User: user57
Date: 02/04/15 01:04:33
Removed: jboss/etc/root Tag: Branch_3_0 .stupidcvs
Log:
___
Jboss-development mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development
User: user57
Date: 02/04/15 01:02:14
Added: jboss/etc/root .donotremove
Removed: jboss/etc/root .stupidcvs
Log:
o cvs is really dumb sometimes
Revision ChangesPath
1.1 build/jboss/etc/root/.donotremove
Binary file
Could be as simple as moving iiop from optional group to standard. Might also
need to set some properties... though I would hope we could do this from
*service.xml and not have to modify scripts for iiop functionality.
--jason
Quoting Scott M Stark [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
It will be in the
User: user57
Date: 02/04/15 01:00:30
Added: jboss/etc/root .stupidcvs
Log:
o testing
Revision ChangesPath
1.1 build/jboss/etc/root/.stupidcvs
Binary file
___
Jboss-development mailing
Number of tests run: 556
Successful tests: 515
Errors:28
Failures: 13
[time of test: 15 April 2002 1:1 GMT]
[java.version: 1.3.0]
[java.vendor: IBM Corporation]
Are you building with -Dgroups=most?
Otherwise iiop will not be included in the build... or do you mean
instructions on how to build configure?
--jason
Quoting Scott M Stark [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Then we can just post directions on how to setup and try iiop
with the RC1 binary I'm
It will have to be a seperate service release with instructions on how
to incorporate because iiop is broken right now:
== Executing 'most' in module 'iiop'...
==
_buildmagic:init:
configure:
init:
compile-classes:
[mkdir] Created dir:
Ahh yes, this looks like the aftermath of David's changes iiop being
optional. This sucks. I have run into this ebfore, where I forgot to change
some optional module.
I think that perhaps we should do away with optional modules in this sense...
probably still need optional for catalina
Just make the compilation of those that need external configuration
conditional on the existence of the config using a property. That
is what I for the 2.4 branch and I only compile the servlet engines
when their respective container dists are available.
- Original Message -
From: Jason
The 3.0 branching is complete and main is available for checkins.
Scott Stark
Chief Technology Officer
JBoss Group, LLC
___
Jboss-development mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
The initial release candiate of the 3.0.0 series is available from
sourceforge
in the files section:
http://sourceforge.net/project/showfiles.php?group_id=22866
Scott Stark
Chief Technology Officer
JBoss Group, LLC
User: starksm
Date: 02/04/15 02:36:40
Modified:jbossTag: Branch_3_0 build.xml
Log:
Update the version info
Revision ChangesPath
No revision
No revision
1.117.2.1 +3 -3 build/jboss/build.xml
Index:
Hello,
I am using JBoss 3.0.0beta2(200204150942) on Win2k SP2.
The function tableExists in this class makes the following jdbc call:
rs = dmd.getTables(con.getCatalog(), null, tableName, null);
I am using DB2 as dbms, and this piece of code will not work if tableName contains a
prefix. Indeed,
Bugs item #543963, was opened at 2002-04-15 01:43
You can respond by visiting:
http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=543963group_id=22866
Category: JBossServer
Group: v3.0 Rabbit Hole
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Stephen Coy (scoy)
Assigned to: Jay
Sorry, I assumed that ./build.sh clean main would build everything,
especially since the iiop tests appear to be running (and failing)
Could we perhaps have the default target compile everything, and have a
core target that compiles the things that are expected to work? This
happened once
I am using the CVS as of 8:30 EST April 15..
I have an ear file that looks like
45 Fri Apr 12 18:00:52 EDT 2002 META-INF/MANIFEST.MF
1030 Fri Mar 01 11:42:00 EST 2002 cadexTest.war
42033 Fri Apr 12 18:00:52 EDT 2002 cadex-test.jar
71832 Tue Feb 26 17:58:12 EST 2002 cactus.jar
117522 Thu
JL@esial wrote:
Hello,
I am using JBoss 3.0.0beta2(200204150942) on Win2k SP2.
The function tableExists in this class makes the following jdbc call:
rs = dmd.getTables(con.getCatalog(), null, tableName, null);
I am using DB2 as dbms, and this piece of code will not work if
tableName
Yes, this was a consequence of moving UnifiedClassLoader from
org.jboss.system to org.jboss.mx.loading. Too bad I went offline
last night...
Let's make iiop part of the default build, so this kind of problem
will not happen again.
