Re: [JBoss-dev] Class usage tool

2001-07-26 Thread Chris Kimpton
Hi, I saw some info on JDepend ( http://www.clarkware.com/software/JDepend.html ) which might help with what your trying to do... Chris --- Jason Dillon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Does anyone know of a tool that can show what classes are being used by inspecting a source directory ?

Re: [JBoss-dev] jboss daily test results

2001-07-26 Thread Chris Kimpton
Hi, --- Tobias Frech [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Chris Kimpton wrote: snip Alternatively, there are various bugs in these jdk's/Linux versions that are causing problems... but I am surprised it is showing up so subtlely... Any other ideas on what could be causing it? I must

Re: [JBoss-dev] jboss daily test results

2001-07-26 Thread Chris Kimpton
Hi, Looking at the test results more closely: For the IBM jdk: The jbossmq test just seems to die. The mdb test just dies - but with Interrupted Socket Exception errors - perhaps it does not handle this? The jmsra test and testEJBspec tests complete, but have Interrupted Socket Exception

[JBoss-dev] RE:Class usage tool

2001-07-26 Thread Sanne de Roever
Hi, Poseidon: http://www.gentleware.com/ Does a fairly good job, being free. It generates UML charts of src trees. Regards, S. +++ http://www.newfoundland.nl +++Sanne de Roever Newfoundland Interactive TechnologyJacob van Lennepkade 1871054 ZN AmsterdamTelefoon:

[JBoss-dev] Difficulties with message driven bean

2001-07-26 Thread Tim Fox
I have a simple message driven bean, listening on a queue. When I send a message to the queue, the send happens ok (ok meaning no error messages/exceptions), but the message seems to be disappear into the void. I guess the bean isn't registered on this queue somehow, even though I'm pretty damned

[JBoss-dev] Scoped deployment

2001-07-26 Thread Daniel Cardin
I am posting here because I think this is way off-topic for JBoss-User, I hope I'm not making too big a breach of protocol :-) I've had a look at the discussions regarding scoped deployment. This will prove very useful on large projects like the one I'm currently architecturing. Now... I just

AW: [JBoss-dev] Scoped deployment

2001-07-26 Thread Jung , Dr. Christoph
Check out code from cvs and look at org.jboss.deployment.scope.J2eeGlobalScopeDeployer ... enable the scope deployer by uncommenting the right line in jboss.jcml (and disabling the normal J2eeDeployer) ... build two dependent earĀ“s (I tested with testbean.ear and testbean2.ear from jbosstest

[JBoss-dev] [ jboss-Patches-444844 ] Test for connectionfactory loader.

2001-07-26 Thread noreply
Patches item #444844, was opened at 2001-07-26 09:03 You can respond by visiting: http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376687aid=444844group_id=22866 Category: JBossCX Group: v2.5 Rabbit Hole (unstable) Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: David Jencks (d_jencks)

[JBoss-dev] Transactions and Optimization

2001-07-26 Thread Dan OConnor
Hi guys, I was hoping someone would know where this bug would be as soon as I described the symptoms. A bean-managed entity registers a synchronization object with a transaction. If it is called from a web-tier client with optimizations turned on, it fails like this:

Re: [JBoss-dev] Transactions and Optimization

2001-07-26 Thread Dain Sundstrom
Dan, In org.jboss.ejb.plugins.jrmp.interfaces.GenericProxy we have the following code: protected Object invokeContainer(final Object id, final Method method, final Object[] args) throws Throwable {

RE: [JBoss-dev] Transactions and Optimization

2001-07-26 Thread marc fleury
what version? marcf |-Original Message- |From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] |[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Dan |OConnor |Sent: Thursday, July 26, 2001 12:51 PM |To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] |Subject: [JBoss-dev] Transactions and Optimization | | |Hi guys, | |I was hoping someone would know where

RE: [JBoss-dev] Transactions and Optimization

2001-07-26 Thread Dan OConnor
The problem occurs with 2.2.4-BETA with Tomcat, like you can download from the web site. On 26 Jul 01, at 13:16, marc fleury wrote: what version? marcf |-Original Message- |From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] |[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Dan |OConnor |Sent: Thursday, July 26,

Re: [JBoss-dev] Transactions and Optimization

2001-07-26 Thread Dan OConnor
On 26 Jul 01, at 12:11, Dain Sundstrom wrote: So, it calls getTransaction which will return null if there is no current tx. I think in that case, the tx invocation interceptor creates a new tx. Which would be the expected behavior. I might have to set up Tomcat with my development

Re: [JBoss-dev] Transactions and Optimization

2001-07-26 Thread Dan OConnor
On 26 Jul 01, at 12:11, Dain Sundstrom wrote: So, it calls getTransaction which will return null if there is no current tx. I think in that case, the tx invocation interceptor creates a new tx. Which would be the expected behavior. I might have to set up Tomcat with my development

[JBoss-dev] CVS update: thirdparty/junit/junit - Imported sources

2001-07-26 Thread Jason Dillon
User: user57 Date: 01/07/26 12:46:45 Log: o import of JUnit v3.7 Status: Vendor Tag: junit Release Tags: junit_3_7 N thirdparty/junit/junit/lib/junit.jar No conflicts created by this import ___ Jboss-development

[JBoss-dev] CVS update: thirdparty/apache/log4j - Imported sources

2001-07-26 Thread Jason Dillon
User: user57 Date: 01/07/26 12:51:22 Log: o Import of Apache/Jakarta Log4j v1.1.3 Status: Vendor Tag: apache_jakarta Release Tags: log4j_1_1_3 N thirdparty/apache/log4j/lib/log4j.jar No conflicts created by this import

[JBoss-dev] CVS update: thirdparty/sun/jndi - Imported sources

2001-07-26 Thread Jason Dillon
User: user57 Date: 01/07/26 12:57:06 Log: o Import of JNDI v1.2.1 from Sun. Status: Vendor Tag: sun Release Tags: jndi_1_2_1 N thirdparty/sun/jndi/lib/jndi.jar No conflicts created by this import ___

RE: [JBoss-dev] Transactions and Optimization

2001-07-26 Thread marc fleury
do me a favor and try 2.5 HEAD ... a null tx should not register with the underlying TM if it does it is a bug... marcf |-Original Message- |From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] |[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Dan |OConnor |Sent: Thursday, July 26, 2001 3:20 PM |To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: [JBoss-dev] Transactions and Optimization

2001-07-26 Thread marc fleury
try to get a repro case marcf |-Original Message- |From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] |[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of marc |fleury |Sent: Thursday, July 26, 2001 4:12 PM |To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] |Subject: RE: [JBoss-dev] Transactions and Optimization | | |do me a favor and try 2.5 HEAD ...

[JBoss-dev] CVS update: jnp/etc local.properties-example

2001-07-26 Thread Jason Dillon
User: user57 Date: 01/07/26 14:03:17 Added: etc Tag: jboss_buildmagic local.properties-example Log: o set up initial set integration with buildmagic, still need to hookup project release/install Revision ChangesPath No revision

[JBoss-dev] CVS update: jnp/lib ant.jar crimson.jar javac.jar jaxp.jar

2001-07-26 Thread Jason Dillon
User: user57 Date: 01/07/26 14:03:18 Removed: lib Tag: jboss_buildmagic ant.jar crimson.jar javac.jar jaxp.jar Log: o set up initial set integration with buildmagic, still need to hookup project release/install

[JBoss-dev] CVS update: jnp build build.xml config.xml

2001-07-26 Thread Jason Dillon
User: user57 Date: 01/07/26 14:03:17 Added: .Tag: jboss_buildmagic build build.xml config.xml Log: o set up initial set integration with buildmagic, still need to hookup project release/install Revision ChangesPath No revision

[JBoss-dev] CVS update: jnp/src/etc tests.mf client.mf server.mf jnp.mf

2001-07-26 Thread Jason Dillon
User: user57 Date: 01/07/26 14:03:19 Modified:src/etc Tag: jboss_buildmagic client.mf server.mf Added: src/etc Tag: jboss_buildmagic tests.mf Removed: src/etc Tag: jboss_buildmagic jnp.mf Log: o set up initial set integration with buildmagic, still need to

[JBoss-dev] CVS update: jnp/src/build build.bat build.sh build.xml

2001-07-26 Thread Jason Dillon
User: user57 Date: 01/07/26 14:03:18 Removed: src/build Tag: jboss_buildmagic build.bat build.sh build.xml Log: o set up initial set integration with buildmagic, still need to hookup project release/install ___ Jboss-development

