JBoss daily test results
SUMMARY
Number of tests run: 17
Successful tests: 15
Errors:2
Failures: 0
[time of test: 19 September 2001 7:44 GMT]
[java.version:
I've receives this worm attack (below without the infectious attachments !)
through the jbossCMP mailing list.
It tries to execute a .exe, when you preview the message,
even if you open no attachment at all...
please beware this is a well known worm
http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
exploiting a
09/19/2001 10:51:18 - InterScan a detecte un virus TROJ_NIMDA.A dans le fichier
readme.exe dans un mail de [EMAIL PROTECTED] vous etant adresse; pour
votre securite, le fichier a ete intercepte (Action : quarantined.). Vos autres
fichiers sont a priori sains.
I've receives this worm attack (below without the infectious attachments !)
through the jbossCMP mailing list.
It tries to execute a .exe, when you preview the message,
even if you open no attachment at all...
please beware this is a well known worm
http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
exploiting a
JBoss daily test results
SUMMARY
Number of tests run: 17
Successful tests: 15
Errors:2
Failures: 0
[time of test: 19 September 2001 12:53 GMT]
[java.version:
Hi!
The same goes for me - the training is a real success :-)
To refer to Edwards mail i think that it would be good to have some presentation
material from JBoss downloadable, because it is quite often that you have to hold a
short presentation of JBoss and its features and why it is a good
Can you give a simple test case? I'll look into this.
Bill
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Todd
Huss
Sent: Tuesday, September 18, 2001 8:16 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [JBoss-dev] RequiresNew Locking Bug in JBoss 2.4.1
I
MethodOnlyLock is there, but the read-only special case has not been put in
yet.
But,
You can use the entity instance per transaction interceptors I wrote.
Unfortunately there is a stupid bug in them in the 2.4.1 release, but you
can get latest from the CVS Branch_2_4 to get my fixes.
With
JBoss website is
down
JBoss daily test results
SUMMARY
Number of tests run: 17
Successful tests: 15
Errors:2
Failures: 0
[time of test: 19 September 2001 17:56 GMT]
[java.version:
Scott M Stark wrote:
I looked at integrating the catalina final release with integrated
security and JNDI and I find that everything works except for optimized
EJB calls.
Did you use the updated Catalina support that I've added?
/Rickard
--
Rickard Öberg
Software Development Specialist
Yes as the standardjboss.xml descriptor HAS to be correct as this defines
every EJB containers behavior.
- Original Message -
From: Todd Huss [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: Bill Burke [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, September 19, 2001 9:47 AM
Subject: RE: [JBoss-dev]
I can take a look at it tomorrow (except if someone wants to correct this
before)
-Message d'origine-
De : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]De la part de
Scott M Stark
Envoyé : mercredi, 19 septembre 2001 19:15
À : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Objet : [JBoss-dev] Re: [JBoss-user]
In the new locking code, how can one see when a LOCKING-WAITING
type of situation occurs?
I like to run our system through a stress test every now and again and see
which beans are being regularly blocked on. In 2.4.0 I would set the
loglevel to DEBUG in log4j and then I could see the
In the new locking code, how can one see when a LOCKING-WAITING
type of situation occurs?
I like to run our system through a stress test every now and again and see
which beans are being regularly blocked on. In 2.4.0 I would set the
loglevel to DEBUG in log4j and then I could see the
Bill,
Since there is little documentation regarding locking, can you clear up a
question?
Don't take this as a slam. All of the major commercial vendors have
discovered that it is problematic to perform serialization of client access
to EJB's in the container. [We can expound upon this, if you
Hi, I am not sure, but looking in the EJB spec (draft version), for two
times it specifically forbid the optimized EJB calls made in JBoss. Citing
the draft:
quote
The enterprise beans remote home and remote interfaces are remote
interfaces in the Java RMI sense.
The Container must ensure the
Anyone has the xxx-service.xml for a database that is not enhydra?
I have coded one, but doesn't work. It could be a bug but since I'm not 100%
sure of the config parameters I don't dare to post it as a bug yet.
-Mensaje original-
De: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]En
User: schaefera
Date: 01/09/19 10:55:05
Modified:src/main/org/jboss/jmx/connector/notification
JMSClientNotificationListener.java
JMSNotificationListener.java
RMINotificationListener.java
Log:
Some small fixes.
User: schaefera
Date: 01/09/19 10:55:05
Modified:src/main/org/jboss/jmx/adaptor/ejb EJBAdaptorBean.java
Log:
Some small fixes.
Revision ChangesPath
1.3 +24 -17jboss/src/main/org/jboss/jmx/adaptor/ejb/EJBAdaptorBean.java
Index: EJBAdaptorBean.java
User: schaefera
Date: 01/09/19 10:55:05
Modified:src/main/org/jboss/jmx/connector/ejb EJBConnector.java
Log:
Some small fixes.
Revision ChangesPath
1.4 +24 -13jboss/src/main/org/jboss/jmx/connector/ejb/EJBConnector.java
Index: EJBConnector.java
Yes, and you can turn off optimization if you want. Call
the JBoss optmization automatic local interfaces and were
ahead of the 2.0 curve.
- Original Message -
From: Ignacio Coloma [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, September 19, 2001 10:22 AM
Subject: RE:
On Wed, Sep 19, 2001 at 06:22:18PM +0100, Ignacio Coloma wrote:
Hi, I am not sure, but looking in the EJB spec (draft version), for two
times it specifically forbid the optimized EJB calls made in JBoss. Citing
the draft:
You can turn the optimization off. Most container vendors implement
Jim,
I'm in total agreement here. Serialized access is really only good for
synchronized caching.
Yes, for commit option 'B' and 'C' there is a way to duplicate instances of
entity beans. Unfortunately, this code has a major bug in it so you would
have to go to CVS and get latest from
Hey Sacha,
Can you make this configurable in AbstractInstancePool? I set up a flag to
enable entity pooling, but I didn't look at the implementation of
AbstractInstancePool to find out that pooling has been turned off totally.
Bill
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
User: gropi
Date: 01/09/19 11:38:23
Modified:src/xdocs basicconfiguration.xml
Log:
Revised version by Fernando Garcia-Loygorri.
Revision ChangesPath
1.2 +703 -307 manual/src/xdocs/basicconfiguration.xml
Index: basicconfiguration.xml
Correct.
- Original Message -
From: Hunter Hillegas [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: JBoss Dev [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, September 19, 2001 11:34 AM
Subject: Re: [JBoss-dev] Optimized EJB calls in catalina
So all you have to do is not include the EJB interfaces in your WAR?
From:
Just a note, but it looks like there is still a problem with MDB tx timeouts
with a non-xa connection factory. I mentioned this problem a while ago,
then the world fell apart, then my computers freaked out and then I got ill.
Now, I have recomved from 2 of the 3 and am looking into this problem
User: d_jencks
Date: 01/09/19 12:16:54
Modified:src/main/org/jboss/test/cts/test
StatelessSessionStressTestCase.java
Log:
Changed stress tests to have counts set from build.xml. You may set values in a
local.properties file.
Revision ChangesPath
User: d_jencks
Date: 01/09/19 12:16:54
Modified:src/main/org/jboss/test/lock/test EnterpriseEntityTest.java
Log:
Changed stress tests to have counts set from build.xml. You may set values in a
local.properties file.
Revision ChangesPath
1.6 +8 -17
User: d_jencks
Date: 01/09/19 12:16:54
Modified:src/main/org/jboss/test/hello/test
HelloTimingStressTestCase.java
Log:
Changed stress tests to have counts set from build.xml. You may set values in a
local.properties file.
Revision ChangesPath
User: d_jencks
Date: 01/09/19 12:16:54
Modified:src/main/org/jboss/test/bank/test BankStressTestCase.java
Log:
Changed stress tests to have counts set from build.xml. You may set values in a
local.properties file.
Revision ChangesPath
1.4 +20 -20
User: d_jencks
Date: 01/09/19 12:16:54
Modified:src/main/org/jboss/test JBossTestCase.java
JBossTestServices.java JBossTestSetup.java
Log:
Changed stress tests to have counts set from build.xml. You may set values in a
local.properties file.
Revision
User: d_jencks
Date: 01/09/19 12:16:54
Modified:src/main/org/jboss/test/perf/test PerfStressTestCase.java
SecurePerfStressTestCase.java Setup.java
Log:
Changed stress tests to have counts set from build.xml. You may set values in a
local.properties file.
User: d_jencks
Date: 01/09/19 12:16:54
Modified:src/main/org/jboss/test/jbossmq/perf
JBossMQPerfStressTestCase.java
Log:
Changed stress tests to have counts set from build.xml. You may set values in a
local.properties file.
Revision ChangesPath
Hi,
It appears that most of the jbossmq tests are not working currently with
rh. Much of this appears to me to be configuration problems. On my
machine, running JBossMQPerfStressTestCase usually freezes something so
that subsequent tests don't run and jboss will not shut down: for this
reason
I'll have a look, I've been through the MQ test stuff before and it did all
work originally. I haven't looked at it since all the changes to the build
system and new test stuff so its not too surprising if its having trouble.
I'll let you know how I get on.
David
-Original Message-
I've been looking at how to include virtual hosts for wars, ejbs and rars
that need to bind their exported interfaces to specific addresses. Also
needed
is a notion of a security domain for the KeyStore if you need to use SSL/TLS
with
the exported transport. The security domain could also be used
I am working on packaging up the Jetty service into an archive.