Francisco
On Mon, 15 Apr 2002, Jason Dillon wrote:
Ahh yes,
Jboss works fine with my tables in DB2, as long as I prefix all my table-name with
the name of my DB2 tablespace. I have to do that because otherwise SQL queries will
not work. It is ok to have a table-name entry wich is a concatenation of a schema
name and a table name, because it works
On Mon, 15 Apr 2002, David Jencks wrote:
Sorry, I assumed that ./build.sh clean main would build everything,
especially since the iiop tests appear to be running (and failing)
I was not aware the iiop tests were running by default. They shouldn't,
because right now they require three special
Bugs item #544224, was opened at 2002-04-15 15:29
You can respond by visiting:
http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=544224group_id=22866
Category: JBossServer
Group: v2.4 (stable)
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Andrew Smallbone (andrewsmallbone)
Bugs item #543408, was opened at 2002-04-13 17:10
You can respond by visiting:
http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=543408group_id=22866
Category: JBossCMP
Group: v3.0 Rabbit Hole
Status: Open
Resolution: Invalid
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Patrick Charbonnier (pch)
Assigned
This looks like a hack to me. Should we consider adding a schema-name
element to the table configuration? By this I mean that where ever we
have table-name in the jbosscmp-jdbc.xml file we can have an optional
schema-name element. Also in the getTables call in we would pass the
schema name
I don't see how that is different than using MYSPACE.MYTABLE. Same
amount of code for the user, but you would have to support Yet Another
Feature. IMHO it's the same to write:
SCHEMAmyschema/SCHEMA
TABLEmytable/TABLE
than
TABLEmyschema.mytable/TABLE
Do other environments support this? This
I think so. It should be a default also. There was also someone who
wanted to map the user name to the schema name. This needs a little more
thought, since there could be problems with uniqueness of pk's if you
aren't careful. I'm also not sure how this would work with create-tables
-- if you
Yes, it is the same work if you are going to specify both. The real
benefit comes from being able to specify schema-name in the defaults
section.
-dain
Ignacio Coloma wrote:
I don't see how that is different than using MYSPACE.MYTABLE. Same
amount of code for the user, but you would have
Hi Claudio,
On Mon, 15 Apr 2002, Vesco Claudio wrote:
Francisco, can you patch org.jboss.iiop.WebCL?
Just did it. Cheers,
Francisco
___
Jboss-development mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
I just checked out the Branch_3_0. I can't build catalina.
[javac]
/home/dennis/usr/jboss-all/catalina/src/main/org/jboss/test/tomcat/ejb/bean=
/StatelessSessionBean.java:12: cannot resolve symbol
[javac] symbol : class ServiceLibraries
[javac] location: package system
[javac]
From theserverside.com:
ObjectWeb has released a test suite for JMS features under LGPL. This
suite tests JMS features; its code base is pure JMS without dependency
from any vendor and provides a simple framework to be used by any JMS
providers.
http://www.objectweb.org/joram/tests
I
User: reverbel
Date: 02/04/15 09:35:31
Modified:iiop/src/main/org/jboss/iiop WebCL.java
Log:
Changed to use UnifiedClassLoader from org.jboss.mx.loading.
Revision ChangesPath
1.4 +2 -2 contrib/iiop/src/main/org/jboss/iiop/WebCL.java
Index: WebCL.java
Hi alls!
For the testsuite. In my local cvs repository I have removed the iiop tests
from stress test case and added in a new target which sets the properties to
make running the iiop part. These test are called from tests target. (I have
written this some mails ago :-) )
When I have time I
Is this the start of the war between open-source and Sun I wonder that the
JavaWorld article is talking about?
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Dain
Sundstrom
Sent: Monday, April 15, 2002 12:49 PM
To: JBoss-dev
Subject: [JBoss-dev]
I'm having trouble with the cvs repository. It is reporting a cvs
lock in /cvsroot/jboss/manual/src/metadata. Is there anything I can do to
fix this?