[JBoss-dev] CVS update: jboss-j2ee build.xml

2001-07-26 Thread Jason Dillon
User: user57 Date: 01/07/26 14:04:22 Modified:.Tag: jboss_buildmagic build.xml Log: o removed the buildmagic echo o updated task jar (which contains task defaults) o added naming to the module list Revision ChangesPath No revision

[JBoss-dev] CVS update: build build.xml config.xml

2001-07-26 Thread Jason Dillon
User: user57 Date: 01/07/26 14:04:22 Modified:.Tag: jboss_buildmagic build.xml config.xml Log: o removed the buildmagic echo o updated task jar (which contains task defaults) o added naming to the module list Revision ChangesPath No

[JBoss-dev] CVS update: tools/planet57/buildmagic/lib buildmagic-tasks.jar

2001-07-26 Thread Jason Dillon
User: user57 Date: 01/07/26 14:04:22 Modified:planet57/buildmagic/lib Tag: jboss_buildmagic buildmagic-tasks.jar Log: o removed the buildmagic echo o updated task jar (which contains task defaults) o added naming to the module list Revision

[JBoss-dev] [ jboss-Feature Requests-444937 ] Separate Install and Config dir

2001-07-26 Thread noreply
Feature Requests item #444937, was opened at 2001-07-26 14:10 You can respond by visiting: http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376688aid=444937group_id=22866 Category: None Group: None Status: Open Priority: 5 Submitted By: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous

[JBoss-dev] CVS update: jboss/src/main/org/jboss/ejb/plugins/jaws/jdbc JDBCFindEntitiesCommand.java JDBCFindEntityCommand.java

2001-07-26 Thread Dain Sundstrom
User: dsundstrom Date: 01/07/26 14:54:14 Modified:src/main/org/jboss/ejb/plugins/jaws/jdbc JDBCFindEntitiesCommand.java JDBCFindEntityCommand.java Log: Changed finders to allow application exceptions to be passed back to clients

[JBoss-dev] CVS update: jboss/src/main/org/jboss/ejb/plugins/cmp CMPStoreManager.java FindEntitiesCommand.java FindEntityCommand.java

2001-07-26 Thread Dain Sundstrom
User: dsundstrom Date: 01/07/26 14:54:13 Modified:src/main/org/jboss/ejb/plugins/cmp CMPStoreManager.java FindEntitiesCommand.java FindEntityCommand.java Log: Changed finders to allow application exceptions to be passed back to clients instead of being

[JBoss-dev] CVS update: jboss/src/main/org/jboss/ejb/plugins/jaws/bmp CustomFindByEntitiesCommand.java

2001-07-26 Thread Dain Sundstrom
User: dsundstrom Date: 01/07/26 14:54:14 Modified:src/main/org/jboss/ejb/plugins/jaws/bmp CustomFindByEntitiesCommand.java Log: Changed finders to allow application exceptions to be passed back to clients instead of being wrapped in a FinderException.

[JBoss-dev] CVS update: jboss/src/main/org/jboss/ejb/plugins/cmp/bmp CustomFindByEntitiesCommand.java

2001-07-26 Thread Dain Sundstrom
User: dsundstrom Date: 01/07/26 14:54:13 Modified:src/main/org/jboss/ejb/plugins/cmp/bmp CustomFindByEntitiesCommand.java Log: Changed finders to allow application exceptions to be passed back to clients instead of being wrapped in a FinderException. This

[JBoss-dev] CVS update: jboss/src/main/org/jboss/ejb/plugins/jaws JAWSPersistenceManager.java JPMFindEntitiesCommand.java JPMFindEntityCommand.java

2001-07-26 Thread Dain Sundstrom
User: dsundstrom Date: 01/07/26 14:54:14 Modified:src/main/org/jboss/ejb/plugins/jaws JAWSPersistenceManager.java JPMFindEntitiesCommand.java JPMFindEntityCommand.java Log: Changed finders to allow application

[JBoss-dev] CVS update: jboss/src/main/org/jboss/ejb/plugins/cmp/jdbc JDBCFindEntitiesCommand.java JDBCFindEntityCommand.java

2001-07-26 Thread Dain Sundstrom
User: dsundstrom Date: 01/07/26 14:54:14 Modified:src/main/org/jboss/ejb/plugins/cmp/jdbc JDBCFindEntitiesCommand.java JDBCFindEntityCommand.java Log: Changed finders to allow application exceptions to be passed back to clients

