[JBoss-dev] [ jboss-Patches-559028 ] Replace log4j.jar with version 1.2.1

2002-05-22 Thread noreply
Patches item #559028, was opened at 2002-05-22 09:32 You can respond by visiting: http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376687aid=559028group_id=22866 Category: None Group: None Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Ari Schot (aschot) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous

[JBoss-dev] [ jboss-Bugs-557394 ] Log4j Mail Appender not working

2002-05-22 Thread noreply
Bugs item #557394, was opened at 2002-05-17 11:51 You can respond by visiting: http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=557394group_id=22866 Category: JBossServer Group: v3.0 Rabbit Hole Status: Open Resolution: Accepted Priority: 5 Submitted By: Ignacio Coloma (alu1344)

[JBoss-dev] [ jboss-Patches-559034 ] Patch to allow more readable metadata

2002-05-22 Thread noreply
Patches item #559034, was opened at 2002-05-22 09:52 You can respond by visiting: http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376687aid=559034group_id=22866 Category: JBossServer Group: None Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Ari Schot (aschot) Assigned to:

Re: [JBoss-dev] log4j.jar appender loading

2002-05-22 Thread Scott M Stark
Even if DOMConfigurator is fixed to use the TCL, there needs to be a seperation between the bootstrap configuration and the final server configuration because when the log4j.xml descriptor is read by the Log4jService the only classes available are the bootstrap classes: log4j: Attaching appender

Re: [JBoss-dev] log4j.jar appender loading

2002-05-22 Thread Jason Dillon
A custom DOMConfigurator would be easier, but will only fix this specific problem... and I am sure that this will popup again for some other reason. If we can make a tiny and intelligent wrapper to use instead of URLClassLoader for ServerLoader, which will use the default URLClassLoader

Re: [JBoss-dev] [AUTOMATED] JBoss org.jboss.Shutdown does not work

2002-05-22 Thread Chris Kimpton
Hi, This should be fixed now - it seems jnet.jar is now required as well as the shutdown.jar. Regards, Chris = -- http://www.soccer2002.org.uk - The Game is On! __ Do You Yahoo!? LAUNCH - Your Yahoo!

[JBoss-dev] Deployment Error Using 2.4.6 with Timcat 4.0.3

2002-05-22 Thread Artie Copeland
i am having a real problem using JBoss in a production environment. any time i try to deploy more than 5 components (ear, war, jar) i receive this error. it doesn't matter if i try to hot deploy or deploy on startup. my configuration is RedHat Linux 7.1, ibm jdk 1.3.1, mySql with XA, Apache

Re: [JBoss-dev] Deployment Error Using 2.4.6 with Timcat 4.0.3

2002-05-22 Thread Scott M Stark
Validate that the jboss.jar is not corrupted. It should match: [starksm@main ext]$ cksum jboss.jar 1444238133 892110 jboss.jar [starksm@main ext]$ md5sum jboss.jar 9e12a4c974657b490ff05dbb95461dd7 jboss.jar Scott Stark Chief Technology Officer JBoss Group, LLC

[JBoss-dev] [ jboss-Bugs-559012 ] Why no deploy error for service CNFE

2002-05-22 Thread noreply
Bugs item #559012, was opened at 2002-05-21 22:30 You can respond by visiting: http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=559012group_id=22866 Category: JBossServer Group: v3.0 Rabbit Hole Status: Closed Resolution: Invalid Priority: 5 Submitted By: Scott M Stark (starksm)

[JBoss-dev] Going to log4j 1.2.2 for 3.x

2002-05-22 Thread Scott M Stark
I'm upgrading the 3.x releases to use log4j 1.2.2 as this includes a change to use the TCL during configuration related class loading. I'm also going to split the Log4jService behavior into a boot and final config behavior as currently non-trivial appenders like SMTP, JDBC, etc. that depend on

Re: [JBoss-dev] The method return values in the home interface must be of valid t ypes for RMI/IIOP

2002-05-22 Thread jaywalters
Post a bug to sourceforge. Cheers From: Mahesh Agarwal [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: 2002/05/22 Wed PM 04:09:57 EDT To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] CC: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [JBoss-dev] The method return values in the home interface must be of valid t ypes for RMI/IIOP Hi All I am getting

[JBoss-dev] Deflating (or creating) a JAR file from a Directory

2002-05-22 Thread Andreas Schaefer
Hi Geeks Before I am wasting a lot of time: Does anyone know or know an article how to create the same behaviour programmatically what the JAR tool does ? Thanx x Andreas Schaefer Senior Consultant JBoss Group, LLC x

Re: [JBoss-dev] Going to log4j 1.2.2 for 3.x

2002-05-22 Thread Jason Dillon
Ok, I understand more now... though you know that log4j.properties is going to be used even before ServerImpl gets created right... It looks like the UCL bits should be operable at the time when Log4jService is created... the TCL is set right before it is started. But I would guess (since I

Re: [JBoss-dev] Deflating (or creating) a JAR file from a Directory

2002-05-22 Thread Scott M Stark
There is a simple Jar utility in our codebase under common: org.jboss.util.file.JarUtils It depends on how much of the jar tool functionality you need. Scott Stark Chief Technology Officer JBoss Group, LLC - Original Message - From:

Re: [JBoss-dev] Deflating (or creating) a JAR file from a Directory

2002-05-22 Thread Dan Christopherson
ant. Use the Source! -danch Andreas Schaefer wrote: Hi Geeks Before I am wasting a lot of time: Does anyone know or know an article how to create the same behaviour programmatically what the JAR tool does ? Thanx x Andreas Schaefer Senior Consultant JBoss Group,

Re: [JBoss-dev] Going to log4j 1.2.2 for 3.x

2002-05-22 Thread Jason Dillon
Do we have to do anything short of move the Log4jService into jboss-service.xml to make this happen? The first time Category/Logger is loaded, it will automatically configure with log4j.properties found in run.jar, thus giving us logging with no real effort short of providing a

Re: [JBoss-dev] Going to log4j 1.2.2 for 3.x

2002-05-22 Thread Scott M Stark
Yes, just moving Log4jService is enough. Scott Stark Chief Technology Officer JBoss Group, LLC - Original Message - From: Jason Dillon [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Scott M Stark [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, May 21, 2002

RE: [JBoss-dev] Deflating (or creating) a JAR file from aDirecto ry

2002-05-22 Thread Tieying Liu
http://developer.java.sun.com/developer/technicalArticles/Programming/compre ssion/ -Original Message- From: Andreas Schaefer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, May 22, 2002 2:42 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [JBoss-dev] Deflating (or creating) a JAR file from a Directory

[JBoss-dev] Automated JBoss(HEAD) Testsuite Results: 23-May-2002

2002-05-22 Thread chris
Number of tests run: 737 Successful tests: 576 Errors:155 Failures: 6 [time of test: 23 May 2002 0:44 GMT] [java.version: 1.3.0] [java.vendor: IBM Corporation]

[JBoss-dev] Problem with LMCF changes to use DriverManager

2002-05-22 Thread Jason Dillon
I updated my Branch_3_0 workspace today, rebuilt and found that code that worked yesterday stopped functioning today. Looks like the change to LMCF to use DriverManager is now having trouble finding my jdbc driver (oracle.jbdc.driver.OracleDriver). Below is the trace with the SQLException

Re: [JBoss-dev] Automated JBoss(HEAD) Testsuite Results: 23-May-2002

2002-05-22 Thread Scott M Stark
There are numerous errors like the following in the server log: 2002-05-23 00:22:32,880 ERROR [org.jboss.ejb.EntityContainer] Initialization failed org.jboss.deployment.DeploymentException: Error while fixing table name; - nested throwable: (org.jboss.util.NestedSQLException: Could not create

Re: [JBoss-dev] Automated JBoss(HEAD) Testsuite Results: 23-May-2002

2002-05-22 Thread Jason Dillon
I have a fix for this coming soon. --jason On Wednesday 22 May 2002 05:11 pm, Scott M Stark wrote: There are numerous errors like the following in the server log: 2002-05-23 00:22:32,880 ERROR [org.jboss.ejb.EntityContainer] Initialization failed org.jboss.deployment.DeploymentException:

[JBoss-dev] [ jboss-Bugs-559441 ] Local DB Connections broken

2002-05-22 Thread noreply
Bugs item #559441, was opened at 2002-05-23 11:21 You can respond by visiting: http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=559441group_id=22866 Category: JBossCX Group: v3.0 Rabbit Hole Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Stephen Coy (scoy) Assigned to:

[JBoss-dev] [ jboss-Patches-559448 ] XAConnectionImpl - constructor change

2002-05-22 Thread noreply
Patches item #559448, was opened at 2002-05-23 02:03 You can respond by visiting: http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376687aid=559448group_id=22866 Category: JBossCX Group: v2.4 (stable) Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Jim Cook (oravecz) Assigned to:

Re: [JBoss-dev] Going to log4j 1.2.2 for 3.x

2002-05-22 Thread Scott M Stark
The problem isn't the URLCL vs UCL loader issue at this point. The problem is that there is nothing in the UCL repository as you say. Therefore it makes no sense to intialize the Log4jService as this point. Just moving the Log4jService setup to the core conf/jboss-service.xml descriptor and out

Re: [JBoss-dev] Going to log4j 1.2.2 for 3.x

2002-05-22 Thread Jason Dillon
the problem. The only issue I see is that the initial startup info including the loading of the lib jars is not showing up in the server.log. I think this is minor and could change if we fix up how the core service framework operates. No matter what we do there will always be some space

[JBoss-dev] The method return values in the home interface must be of valid types for RMI/IIOP

2002-05-22 Thread Mahesh Agarwal
Hi All I am getting a warning while deploying the ejbs in JBOss. Can anyone please help? Bean : OrgMgr Method : public abstract OrgMgr create() throws CreateException, EJBException, RemoteException Section: 6.10.6 Warning: The method return values in the home interface must be of valid types

[JBoss-dev] CD SUBSCRIPTION

2002-05-22 Thread marc fleury
Folks, By public demand we will now distribute a subscription CD. This CD is meant for people who don't want to wait for large downloads to complete from SourceForge and want the latest and greatest of JBoss delivered to their door every 3 months directly from JBossGroup. Don't wait to take

RE: [JBoss-dev] CD SUBSCRIPTION

2002-05-22 Thread marc fleury
right... it costs $1000 per year, and we start this program with an ooops marcf |-Original Message- |From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] |[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of James |Ward |Sent: Wednesday, May 22, 2002 1:25 PM |To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Jboss-User@Lists. |Sourceforge. Net |Subject: