Hi!
I think, I have corrected this problem in HEAD. But until now I haven't
feedback.
I don't think that we need a mbean to manage relationship, but I think that
Dain can give us a better response :-)
Claudio
-Original Message-
From: David Jencks [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Number of tests run: 606
Successful tests: 601
Errors:4
Failures: 1
[time of test: 7 June 2002 0:29 GMT]
[java.version: 1.3.1]
[java.vendor: Apple Computer, Inc.]
Bugs item #565701, was opened at 2002-06-07 08:15
You can respond by visiting:
http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=565701group_id=22866
Category: JBossServer
Group: v3.0 Rabbit Hole
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Nigel Magnay (magnayn)
Assigned to:
Bugs item #565721, was opened at 2002-06-07 09:32
You can respond by visiting:
http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=565721group_id=22866
Category: JBossServer
Group: v2.4 (stable)
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: raitmayer ronny (raitmayerr)
Assigned
Use JDK = 1.3
-Message d'origine-
De : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]De la part de
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Envoyé : vendredi, 7 juin 2002 11:33
À : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Objet : [JBoss-dev] [ jboss-Bugs-565721 ] Sever Startup failes
Bugs item #565721, was opened at
Feature Requests item #565766, was opened at 2002-06-07 04:19
You can respond by visiting:
http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376688aid=565766group_id=22866
Category: JBossServer
Group: None
Status: Open
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody)
Assigned to:
On 2002.06.07 03:03:41 -0400 Vesco Claudio wrote:
Hi!
I think, I have corrected this problem in HEAD.
Yes. I ported it back to 3.0. As far as I can tell it mostly reverts
scott's changes?
But until now I haven't
feedback.
I don't think that we need a mbean to manage relationship, but
Bugs item #565472, was opened at 2002-06-06 20:48
You can respond by visiting:
http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=565472group_id=22866
Category: JBossMQ
Group: v3.0 Rabbit Hole
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 7
Submitted By: Marius Kotsbak (mkotsbak)
Assigned to:
between the lines...
-Original Message-
From: David Jencks [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, June 07, 2002 1:34 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [JBoss-dev] cmp2 relations, mbeans, and the testsuite
On 2002.06.07 03:03:41 -0400 Vesco Claudio wrote:
Hi!
I
Your change corrects the problem introduced by moving the entity bridge
out of create, but this introduces the problem seen in the bug as now the
DataSource is being accessed in create when the dependency may not
have been satisfied. Dain said he would look at this.
- Original Message -
Bugs item #565804, was opened at 2002-06-07 09:09
You can respond by visiting:
http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=565804group_id=22866
Category: None
Group: v3.0 Rabbit Hole
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Andrew Thorn (sigbur)
Assigned to:
Bugs item #565472, was opened at 2002-06-06 20:48
You can respond by visiting:
http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=565472group_id=22866
Category: JBossMQ
Group: v3.0 Rabbit Hole
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Marius Kotsbak (mkotsbak)
Assigned to:
I didn't know so many people were using HEAD.
The MBean idea for a relationship is a good idea, and I thought a lot
about using one when writing the cmp code. The big problems are
transactions, locking and caching. Because each side of a relationship
can be accessed from different threads
Bugs item #529931, was opened at 2002-03-14 09:53
You can respond by visiting:
http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=529931group_id=22866
Category: CatalinaBundle
Group: v3.0 Rabbit Hole
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Per Nyfelt (per_nyfelt)
Assigned
It is impossible to call recover in SpySession.java
here is why:
if ( transacted ) {
throw new IllegalStateException( The session is transacted );
}
if ( !transacted ) {
throw new IllegalStateException( The session is not transacted
);
}
This
I was proposing making the relationship object an mbean only to simplify
the startup code/dependencies. If you can do everything in start without
this I think there is no point.
david jencks
On 2002.06.07 10:35:44 -0400 Dain Sundstrom wrote:
I didn't know so many people were using HEAD.
Number of tests run: 606
Successful tests: 601
Errors:4
Failures: 1
[time of test: 7 June 2002 12:33 GMT]
[java.version: 1.3.1]
[java.vendor: Apple Computer, Inc.]
Bugs item #529931, was opened at 2002-03-14 08:53
You can respond by visiting:
http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=529931group_id=22866
Category: CatalinaBundle
Group: v3.0 Rabbit Hole
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Per Nyfelt (per_nyfelt)
Assigned
I have reported it as bug
(http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailaid=565279group_id=22866atid=376685),
and submitted a patch to solve it (#562036
http://sourceforge.net/tracker/index.php?func=detailaid=562036group_id=22866atid=376687),
, but noone seems to notice. So I have to apply it
Number of tests run: 733
Successful tests: 228
Errors:491
Failures: 14
[time of test: 8 June 2002 1:29 GMT]
[java.version: 1.3.0]
[java.vendor: IBM Corporation]
Number of tests run: 733
Successful tests: 229
Errors:491
Failures: 13
[time of test: 8 June 2002 3:9 GMT]
[java.version: 1.3.0]
[java.vendor: IBM Corporation]
21 matches
Mail list logo