Re: [JBoss-dev] jboss daily test results

2001-07-26 Thread Jason Dillon
One of the reasons I am using the blackdown JDK is that it has a green threads option - which I am using - which should eliminate any thread limit issues - but it is also showing a low count on the tests. What are the thread limit issues? I must look at tinderbox some more - this would

[JBoss-dev] CVS update: jboss/src/main/org/jboss/metadata QueryMetaData.java

2001-07-26 Thread Dain Sundstrom
User: dsundstrom Date: 01/07/26 15:09:41 Modified:src/main/org/jboss/metadata QueryMetaData.java Log: Applied patch 444395. This fixes a bug where the optional element method-intf was required. Revision ChangesPath 1.2 +2 -3

[JBoss-dev] CVS update: jboss/src/main/org/jboss/ejb/plugins/cmp/jdbc/metadata JDBCQueryMetaDataFactory.java

2001-07-26 Thread Dain Sundstrom
User: dsundstrom Date: 01/07/26 15:24:29 Modified:src/main/org/jboss/ejb/plugins/cmp/jdbc/metadata JDBCQueryMetaDataFactory.java Log: Applied patch 22. This fixes a bug where it was assumed that a bean always had a home and local home interface, which

[JBoss-dev] CVS update: CVSROOT modules

2001-07-26 Thread Jason Dillon
User: user57 Date: 01/07/26 15:24:54 Modified:.modules Log: o added server and pool to jboss-all-modules Revision ChangesPath 1.15 +3 -4 CVSROOT/modules Index: modules === RCS

[JBoss-dev] CVS update: CVSROOT modules

2001-07-26 Thread Jason Dillon
User: user57 Date: 01/07/26 15:25:09 Modified:.modules Log: o removed extra \ Revision ChangesPath 1.16 +1 -1 CVSROOT/modules Index: modules === RCS file:

Re: [JBoss-dev] jboss daily test results

2001-07-26 Thread Dain Sundstrom
You know the philosophy scratch your own itch. SF is open source. - Original Message - From: Jason Dillon [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, July 26, 2001 5:15 PM Subject: Re: [JBoss-dev] jboss daily test results The SF people are very resonable and would most

[JBoss-dev] cvs module dependencies

2001-07-26 Thread Jason Dillon
I am working on a build system proof of concept, that integrates cvs modules as sources instead of binaries. Things are going well, but I have run into a few module dependency issues. Currently there is only one that is causing a problem. There is a circular dependency between jboss and

Re: [JBoss-dev] cvs module dependencies

2001-07-26 Thread Toby Allsopp
On Thu, Jul 26, 2001 at 03:42:09PM -0700, Jason Dillon wrote: I am working on a build system proof of concept, that integrates cvs modules as sources instead of binaries. Things are going well, but I have run into a few module dependency issues. Currently there is only one that is causing a

[JBoss-dev] CVS update: jbossmq/src/main/org/jbossmq/server JMSServer.java JMSDestination.java

2001-07-26 Thread Hiram Chirino
User: chirino Date: 01/07/26 15:54:08 Modified:src/main/org/jbossmq/server JMSServer.java JMSDestination.java Log: no message Revision ChangesPath 1.14 +2 -1 jbossmq/src/main/org/jbossmq/server/JMSServer.java Index: JMSServer.java

[JBoss-dev] CVS update: thirdparty/sun/jmx - Imported sources

2001-07-26 Thread Jason Dillon
User: user57 Date: 01/07/26 16:09:54 Log: o Import of JMX v1.0 ri from Sun. Status: Vendor Tag: sun Release Tags: jmx_1_0_ri N thirdparty/sun/jmx/lib/jmxgrinder.jar N thirdparty/sun/jmx/lib/jmxri.jar N thirdparty/sun/jmx/lib/jmxtools.jar No conflicts

[JBoss-dev] CVS update: jboss/etc - New directory

2001-07-26 Thread Jason Dillon
User: user57 Date: 01/07/26 16:15:10 jboss/etc - New directory ___ Jboss-development mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development

[JBoss-dev] CVS update: jbosspool/src/main/org/jboss/jdbc - New directory

2001-07-26 Thread Jason Dillon
User: user57 Date: 01/07/26 16:07:38 jbosspool/src/main/org/jboss/jdbc - New directory ___ Jboss-development mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development

Re: [JBoss-dev] Status of current jbossmq module

2001-07-26 Thread Hiram Chirino
Ok I think I just fixed one of the threading issues JBossMQ was having that caused lockups.. Problem was that on a heavy load, all the threads in the server thread pool get busy, and the pool has a limit of 25 threads. I the pool WAS setup so that the execution of a new task would block

[JBoss-dev] CVS update: thirdparty/sun/jaxp - Imported sources

2001-07-26 Thread Jason Dillon
User: user57 Date: 01/07/26 16:23:22 Log: o Import of JAXP v1.1 from Sun. Status: Vendor Tag: sun Release Tags: jaxp_1_1 N thirdparty/sun/jaxp/lib/crimson.jar N thirdparty/sun/jaxp/lib/jaxp.jar N thirdparty/sun/jaxp/lib/xalan.jar No conflicts created by

[JBoss-dev] CVS update: thirdparty/oswego/concurrent - Imported sources

2001-07-26 Thread Jason Dillon
User: user57 Date: 01/07/26 16:42:39 Log: o import of util.concurrent v1.3.0 from Oswego/Doug Lea. Status: Vendor Tag: oswego Release Tags: concurrent_1_3_0 N thirdparty/oswego/concurrent/lib/concurrent.jar No conflicts created by this import

[JBoss-dev] CVS update: thirdparty/sun/javamail - Imported sources

2001-07-26 Thread Jason Dillon
User: user57 Date: 01/07/26 16:54:46 Log: o Import of JavaMail v1.2 from Sun. Status: Vendor Tag: sun Release Tags: javamail_1_2 N thirdparty/sun/javamail/lib/imap.jar N thirdparty/sun/javamail/lib/mailapi.jar N thirdparty/sun/javamail/lib/mail.jar N

[JBoss-dev] CVS update: jboss/src/main/org/jboss/jdbc InstantDBDatabase.java

2001-07-26 Thread Jason Dillon
User: user57 Date: 01/07/26 16:49:47 Modified:src/main/org/jboss/jdbc Tag: jboss_buildmagic InstantDBDatabase.java Log: o removed import org.hsql.Server, since this is for InstantDB. Revision ChangesPath No revision

[JBoss-dev] How to run the latest jbossmq

2001-07-26 Thread Brian Sondergaard
I'm trying to run the latest jbossmq. I brought down the code and everything built fine, but when I try to combine this with the latest JBoss, I run into what appears to be configuration troubles. I've studied closely the changes to the JBossMQ config, but I must be overlooking something.

[JBoss-dev] CVS update: thirdparty/gjt/jpl-util - Imported sources

2001-07-26 Thread Jason Dillon
User: user57 Date: 01/07/26 17:18:24 Log: o Import of jpl-util v0.5b (taken from jboss/src/lib) Status: Vendor Tag: gjt Release Tags: jpl_util_0_5_b N thirdparty/gjt/jpl-util/lib/jpl-util.jar No conflicts created by this import

Re: [JBoss-dev] cvs module dependencies

2001-07-26 Thread David Jencks
Hi, I'm working on this rewriting. Should I change the package?? Seems like no, these are going to be sort of deprecated anyway, only there for backwards compatibility, so we should keep the package the same. Agreed? Thanks david jencks On 2001.07.26 18:48:54 -0400 Toby Allsopp wrote: On

Re: [JBoss-dev] Transactions and Optimization

2001-07-26 Thread Ole Husgaard
Hi, Strange, this should only happen if you are holding on to a Transaction reference, and that transaction was terminated (committed or rolled back). For more information about what is going on in the default TM, change the trace flag near the top of org.jboss.tm.TxCapsule to true, and

Re: [JBoss-dev] cvs module dependencies

2001-07-26 Thread Toby Allsopp
On Thu, Jul 26, 2001 at 08:48:14PM -0400, David Jencks wrote: Hi, I'm working on this rewriting. Should I change the package?? Seems like no, these are going to be sort of deprecated anyway, only there for backwards compatibility, so we should keep the package the same. Agreed? Agreed.

