[JBoss-dev] current cvs version can't be built

2002-07-22 Thread Alex Loubyansky
Hello guys, just have checked out cvs for jboss-3.1.0alpha and couldn't build it. compile-classes: [javac] Compiling 165 source files to C:\CVSROOT\jboss-all\messaging\output\classes C:\CVSROOT\jboss-all\messaging\src\main\org\jboss\mq\server\jmx\DelayInterceptor.java:42: cannot resolve

[JBoss-dev] [ jboss-Bugs-583714 ] JBoss-QL IS NOT EMPTY doesn't work

2002-07-22 Thread noreply
Bugs item #583714, was opened at 2002-07-19 10:08 You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=583714group_id=22866 Category: JBossCMP Group: v3.0 Rabbit Hole Status: Closed Resolution: Works For Me Priority: 5 Submitted By: Johan Granlund (johgr814)

[JBoss-dev] Automated JBoss(Branch_3_0) Testsuite Results: 22-July-2002

2002-07-22 Thread scott . stark
Number of tests run: 669 Successful tests: 663 Errors:5 Failures: 1 [time of test: 22 July 2002 0:31 GMT] [java.version: 1.3.1] [java.vendor: Apple Computer, Inc.]

[JBoss-dev] [AUTOMATED] (HEAD) JBoss compilation failed

2002-07-22 Thread chris
= ==THIS IS AN AUTOMATED EMAIL - SEE http://www.lubega.com FOR DETAILS= = JAVA VERSION DETAILS java version 1.3.1_03 Java(TM) 2 Runtime Environment, Standard

[JBoss-dev] [ jboss-Bugs-564513 ] CMP ejb ql parse exception

2002-07-22 Thread noreply
Bugs item #564513, was opened at 2002-06-04 11:42 You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=564513group_id=22866 Category: JBossCMP Group: v3.0 Rabbit Hole Status: Closed Resolution: Invalid Priority: 5 Submitted By: Sudhir Srinivasan (s_sudhir)

[JBoss-dev] [AUTOMATED] (HEAD) JBoss compilation failed

2002-07-22 Thread chris
= ==THIS IS AN AUTOMATED EMAIL - SEE http://www.lubega.com FOR DETAILS= = JAVA VERSION DETAILS java version 1.4.0_01 Java(TM) 2 Runtime Environment, Standard

[JBoss-dev] [ jboss-Bugs-570078 ] 1:1 CMR Problem

2002-07-22 Thread noreply
Bugs item #570078, was opened at 2002-06-17 08:13 You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=570078group_id=22866 Category: JBossCMP Group: v3.0 Rabbit Hole Status: Closed Resolution: Invalid Priority: 5 Submitted By: k (shannu) Assigned to: Dain

[JBoss-dev] [ jboss-Bugs-506969 ] verifier ignores case of CMP field names

2002-07-22 Thread noreply
Bugs item #506969, was opened at 2002-01-22 14:25 You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=506969group_id=22866 Category: JBossServer Group: v2.4 (stable) Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Alexei Yudichev (sflexus) Assigned

[JBoss-dev] [AUTOMATED] (HEAD) JBoss compilation failed

2002-07-22 Thread chris
= ==THIS IS AN AUTOMATED EMAIL - SEE http://www.lubega.com FOR DETAILS= = JAVA VERSION DETAILS java version 1.3.1_03 Java(TM) 2 Runtime Environment, Standard

[JBoss-dev] [AUTOMATED] (HEAD) JBoss compilation failed

2002-07-22 Thread chris
= ==THIS IS AN AUTOMATED EMAIL - SEE http://www.lubega.com FOR DETAILS= = JAVA VERSION DETAILS java version 1.4.0_01 Java(TM) 2 Runtime Environment, Standard

[JBoss-dev] [ jboss-Bugs-580529 ] Transaction and ManagedConnection error

2002-07-22 Thread noreply
Bugs item #580529, was opened at 2002-07-12 13:17 You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=580529group_id=22866 Category: JBossTX Group: v3.0 Rabbit Hole Status: Open Resolution: Accepted Priority: 5 Submitted By: Jacek Bialecki (jacekb) Assigned