I have some questions...
1. Should I call it a SAR or a JSR ?
2. should I deploy it to ./deploy or ./deploy/lib ?
3. Can I include jars in it (I tried top level dir and META-INF/lib -
no joy) - how ?
4. Should Jetty's
Hi Julian,
Most of your problems are coming from the fact that service deployment has
only really been half done, there are several issues directly relating to
your comments below that need to be sorted out.
Briefly then...
I am working on packaging up the Jetty service into an archive.
I
Hi,
This is great!
I have some questions...
As I understand it a virtual host is an ip address (+ port?)
A security domain is an authentication/authorization mechanism (instance),
and something is within a security domain if it uses that instance for its
authentication/authorization.
In your
User: dmaplesden
Date: 01/09/19 15:45:23
Modified:src/main/org/jboss/test/jbossmq/test
JBossMQUnitTestCase.java
Log:
added additional simple tests
Revision ChangesPath
1.3 +221 -10
hi jason,
On Wed, 2001-09-19 at 21:10, Jason Dillon wrote:
Just a note, but it looks like there is still a problem with MDB tx timeouts
with a non-xa connection factory. I mentioned this problem a while ago,
then the world fell apart, then my computers freaked out and then I got ill.
Now,
User: dmaplesden
Date: 01/09/19 15:44:50
Modified:.build.xml
Log:
change one-test target to find tests in 'perf' directories as well
Revision ChangesPath
1.30 +2 -1 jbosstest/build.xml
Index: build.xml
I've been seeing something like this too, could you send it to me also?
I think there may be a problem with the URLClassloaders getting stuck if
they have a startup problem and then you can never get rid of them. Will
try to look soon.
Thanks
david jencks
On 2001.09.19 17:38:53 -0400 Julian
Hi,
If i try to build jboss-all
i get various of compiler-errors
what can i do to help resolve this (i think classpath problems)
Greetz-Tbone
output follows:
compile-classes:
[unjar] Expanding: C:\sandbox\jboss-all\thirdparty\sun\jaas\lib\jaas.jar
into
Ok I have had a look at the mq tests and they run fine for me, I didn't have
any trouble.
The only thing I changed was to use the rollinglogged persistence manager
instead of the file persistence manager for JBossMQ. This shouldn't change
anything except the performance (rolling logged is
How did you start the build? From jboss-all/security or jboss-all/build?
--jason
On Thu, 20 Sep 2001, Philip Van Bogaert wrote:
Hi,
If i try to build jboss-all
i get various of compiler-errors
what can i do to help resolve this (i think classpath problems)
Greetz-Tbone
output
User: sparre
Date: 01/09/19 16:29:04
Modified:src/main/javax/transaction/xa XAException.java
XAResource.java Xid.java
Added: src/main/javax/transaction/xa package.html
Log:
Some XA javadocs
Revision ChangesPath
1.6 +149 -17
- Original Message -
From: David Jencks [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, September 19, 2001 3:50 PM
Subject: Re: [JBoss-dev] VirtualHosts, security and deployers
Hi,
This is great!
I have some questions...
As I understand it a virtual host is an ip address
User: starksm
Date: 01/09/19 16:56:12
Modified:src/docs store.jsp
Log:
Update the MVCSoft product ID.
Revision ChangesPath
1.2 +1 -1 newsite/src/docs/store.jsp
Index: store.jsp
===
RCS
User: patriot1burke
Date: 01/09/19 16:57:43
Modified:src/main/org/jboss/ha HARMITarget.java HAPartitionImpl.java
DistributedReplicantManagerImpl.java
ClusterPartition.java
Log:
HAJNDI sort of works now. Framework definately works
User: patriot1burke
Date: 01/09/19 16:57:59
Modified:src/main/org/jboss/ha/jndi HANamingService.java HAJNDI.java
Log:
HAJNDI sort of works now. Framework definately works now.
Revision ChangesPath
1.3 +24 -19
hello... I can't seem to find much info on this...
This is valid in ejb-jar.xml for JBoss AND Weblogic
session-typeStateless/session-type
these are only valid for Weblogic... it appears to be just the new lines and
whitespace messing it up...
session-typeStateless/session-type
For me the perf test freezes after one or two of these messages, which I
always get. Doesn't matter which persistence manager I use.
I'm attaching the server and client (test) logs. Any ideas?
btw, in the jbossmq unit test, would you mind using the getInitialContext()
from JBossTestCase
Should *ALL* entity beans use the MethodOnlyEJBLock policy, or just the
read-only entity beans? I was under the impression that only the read-only
entity beans should use this policy, but your comment about standardjboss.xml
below leads me to believe otherwise.