-Larry
User: cazzius
Date: 02/04/15 09:03:49
Modified:src/etc/example-config mysql-service.xml
Log:
Changed DefaultDS to MySqlDS. Thanks to Ricardo Argüello
Revision ChangesPath
1.2 +1 -1 jbosscx/src/etc/example-config/mysql-service.xml
Index:
User: starksm
Date: 02/04/15 10:43:28
Modified:catalina/src/main/org/jboss/test/tomcat/ejb/bean
StatelessSessionBean.java
Log:
Get to build after org.jboss.system class relocation
Revision ChangesPath
1.2 +18 -10
User: starksm
Date: 02/04/15 10:42:01
Modified:catalina/src/main/org/jboss/test/tomcat/servlet Tag:
Branch_3_0 PrintClassLoaders.java
Log:
Get to build after org.jboss.system class relocation
Revision ChangesPath
No revision
Hello,
In the connector/src/etc/example-config/mysql-service.xml example file:
config-property-valuejdbc:mysql://dell:/jbossdb/config-property-value
Needs to be changed to:
config-property-valuejdbc:mysql://dell:3306/jbossdb/config-property-value
Because of this exception:
Caused by:
User: starksm
Date: 02/04/15 10:42:00
Modified:catalina/src/main/org/jboss/test/tomcat/ejb/bean Tag:
Branch_3_0 StatelessSessionBean.java
Log:
Get to build after org.jboss.system class relocation
Revision ChangesPath
No
I'll change it, but I'm curious as to what your configuration is since this
is exactly the configuration that worked on my machines;-)
david jencks
On 2002.04.15 13:57:32 -0400 Ricardo Argüello wrote:
Hello,
In the connector/src/etc/example-config/mysql-service.xml example file:
Bugs item #543408, was opened at 2002-04-13 17:10
You can respond by visiting:
http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=543408group_id=22866
Category: JBossCMP
Group: v3.0 Rabbit Hole
Status: Open
Resolution: Invalid
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Patrick Charbonnier (pch)
Assigned
User: d_jencks
Date: 02/04/15 11:26:19
Modified:src/etc/example-config mysql-service.xml
Log:
added port to url string
Revision ChangesPath
1.3 +1 -1 jbosscx/src/etc/example-config/mysql-service.xml
Index: mysql-service.xml
Just MySql 3.23.46-nt + 2.0.11 mm.mysql drivers.. :-)
The old mysql-service.xml file worked fine with jdbc:mysql://localhost:/mydb...
The new one doesn't... go figure.
---
The MM.MySQL project has released a new 2.0.12 version:
Bugs item #543408, was opened at 2002-04-13 10:10
You can respond by visiting:
http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=543408group_id=22866
Category: JBossCMP
Group: v3.0 Rabbit Hole
Status: Closed
Resolution: Invalid
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Patrick Charbonnier (pch)
Bugs item #541866, was opened at 2002-04-10 00:58
You can respond by visiting:
http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=541866group_id=22866
Category: None
Group: v3.0 Rabbit Hole
Status: Closed
Resolution: Fixed
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Peter Luttrell (objec)
Assigned to:
Bugs item #533237, was opened at 2002-03-21 12:42
You can respond by visiting:
http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=533237group_id=22866
Category: JBossCMP
Group: v3.0 Rabbit Hole
Status: Closed
Resolution: Works For Me
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Neale Swinnerton (neales)
Bugs item #472072, was opened at 2001-10-17 09:06
You can respond by visiting:
http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=472072group_id=22866
Category: JBossServer
Group: v3.0 Rabbit Hole
Status: Closed
Resolution: Fixed
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody)
Bugs item #543408, was opened at 2002-04-13 10:10
You can respond by visiting:
http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=543408group_id=22866
Category: JBossCMP
Group: v3.0 Rabbit Hole
Status: Closed
Resolution: Invalid
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Patrick Charbonnier (pch)
This is number 2, after iiop. After a similar problem in the fall when
build/build.sh clean main turned out not to build anywhere near all of the
system I thought this had been fixed.
I'll take a look.
thanks
david jencks
On 2002.04.15 11:38:00 -0400 Dennis Muhlestein wrote:
I just checked
Guys,
deadline for early payment was today and the training is selling well. Come
to this 3 day training May 6-8. It is a brand new JBoss training that
covers 2.4 advanced stuff and 3.0 architecture and code.
The contents go from UnifiedClassLoader architecture to the detached invoker
and
Bugs item #544342, was opened at 2002-04-15 13:48
You can respond by visiting:
http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=544342group_id=22866
Category: JBossCMP
Group: v3.0 Rabbit Hole
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: frederik sauer (fredsa)
Assigned to:
Sorry, I assumed that ./build.sh clean main would build everything,
especially since the iiop tests appear to be running (and failing)
Yes, yes... not your fault.
Could we perhaps have the default target compile everything, and have a
core target that compiles the things that are expected
According to SourceForge, there were no downloads of the JBoss3.0RC1 when I started my
download.
Sounds like I am the first person to grab a copy?
-Steve
--
Trying to recover from a motherboard meltdown...
* * *
View thread online: http://main.jboss.org/thread.jsp?forum=66thread=12958
Sorry to deflate your pride, but I believe those stats are updated at most
daily, and often less often.
david jencks
On 2002.04.15 16:43:02 -0400 Stephen Davidson wrote:
According to SourceForge, there were no downloads of the JBoss3.0RC1 when
I started my download.