[JBoss-dev] jboss daily test results

2001-07-26 Thread chris
JBoss daily test results SUMMARY Number of tests run: 136 Successful tests: 133 Errors:0 Failures: 3 [time of test: 27 July 2001 3:2 GMT] [java.version: 1.3.0]

[JBoss-dev] jboss daily test results

2001-07-26 Thread chris
JBoss daily test results SUMMARY Number of tests run: 133 Successful tests: 133 Errors:0 Failures: 0 [time of test: 27 July 2001 3:26 GMT] [java.version: 1.3.1]

[JBoss-dev] jboss daily test results

2001-07-26 Thread chris
JBoss daily test results SUMMARY Number of tests run: 59 Successful tests: 59 Errors:0 Failures: 0 [time of test: 27 July 2001 4:37 GMT] [java.version: 1.3.1]

[JBoss-dev] CVS update: jbosssx/src/main/org/jboss/security/plugins JaasSecurityManager.java JaasSecurityManagerService.java

2001-07-26 Thread Scott M Stark
User: starksm Date: 01/07/26 20:38:32 Modified:src/main/org/jboss/security/plugins Tag: Branch_2_4 JaasSecurityManager.java JaasSecurityManagerService.java Log: Update to use log4j Revision ChangesPath No

[JBoss-dev] CVS update: contrib/tomcat/src/main/org/jboss/tomcat/security JBossSecurityMgrRealm.java

2001-07-26 Thread Scott M Stark
User: starksm Date: 01/07/26 20:51:33 Modified:tomcat/src/main/org/jboss/tomcat/security Tag: Branch_2_4 JBossSecurityMgrRealm.java Log: Clear any SecurityAssociation value at the end of the service call to ensure that reuse of the thread with unsecure

[JBoss-dev] CVS update: contrib/tomcat/src/build build.xml

2001-07-26 Thread Scott M Stark
User: starksm Date: 01/07/26 20:51:33 Modified:tomcat/src/build Tag: Branch_2_4 build.xml Log: Clear any SecurityAssociation value at the end of the service call to ensure that reuse of the thread with unsecure content does not allow access to components it should not

[JBoss-dev] CVS update: jboss/src/lib jboss-jaas.jar jbosssx.jar tomcat-service.jar

2001-07-26 Thread Scott M Stark
User: starksm Date: 01/07/26 21:10:00 Modified:src/lib Tag: Branch_2_4 jboss-jaas.jar jbosssx.jar tomcat-service.jar Log: Integrate the JBossSX and Tomcat service changes in Rel_2_4_0_25 Revision ChangesPath No revision

[JBoss-dev] CVS update: contrib/tomcat/src/main/org/jboss/tomcat/security JBossSecurityMgrRealm.java

2001-07-26 Thread Scott M Stark
User: starksm Date: 01/07/26 21:16:01 Modified:tomcat/src/main/org/jboss/tomcat/security JBossSecurityMgrRealm.java Log: Clear any SecurityAssociation value at the end of the service call to ensure that reuse of the thread with unsecure content does not

[JBoss-dev] CVS update: jboss/src/lib jbosssx.jar

2001-07-26 Thread Scott M Stark
User: starksm Date: 01/07/26 21:19:55 Modified:src/lib jbosssx.jar Log: Integrate the JaasSecurityManager changes Revision ChangesPath 1.16 +55 -42jboss/src/lib/jbosssx.jar Binary file ___

Re: [JBoss-dev] Transactions and Optimization

2001-07-26 Thread Dan OConnor
On 27 Jul 01, at 3:32, Ole Husgaard wrote: Hi, Strange, this should only happen if you are holding on to a Transaction reference, and that transaction was terminated (committed or rolled back). Hi Ole, This is certainly a possible defect in my application, but if this is the cause,

RE: [JBoss-dev] Transactions and Optimization

2001-07-26 Thread Dan OConnor
Sorry, I'm an idiot. 2.4-BETA. I'll try to figure this out first thing tomorrow. -Dan On 26 Jul 01, at 15:01, Dan OConnor wrote: The problem occurs with 2.2.4-BETA with Tomcat, like you can download from the web site. On 26 Jul 01, at 13:16, marc fleury wrote: what version?

Re: [JBoss-dev] cvs module dependencies

2001-07-26 Thread Jason Dillon
I would leave it for the moment... Unless you are talking about integration into the jbosscx module. --jason On Thu, 26 Jul 2001, David Jencks wrote: Hi, I'm working on this rewriting. Should I change the package?? Seems like no, these are going to be sort of deprecated anyway, only there