++jeff
On Wednesday 19
On 2001.09.19 19:43:34 -0400 Scott M Stark wrote:
- Original Message -
From: David Jencks [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, September 19, 2001 3:50 PM
Subject: Re: [JBoss-dev] VirtualHosts, security and deployers
Hi,
This is great!
I have some
For me the perf test freezes after one or two of these
messages, which I
always get. Doesn't matter which persistence manager I use.
I'm attaching the server and client (test) logs. Any ideas?
Strange... I'll have a look.
btw, in the jbossmq unit test, would you mind using the
User: dmaplesden
Date: 01/09/19 18:06:30
Modified:src/main/org/jboss/test/jbossmq/perf
JBossMQPerfStressTestCase.java
Log:
change new InitialContext to getInitialContext
Revision ChangesPath
1.3 +1 -1
- Original Message -
From: David Jencks [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, September 19, 2001 5:55 PM
Subject: Re: [JBoss-dev] VirtualHosts, security and deployers
A security domain is really a passive property that is available to the
services
within the
Does this mean that if you leave all the interceptor then there
is no transactional locking on the bean?
This is an easy way to get ReadOnly before it gets implemented..
d.
-Original Message-
From: Bill Burke [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, September 19, 2001 10:53 AM
To:
User: dmaplesden
Date: 01/09/19 20:52:57
Modified:src/main/org/jboss/mq/server JMSTopic.java
ClientConsumer.java
Log:
fixed bug for message acknowledgement after receiver closed for topics
Revision ChangesPath
1.5 +9 -2
User: dmaplesden
Date: 01/09/19 20:55:11
Modified:src/main/org/jboss/mq/il/oil OILClientILService.java
Log:
Improved error message when client side error received
Revision ChangesPath
1.3 +2 -2 jbossmq/src/main/org/jboss/mq/il/oil/OILClientILService.java
OK, took longer than I thought. There was a fundamental bug that was
causing your freeze, but it was in code that only gets executed if something
else is going wrong... So fixing the bug was simple, fixing every else just
because it needed it took longer.
Anyway I won't bore you with the
User: dmaplesden
Date: 01/09/19 20:54:42
Modified:src/main/org/jboss/mq SpySession.java
SpyMessageConsumer.java Connection.java
Log:
fixed npe when a receive occurs after a subscription is closed. Also tidied up
closing down of sessions with receivers with
User: chirino
Date: 01/09/19 22:08:21
Modified:src/main/org/jboss/jms/asf ServerSessionPoolFactory.java
StdServerSession.java StdServerSessionPool.java
StdServerSessionPoolFactory.java
Log:
Transaction Timeout Fix: MDB that took a
User: chirino
Date: 01/09/19 22:13:14
Modified:src/main/org/jboss/mq SpySession.java
Log:
Allows the ASF stuff to access the XAResouceManager to control
transactions.
Revision ChangesPath
1.5 +9 -1 jbossmq/src/main/org/jboss/mq/SpySession.java
Index:
User: chirino
Date: 01/09/19 22:22:19
Modified:src/main/org/jboss/test/mdb/test MDBUnitTestCase.java
Log:
Added a test case for BMP MDBs. It is used to test that bean does not
get Transaction Timeout errors. To exercise the test, make sure you
set you Transaction Timeout
User: chirino
Date: 01/09/19 22:22:19
Added: src/main/org/jboss/test/mdb/bean BMPBean.java
Log:
Added a test case for BMP MDBs. It is used to test that bean does not
get Transaction Timeout errors. To exercise the test, make sure you
set you Transaction Timeout value to
User: chirino
Date: 01/09/19 22:22:19
Modified:src/resources/mdb/META-INF ejb-jar.xml jboss.xml
Log:
Added a test case for BMP MDBs. It is used to test that bean does not
get Transaction Timeout errors. To exercise the test, make sure you
set you Transaction Timeout value to
Hi Jason,
Anyways, I think there is still an issue with the tx recipts for an MDB. I
have to set the default tx timeout insainly high to avoid this problem.
I remember there were a few suggestions on how to fix this, but I am not
sure what happend to them...
I just commited chanages to
Excellent. This is something that really needs to be done and the
proposal is very good.
We're beginning to get our heads around smartcards and the security
domain fits very neatly into this, as we dynamically create keystores
for SSL and embedded encryption for http.
The only other thing that
JBoss daily test results
SUMMARY
Number of tests run: 21
Successful tests: 15
Errors:6
Failures: 0
[time of test: 20 September 2001 7:19 GMT]
[java.version:
Hello,
I just come back from the JBoss training in London: *it was a really great
training*!
During the first two days, Marc and Juha have gone through a deep
presentation of J2EE concepts, useful patterns, etc. Furthermore, even you
already are an experienced J2EE programer, you will enjoy
74 matches
Mail list logo
