4:10 pm, Matt mattgrom...@gmail.com wrote:
I don't have
Also, Lombok is the nickname of a small pepper:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Naga_jolokia
The tag line on the Project Lombok webside is Spice up your java
On Aug 24, 5:27 am, Christian Catchpole christ...@catchpole.net
wrote:
Although walking into Starbucks and ordering a half-caf
I'd second this. A simple servlet environment, with some nifty Google
services mixed in. Directly integrated with eclipse, but you can also
use ant bindings for all the same operations (run local, deploy, etc).
Pat.
On Aug 25, 12:23 am, Mark Derricutt m...@talios.com wrote:
One of the guys
Ah, the wonderful inconsistent world of Java pseudo properties. So
for boolean types, will we generate isFoo() or getFoo() or both?
/Casper
On 25 Aug., 13:34, Steve steve.f.ma...@gmail.com wrote:
I hope they soon add knowledge of Eclipse's field prefixes so the
@Data class annotation will
isFoo() at the moment. If you want getFoo(), knock yourself out and
add it. @Data/@Getter is smart enough to not also generate isFoo() if
you already wrote getFoo(). With sufficient domain knowledge these
inconsistencies are quite managable.
NB: Steve, for those field prefixes, file an issue if
Hmm. Even if we add knowlegde about Eclipse field prefixes, it would
mean that the same file compiled by javac would result in a different
file. Maybe we can have a -D command line parameter for javac and use
the Eclipse setting implicitly.
Is there a reason you are so fond of the field prefix?
If you want to use GAE and Google for Auth, GAELyk is probably the
best framework for a simple app.
On Aug 26, 12:56 am, Patrick Forhan pfor...@gmail.com wrote:
I'd second this. A simple servlet environment, with some nifty Google
services mixed in. Directly integrated with eclipse, but you
Compile this.. (any package you like, or no package at all)
public class Rethrow {
public static void unchecked(Throwable t) {
t=t;
}
}
javap reports the byte code as..
public static void unchecked(java.lang.Throwable);
Code:
Stack=1, Locals=1, Args_size=1
0: aload_0
theres also a throwException(Throwable) in sun.misc.Unsafe - though to
use that you really have to want to
On Wed, Aug 26, 2009 at 12:30 AM, Christian
Catchpolechrist...@catchpole.net wrote:
Compile this.. (any package you like, or no package at all)
public class Rethrow {
public static
Yeah, i was reading about that one. But it's only in the Sun VMs and
probably subject to change.
But hey, I just listed this as an exercise. It just shows the
difference between checked and unchecked is one little byte. :)
On Aug 26, 1:44 pm, Marcelo Fukushima takesh...@gmail.com wrote:
13 matches
Mail list logo
