On Wed, 19 Feb 2003, Boyd Dimmock wrote:
>I have to also say that IANAL, but I think that the CPL license is not
>viral... which is to say, you may take this code and modify it and
>redistribute without making the modifications open source at all. You
>should read carefully the license wordi
To: Jim Miner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [javax-usb-devel] Hello
On Wed, 19 Feb 2003, Jim Miner wrote:
>Hello Javax.usb developers,
>
>I am working on a project involving USB and am evaluating the javax.usb
>packag
Dan Streetman wrote:
On Wed, 19 Feb 2003, Jim Miner wrote:
Hello! Is the OS Windoze? Or QNX? Just curious...
Dan, thanks for getting back to me.
Neither Windoze nor QNX, but judging from your later email you figured
it out.
As far as porting, I'll just say that while IANAL, I believe that
On Wed, 19 Feb 2003, Dan Streetman wrote:
>On Wed, 19 Feb 2003, Jim Miner wrote:
>
>>I am contemplating a port of javax.usb to a non-linux, proprietary OS.
>
>Hello! Is the OS Windoze? Or QNX? Just curious...
Ah wait! I should have guessed (I just noticed your email addr) - is it
IOS or C
On Wed, 19 Feb 2003, Dan Streetman wrote:
>In case you didn't know, you can create them in any of the packages by
>doing "ant docs". They will be located in the docs/jdoc/ directory.
oops, I mean "ant jdoc". You can also get a list of targets by doing
"ant help" or just run ant with no specif
On Wed, 19 Feb 2003, Jim Miner wrote:
>Hello Javax.usb developers,
>
>I am working on a project involving USB and am evaluating the javax.usb
>package. I am contemplating a port of javax.usb to a non-linux,
>proprietary OS. I'm definitely thinking in terms of porting the API
>itself. I have