[JBoss-dev] [ jboss-Bugs-583066 ] xml comments in ejb-ql cause error

2002-07-22 Thread noreply
Bugs item #583066, was opened at 2002-07-17 23:08 You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=583066group_id=22866 Category: JBossServer Group: v3.0 Rabbit Hole Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Jonathan Tobias (javamartini)

[JBoss-dev] [AUTOMATED] (HEAD) JBoss compilation failed

2002-07-22 Thread chris
= ==THIS IS AN AUTOMATED EMAIL - SEE http://www.lubega.com FOR DETAILS= = JAVA VERSION DETAILS java version 1.3.1_03 Java(TM) 2 Runtime Environment, Standard

[JBoss-dev] [Trivial patch] formatting correction in IncompleteDeploymentException.java

2002-07-22 Thread Jon Evans
Hi, A trivial patch to the output of IncompleteDeploymentException. Newlines are needed after each report line. Jon. --- system/src/main/org/jboss/deployment/IncompleteDeploymentException.java.orig Mon Jul 22 12:39:41 2002 +++

[JBoss-dev] [AUTOMATED] (HEAD) JBoss compilation failed

2002-07-22 Thread chris
= ==THIS IS AN AUTOMATED EMAIL - SEE http://www.lubega.com FOR DETAILS= = JAVA VERSION DETAILS java version 1.4.0_01 Java(TM) 2 Runtime Environment, Standard

[JBoss-dev] [ jboss-Bugs-582428 ] ejb remove cause IllegalStateException

2002-07-22 Thread noreply
Bugs item #582428, was opened at 2002-07-16 22:33 You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=582428group_id=22866 Category: JBossServer Group: v3.0 Rabbit Hole Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Andrew Lau (andrewlau4) Assigned

[JBoss-dev] [ jboss-Bugs-583066 ] xml comments in ejb-ql cause error

2002-07-22 Thread noreply
Bugs item #583066, was opened at 2002-07-17 23:08 You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=583066group_id=22866 Category: JBossServer Group: v3.0 Rabbit Hole Status: Closed Resolution: Fixed Priority: 5 Submitted By: Jonathan Tobias (javamartini)

RE: [JBoss-dev] [AUTOMATED] (HEAD) JBoss compilation failed

2002-07-22 Thread Hiram Chirino
Should be fixed now. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, July 22, 2002 8:19 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [JBoss-dev] [AUTOMATED] (HEAD) JBoss compilation failed

RE: [JBoss-dev] current cvs version can't be built

2002-07-22 Thread Hiram Chirino
try it again.. I forgot to check something in. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Alex Loubyansky Sent: Monday, July 22, 2002 2:54 AM To: JBoss-Dev Subject: [JBoss-dev] current cvs version can't be built Hello guys, just have

Re[2]: [JBoss-dev] current cvs version can't be built

2002-07-22 Thread Alex Loubyansky
Hello Hiram, builds successfully. Thanks! alex Monday, July 22, 2002, 3:43:31 PM, you wrote: HC try it again.. I forgot to check something in. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Alex Loubyansky Sent: Monday, July 22, 2002 2:54 AM

[JBoss-dev] [ jboss-Bugs-585010 ] Startup error with lib added

2002-07-22 Thread noreply
Bugs item #585010, was opened at 2002-07-22 16:55 You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=585010group_id=22866 Category: None Group: None Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Vurti Galka (vurtigalka) Assigned to:

[JBoss-dev] [ jboss-Bugs-585014 ] JBossCMP giving error in dynamic-ql when passing an array with null elements (not used)

2002-07-22 Thread noreply
Bugs item #585014, was opened at 2002-07-22 13:58 You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=585014group_id=22866 Category: JBossCMP Group: v3.0 Rabbit Hole Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Emerson Cargnin (echofloripa)

[JBoss-dev] [ jboss-Bugs-583618 ] Incorrect EJB-QL to SQL translation

2002-07-22 Thread noreply
Bugs item #583618, was opened at 2002-07-18 16:39 You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=583618group_id=22866 Category: JBossCMP Group: v3.0 Rabbit Hole Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Lamar Channell (channell) Assigned

[JBoss-dev] [ jboss-Bugs-585034 ] undefined warning (12.2.2, 12.2.3)

2002-07-22 Thread noreply
Bugs item #585034, was opened at 2002-07-22 12:42 You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=585034group_id=22866 Category: JBossServer Group: v3.0 Rabbit Hole Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: david erdmann (derdmann) Assigned

