JBoss daily test results
SUMMARY
Number of tests run: 231
Successful tests: 39
Errors:184
Failures: 8
[time of test: 12 January 2002 3:57 GMT]
[java.version: 1.
JBoss daily test results
SUMMARY
Number of tests run: 231
Successful tests: 39
Errors:184
Failures: 8
[time of test: 12 January 2002 3:30 GMT]
[java.version: 1.
JBoss daily test results
SUMMARY
Number of tests run: 231
Successful tests: 39
Errors:184
Failures: 8
[time of test: 12 January 2002 3:2 GMT]
[java.version: 1.3
JBoss daily test results
SUMMARY
Number of tests run: 231
Successful tests: 39
Errors:184
Failures: 8
[time of test: 12 January 2002 2:44 GMT]
[java.version: 1.
Feature Requests item #502573, was opened at 2002-01-11 17:10
You can respond by visiting:
http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=376688&aid=502573&group_id=22866
Category: JBossServer
Group: v2.4.x
Status: Open
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody)
Assigned to: Nobody/An
Hi,
Does anybody have any comments on this?
The idea is to allow applications to different
log4j configurations to JBoss.
Assuming my analysis is correct.
We should be able to do this as an interceptor,
just before the relevant ContainerInterceptor.
But this means the ContainerInterceptors can'
JDBC 3.0 is supposed to expose an api for the auto-generated fields in a
table. For JAWS integration, it will prob. be better to wait for this.
- jim
___
Jboss-development mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/j
final is good, it gives the hint to the JIT that
it won't change, so
log.info() can be "inlined"
private helps with this as well, no need for
polymorphism!
Regards,
Adrian
__
View this jboss-dev thread in the online forums:
http:
It really depends on the class it will be used in. For classes which
you expect to be subclasses and where the base class should use the
derived classes category, then a protected final Logger created on
construction would be used.
If you want the base class and the derived class to have separat
User: weave
Date: 02/01/11 12:18:57
Modified:src/main/org/jboss/mq/il/oil OILClientIL.java
OILClientILService.java OILServerIL.java
OILServerILService.java
Added: src/main/org/jboss/mq/il/oil OILConstants.java
Log:
Created a
Hi log4j-user,
I was pointed by Aron Kramlik to this mailing list.
I'm looking at implementing the RepositorySelector into JBoss.
I only found out about this class and 1.2 about 1 hour ago, so apologies
if my questions sound naive.
I've looked at the javadocs, I don't think this is in the manual
Hey,
On Mon, 31 Dec 2001, Sacha Labourey wrote:
> Servlet container implications
> ==
> As we exchange an HttpSession object between the servlet container and the
> EJB, it needs to be Serializable. Consequently, a new interface has been
> defined:
>
> public in
Here is the scoop.
Last I checked Oleg was working on this for EJB 2.0, but I have trouble
contacting him (our email servers don't like each other).
The way it will be implemented is with a lookup in JNDI that returns an
object that implements some yet to be defined AutoNumber interface. I thi
Oh, well then it looks like there might actually be something simple enough for me to
cut my teeth on after all. Wonderful! I'd be happy to give this a shot during one of
my Sunday coding sessions unless one of the more seasoned people on here would prefer
to do it instead of waiting on me.
Most application servers provide some sort of custom primary key generation
mechanism. Some rely on DB auto-increment features, some build it into the
persistence layer and some provide Java helper classes. Here's a link to
the Weblogic 6.1 page on the matter:
http://e-docs.bea.com/wls/docs61/
uhmm if I recall. again the source is not at hand. There were some changes
made in container that should work for entity and session. I recall the patch
really addressing a bug in session beans though although I think I tested
it against entity beans... its been so long ago. Ill look at the sour
Rhett Aultman wrote:
>It looked like something simple enough for even a >rookie like me to handle, but then
>I also recall >seeing a patch on Sourceforge that already addresses >this issue. I
>think it was patch 493604 or something >like that. If it's not being dealt with, I'm
>happy to >give i
It looked like something simple enough for even a rookie like me to handle, but then I
also recall seeing a patch on Sourceforge that already addresses this issue. I think
it was patch 493604 or something like that. If it's not being dealt with, I'm happy
to give it a shot. ;)
-Original
I can't find ejbHome either.
I didn't look that hard though :-)
Regards,
Adrian
__
View this jboss-dev thread in the online forums:
http://jboss.org/forums/thread.jsp?forum=66&thread=6979
ejbCreate and ejbPostCreate
Is anybody working on this? It's part of ejb-2.0.
It's reported in bugs on sourceforge and there's
quite a few questions in the forums.
Should be quite simple, but then I haven't
too gone too far into the rabbit hole yet :-)
Regards,
Adrian
__
extends org.jboss.system.ServiceMBeanSupport :-)
It's protected there.
Regards,
Adrian
__
View this jboss-dev thread in the online forums:
http://jboss.org/forums/thread.jsp?forum=66&thread=6964
User: lqd
Date: 02/01/11 04:31:05
Modified:src/main/org/jboss/mq Tag: Branch_2_4
GenericConnectionFactory.java
Log:
Backport of HEAD changes to Branch_2_4:
- use org.jboss.logging.Logger instead of log4j
- add debug level message when handing out
User: lqd
Date: 02/01/11 04:27:33
Modified:src/main/org/jboss/mq GenericConnectionFactory.java
Log:
- use org.jboss.logging.Logger instead of log4j
- add debug level message when handing out a ClientIL
- bump log level of "can't connect to server" from debug to error
R
hi,
is there a standard way of getting the Logger instance in JBoss? the
code is sprinkled with at least 4 different ways of doing so, i.e.
sometimes its a private variable, sometimes its protected, sometimes its
on a package level access, sometimes its declared as 'final', etc ...
how about agre
Bugs item #501972, was opened at 2002-01-10 11:04
You can respond by visiting:
http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=376685&aid=501972&group_id=22866
Category: JBossMQ
Group: v2.4 (stable)
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Corby (corby)
Assigned to: Nobody/Anonym
Hi
This feature is difficult to implement because there is no standard in the
DBs.
Some do like Oracle, PostgreSQL, some do it differentely like M$ SQL-Server
and Sybase with the "Identity" table attribute and some do not provide
anything
like M$ Access.
It becomes more difficult if you need aut
I can't check which J2EE servers support this feature but as Richard
Monson-Haefel said in his "Enterprise Javabeans" (O'Reilly), this feature is
supported by MOST application servers. Maybe I haven't enough experience but
I suppose how much effort would be made and extra problems would be cause
Is this a feature supported by other J2EE servers? If so, we should have it also.
If not, should we be first? I'm now in a situation that i actually myself would like to
have that feature, but can't cover all the pros and cons with it. Any comments from
others already been this way, i mean there h
Bugs item #501972, was opened at 2002-01-10 11:04
You can respond by visiting:
http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=376685&aid=501972&group_id=22866
Category: JBossMQ
Group: v2.4 (stable)
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Corby (corby)
Assigned to: Nobody/Anonym
29 matches
Mail list logo