Sounds like I am the
Prolly not. The sourceforge statistics are updated periodically by a
cron job, and are often Just Plain Wrong.
sorry.
-danch
Stephen Davidson wrote:
According to SourceForge, there were no downloads of the JBoss3.0RC1 when I started
my download.
Sounds like I am the first person to grab
I don't know what directory is used to set DocumentRoot of httpd.conf file
apache, when you're integrating apache, tomcat and jboss.
I have done two options, first, I set documentRoot as $JBOSS_DIST/deploy and
later documentRoot as $CATALINA_HOME/webapps, both work, but I'm not so
sure, I
Are we going to release Jetty and Tomcat integrated packages, or does
the package already contain an integrated stack?
Did we branch or just tag? I don't really understand CVS branches (I
have a book on it, just haven't read it yet). Do I need to check fixes
into the branch and head?
I have submitted a request to SF.NET to drop this lock... this is really
starting to piss me off.
--jason
lsanders wrote:
I'm having trouble with the cvs repository. It is reporting a cvs
lock in /cvsroot/jboss/manual/src/metadata. Is there anything I can
do to fix this?
-Larry
I'm working the the catalina bundle, jetty is integrated by default.
There is a branch called Branch_3_0 and the release is tagged
with JBoss_3_0_0_RC1. You have to make changes on both the
Branch_3_0 branch and main.
Scott Stark
Chief Technology Officer
JBoss Group,
|-Original Message-
|From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
|[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Dain
|Sundstrom
|Sent: Monday, April 15, 2002 2:46 PM
|To: JBoss-dev
|Subject: [JBoss-dev] RC1 release question
|
|
|Are we going to release Jetty and Tomcat integrated packages, or does
|the package
Jason,
I like the fact that BuildMagic brings order to a somewhat chaotic
build/commit process.
At least your builds were capable of detecting the problem as the individual
developers did not keep in sync. That quite alright!
Order! Order I say! We need order in the open source network, you
|Sounds like I am the first person to grab a copy?
You want a Tshirt?
marcf
|
|-Steve
|--
|Trying to recover from a motherboard meltdown...
|
|
|* * *
|
|View thread online: http://main.jboss.org/thread.jsp?forum=66thread=12958
|
|___
alright, stop the abuse,
Steve you *may well be* the first guy who grabbed a copy, you are certainly
the first one to report it :)
YOU WIN a tshirt, send us ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) your address and we will send it
when we can.
For everyone else, All your J2EE(tm) are belong to us and May the
User: user57
Date: 02/04/15 15:35:14
Modified:.modules
Log:
o no more website alias
Revision ChangesPath
1.112 +2 -2 CVSROOT/modules
Index: modules
===
RCS file:
User: user57
Date: 02/04/15 15:50:23
Modified:jbossbuild.xml
Log:
o optional members now part of standard
o optional-requires-config - optional
* will deal with detecting config for optional later
Revision ChangesPath
1.118 +6 -9
User: user57
Date: 02/04/15 15:55:12
Modified:.build.xml
Log:
o fixed snapshots lists
Revision ChangesPath
1.6 +2 -2 website-snapshots/build.xml
Index: build.xml
===
RCS file:
on 16-04-2 00.56, Peter Fagerlund at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
on 16-04-2 00.20, marc fleury at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
|Sounds like I am the first person to grab a copy?
You want a Tshirt?
how many jboss contributers does it take to change a lightbulb ?
one to hold the bulb
one to
on 16-04-2 00.20, marc fleury at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
|Sounds like I am the first person to grab a copy?
You want a Tshirt?
how many jboss contributers does it take to change a lightbulb ?
___
Jboss-development mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Number of tests run: 563
Successful tests: 514
Errors:31
Failures: 18
[time of test: 16 April 2002 0:44 GMT]
[java.version: 1.3.0]
[java.vendor: IBM Corporation]
|4 in all + the backup of thousands more - cool ...
|
|;-)
|
|Love
Love indeed my friend, your english is greatly improved
Bouge de la
marcf
|/peter_f
___
Jboss-development mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bugs item #544437, was opened at 2002-04-15 18:00
You can respond by visiting:
http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=544437group_id=22866
Category: JBossCMP
Group: v3.0 Rabbit Hole
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: frederik sauer (fredsa)
Assigned to:
I will get to this when I have time to work on the build system again.
--jason
Scott M Stark wrote:
Just make the compilation of those that need external configuration
conditional on the existence of the config using a property. That
is what I for the 2.4 branch and I only compile the servlet
I setup the build system to include jboss.net iiop in the default
builds. Please look at the configuration that is generated and make
sure that iiop stuff will work with a default build.
Note, this is on HEAD.
--jason
Francisco Reverbel wrote:
Will it include the iiop stuff? Jason and I
I think that adding a schema name element as described below would be a
great idea. At the present moment, I am hacking
JDBCStartCommand.tableExists:
DatabaseMetaData dmd = con.getMetaData();
rs = dmd.getTables(con.getCatalog(), dmd.getUserName(),
tableName, null);
But I
The ./jboss-all/testsuite/build.sh generates a cannot resolve symbol error:
./jboss-all/testsuite/src/main/org/jboss/test/security/service/SecurityConfig,
Line: 91
config.setConfig(loginConfig);
Looks like it should be:
config.setConfigURL(loginConfig);
After that it
Number of tests run: 563
Successful tests: 519
Errors:30
Failures: 14
[time of test: 16 April 2002 1:37 GMT]
[java.version: 1.3.0]
[java.vendor: IBM Corporation]
Number of tests run: 561
Successful tests: 524
Errors:31
Failures: 6
[time of test: 16 April 2002 2:48 GMT]
[java.version: 1.3.1]
[java.vendor: Blackdown Java-Linux
1. I agree with you.
2. I've been wondering about something
As I recall in Oracle if youre user name = schema name you don't need to
prefix table names with the schema name?
The tables in different schemas are completely independent, right?
Someone wanted to have users login name translate to
User: d_jencks
Date: 02/04/15 19:20:46
Added: src/etc/example-config solid-service.xml
Log:
solid db config example contributed by Casey Haakenson
Revision ChangesPath
1.1 jbosscx/src/etc/example-config/solid-service.xml
Index: solid-service.xml
User: d_jencks
Date: 02/04/15 20:21:35
Added: src/etc/example-config jdatastore-service.xml
Log:
JDataStore local config contributed by Brent Thompson
Revision ChangesPath
1.1 jbosscx/src/etc/example-config/jdatastore-service.xml
Index:
Number of tests run: 563
Successful tests: 527
Errors:31
Failures: 5
[time of test: 16 April 2002 4:12 GMT]
[java.version: 1.3.1]
[java.vendor: Blackdown Java-Linux
See annotations below:
On Tuesday, April 16, 2002, at 12:10 PM, David Jencks wrote:
1. I agree with you.
2. I've been wondering about something
As I recall in Oracle if youre user name = schema name you don't need to
prefix table names with the schema name?
Yes.
The tables in
Can you open a feature request for this, and assign it to me (dsundstrom)?
Thanks
-dain
Stephen Coy wrote:
See annotations below:
On Tuesday, April 16, 2002, at 12:10 PM, David Jencks wrote:
1. I agree with you.
2. I've been wondering about something
As I recall in Oracle if youre
Anyone else getting this from the iiop module?
I have linux 2.4.16, jdk 1.3.1_03 from sun.
Any advice?
compile-rmi:
Verify has been turned on.
RMI Compiling 1 class to /usr/java/jboss/co12/jboss-all/iiop/output/classes
IIOP has been turned on.
java.lang.UnsatisfiedLinkError:
User: starksm
Date: 02/04/15 21:44:05
Modified:catalina/src/main/org/jboss/web/catalina Tag: Branch_3_0
EmbeddedCatalinaServiceSX.java
Log:
Handle the njar protocol war urls now being seen at this level.
Revision ChangesPath
No
User: starksm
Date: 02/04/15 21:57:07
Modified:catalina/src/resources Tag: Branch_3_0 jboss-service.xml
Log:
Set the catalina.home entity to the location used by the JBoss/Catalina
bundle
Revision ChangesPath
No revision
No
Number of tests run: 556
Successful tests: 519
Errors:31
Failures: 6
[time of test: 16 April 2002 6:6 GMT]
[java.version: 1.3.1]
[java.vendor: Sun Microsystems Inc.]
Bugs item #537152, was opened at 2002-03-30 10:10
You can respond by visiting:
http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=537152group_id=22866
Category: CatalinaBundle
Group: v3.0 Rabbit Hole
Status: Closed
Resolution: Duplicate
Priority: 8
Submitted By: Pravin Pillai
The JBoss-3.0.0RC1/Tomcat-4.0.3 bundle is now available from
the SourceForge files page:
http://sourceforge.net/project/showfiles.php?group_id=22866
Scott Stark
Chief Technology Officer
JBoss Group, LLC
Have you given anythought to making the Tomcat 4.x component available as a
seperate release which requires the basic JBoss release? So if a user wanted
JBoss Tomcat they would need the JBoss-xxx and Tomcat-Plugin-xxx archives?
I think that as we add more components (non-standard to the
89 matches
Mail list logo