[JBoss-dev] [ jboss-Bugs-585034 ] undefined warning (12.2.2, 12.2.3)

2002-07-22 Thread noreply
Bugs item #585034, was opened at 2002-07-22 12:42 You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=585034group_id=22866 Category: JBossServer Group: v3.0 Rabbit Hole Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: david erdmann (derdmann) Assigned

[JBoss-dev] [ jboss-Bugs-585034 ] undefined warning (12.2.2, 12.2.3)

2002-07-22 Thread noreply
Bugs item #585034, was opened at 2002-07-22 12:42 You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=585034group_id=22866 Category: JBossServer Group: v3.0 Rabbit Hole Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: david erdmann (derdmann) Assigned

[JBoss-dev] [ jboss-Bugs-585034 ] undefined warning (12.2.2, 12.2.3)

2002-07-22 Thread noreply
Bugs item #585034, was opened at 2002-07-22 12:42 You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=585034group_id=22866 Category: JBossServer Group: v3.0 Rabbit Hole Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: david erdmann (derdmann) Assigned

[JBoss-dev] [ jboss-Bugs-585034 ] undefined warning (12.2.2, 12.2.3)

2002-07-22 Thread noreply
Bugs item #585034, was opened at 2002-07-22 19:42 You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=585034group_id=22866 Category: JBossServer Group: v3.0 Rabbit Hole Status: Closed Resolution: Fixed Priority: 5 Submitted By: david erdmann (derdmann)

[JBoss-dev] [ jboss-Bugs-585034 ] undefined warning (12.2.2, 12.2.3)

2002-07-22 Thread noreply
Bugs item #585034, was opened at 2002-07-22 19:42 You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=585034group_id=22866 Category: JBossServer Group: v3.0 Rabbit Hole Status: Closed Resolution: Fixed Priority: 5 Submitted By: david erdmann (derdmann)

[JBoss-dev] Automated JBoss(Branch_3_0) Testsuite Results: 22-July-2002

2002-07-22 Thread scott . stark
Number of tests run: 669 Successful tests: 663 Errors:6 Failures: 0 [time of test: 22 July 2002 12:31 GMT] [java.version: 1.3.1] [java.vendor: Apple Computer, Inc.]

[JBoss-dev] [ jboss-Bugs-585010 ] Startup error with lib added

2002-07-22 Thread noreply
Bugs item #585010, was opened at 2002-07-22 16:55 You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=585010group_id=22866 Category: None Group: None Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Vurti Galka (vurtigalka) Assigned to:

RE: [JBoss-dev] Hypersonic 1.7 final released

2002-07-22 Thread Jason Dillon
Do we know if they have implemented better support for embedded use? I remember Peter (or someone) saying they were considering using our patch for this, but who knows. It would be nice if they have some option so we don't have to hack it up to embed it properly... perhaps it won't spit out to

[JBoss-dev] service description for sapdb

2002-07-22 Thread Kasper Nielsen
Hi, I've attached a Service descriptor for the Sapdb database - Kasper ?xml version=1.0 encoding=UTF-8? !-- = -- !-- -- !-- JBoss Server Configuration

[JBoss-dev] [ jboss-Change Notes-585166 ] XSL based deployment w/datasource exampl

2002-07-22 Thread noreply
Change Notes item #585166, was opened at 2002-07-22 23:20 You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=381174aid=585166group_id=22866 Category: JBoss/System Group: v3.1 Status: Open Priority: 5 Submitted By: David Jencks (d_jencks) Assigned to: David Jencks

[JBoss-dev] Automated JBoss(HEAD WonderLand) Testsuite Results: 23-July-2002

2002-07-22 Thread chris
Number of tests run: 844 Successful tests: 374 Errors:455 Failures: 15 [time of test: 23 July 2002 0:56 GMT] [java.version: 1.3.1_03] [java.vendor: Sun Microsystems

[JBoss-dev] New JBossMQ IL : OIL2

2002-07-22 Thread Hiram Chirino
Hi guys, Just wanted to let you guys know about a new Invocation Layer for JBossMQ. It's called OIL2 because it's closest relative is the current OIL Invocation Layer. I'm very exited about this new IL because it has some very nice performance features. It has low serialization over-head like