Can you make public the name of this good profiler?.
Thanks,
Alin
- Original Message -
From: Rhett Aultman [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, September 23, 2002 5:32 AM
Subject: RE: [JBoss-dev] Health monitoring
I believe it's possible, but I'm still plugging at it.
Michael Bartmann wrote:
Dain Sundstrom wrote:
Do we run daily tests on 1.4 anymore?
Is anyone running in production on 1.4?
We also do, but
We are. But we use 3.2, where there is no daily test anyway.
Biggest issues:
- memory leak
we have seen this too. Had to insert more memory to
Hi Greg,
Looks cool. BTW, it might be worth using a combination of the serial number
and issuer if the subjectDN doesn't work, since the issuer on its own won't
be unique and I think this will thwart the jboss authentication caching on
principal.
I have been using the following function to get
The native code profiler I've been working with is an open-source C++ profiler called
jProf. I don't have a URL handy, but a Google search will turn it up.
-Original Message-
From: Alin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tue 9/24/2002 4:04 AM
To:
Rhett Aultman wrote:
The native code profiler I've been working with is an open-source C++ profiler
called jProf. I don't have a URL handy, but a Google search will turn it up.
http://starship.python.net/crew/garyp/jProf.html
---
This
Bugs item #506969, was opened at 2002-01-22 14:25
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=506969group_id=22866
Category: JBossServer
Group: v2.4 (stable)
Status: Closed
Resolution: Wont Fix
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Alexei Yudichev (sflexus)
Bugs item #613360, was opened at 2002-09-23 21:00
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=613360group_id=22866
Category: JBossServer
Group: v3.2
Status: Open
Resolution: Accepted
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Dain Sundstrom (dsundstrom)
Assigned to:
Bugs item #613809, was opened at 2002-09-24 15:01
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=613809group_id=22866
Category: CatalinaBundle
Group: None
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Alexander Opitz (opi)
Assigned to: Scott M
Bugs item #613360, was opened at 2002-09-23 21:00
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=613360group_id=22866
Category: JBossServer
Group: v3.2
Status: Open
Resolution: Accepted
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Dain Sundstrom (dsundstrom)
Assigned to:
Matt,
For getting the client-side invocations and stub classes right, we recommend
The following steps:
A) generate wsdl from the deployed web services.
B) generate stub classes from the wsdl using wsdl2java.
Using Axis/MbeanInvocationHandler lacks a lot of deployment information
The JMS DestinationManager is not adding Remote JMS queue/topics into it's
hashmap of destinations when using JMSProviderLoader that has a ProviderUrl
that points to another JBoss instance that houses the queues/topics. I
added some trace logging to the JMSDestinationManager that dumps the
CGJ,
Thanks for your response.
A) generate wsdl from the deployed web services.
B) generate stub classes from the wsdl using wsdl2java.
This is the first thing that I tried and it did not work. I didn't take a
lot of time to firgure out why this is the case, since the jboss.net
testcase
Bugs item #613882, was opened at 2002-09-24 08:34
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=613882group_id=22866
Category: JBossWeb
Group: v3.0 Rabbit Hole
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Scott M Stark (starksm)
Assigned to:
Michael Bartmann wrote:
Dain Sundstrom wrote:
Do we run daily tests on 1.4 anymore?
Is anyone running in production on 1.4?
We are. But we use 3.2, where there is no daily test anyway.
Biggest issues:
- memory leak
- Clients with 1.3 fail to connect to JMS-OIL-Topics, but succeed
I merged some additional web integration tests from 3.0 and 3.2 and now both
branches are failing the WebIntegrationUnitTestCase.testBadWarRedeploy and
WebIntegrationUnitTestCase.testBadEarRedeploy tests. This is a different failure
from the previous hot redeployment problem as in this case the
Jason,
After just seeing a jboss presentation (by danch btw), I was
thinking about this too (I had just seen the AspectJ stuff
before). I could see creating an AspectDeployer and the
notion of an aspect-archive (aar) - the aspect-j code inside
would then be compiled on deployment using the
Bugs item #583618, was opened at 2002-07-19 05:39
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=583618group_id=22866
Category: JBossCMP
Group: v3.0 Rabbit Hole
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Lamar Channell (channell)
Assigned
Dain Sundstrom wrote:
Michael Bartmann wrote:
Dain Sundstrom wrote:
Do we run daily tests on 1.4 anymore?
Is anyone running in production on 1.4?
We are. But we use 3.2, where there is no daily test anyway.
Biggest issues:
- memory leak
- Clients with 1.3 fail to connect to
I have got it uploaded now. It was a stupid checkbox that had to be checked to have it
upload anything (can't understand why it is there).
Anyway: I did some testing of it, but it seems the run-as-role LoginModule is used
outside the loginmodule also (in calls not gone thru any loginmodule. So
Bugs item #609132, was opened at 2002-09-13 17:58
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=609132group_id=22866
Category: Build System
Group: v3.2
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Ulrich Romahn (diggermaus)
Assigned to: Jason
Bugs item #609132, was opened at 2002-09-13 15:58
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=609132group_id=22866
Category: Build System
Group: v3.2
Status: Closed
Resolution: Fixed
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Ulrich Romahn (diggermaus)
Assigned to:
Bugs item #614038, was opened at 2002-09-24 22:50
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=614038group_id=22866
Category: JBossServer
Group: v3.2
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Sven Luzar (sven_luzar)
Assigned to:
Bugs item #598686, was opened at 2002-08-22 02:52
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=598686group_id=22866
Category: JBossServer
Group: v3.0 Rabbit Hole
Status: Closed
Resolution: Fixed
Priority: 7
Submitted By: Nick Ganju (nganju)
Assigned
Bugs item #604258, was opened at 2002-09-03 16:52
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=604258group_id=22866
Category: JBossSX
Group: v3.0 Rabbit Hole
Status: Closed
Resolution: Rejected
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Steve Lynch (aaprincipal)
Bugs item #597216, was opened at 2002-08-19 09:34
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=597216group_id=22866
Category: JBossWeb
Group: v3.0 Rabbit Hole
Status: Closed
Resolution: Fixed
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Georg Schmid (giorgio42)
Assigned
Bugs item #610552, was opened at 2002-09-17 06:51
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=610552group_id=22866
Category: JBossServer
Group: v3.0 Rabbit Hole
Status: Closed
Resolution: Fixed
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Alexei Yudichev (sflexus)
Bugs item #611270, was opened at 2002-09-18 13:33
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=611270group_id=22866
Category: JBossServer
Group: v3.0 Rabbit Hole
Status: Closed
Resolution: Duplicate
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Nathan W. Phelps (nphelps)
Bugs item #594580, was opened at 2002-08-13 06:16
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=594580group_id=22866
Category: Build System
Group: v3.0 Rabbit Hole
Status: Closed
Resolution: Invalid
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Peter Callies (pcallies)
Bugs item #597713, was opened at 2002-08-20 04:24
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=597713group_id=22866
Category: JBossServer
Group: v3.0 Rabbit Hole
Status: Closed
Resolution: Invalid
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Joao Machado (joaocm)
Bugs item #565804, was opened at 2002-06-07 06:09
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=565804group_id=22866
Category: None
Group: v3.0 Rabbit Hole
Status: Closed
Resolution: Fixed
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Andrew Thorn (sigbur)
Assigned to:
Is the following bug fix of JBOSS JMS JbossQ included in any JBOSS
releases yet?
[ 526696 ] session.recover() doesn't work
It appears that any of current JBOSS releases doesnt incorporate latest
JbossQ JMS component build. Above fix is submitted 2 months back. So
when this fix appears in
I'm testing some code against HEAD and I saw that there's some changes
at oracle-service.xml format.
did the attribute name=JndiNameOracleDS/attribute
attribute was moved out of the mbean
code=org.jboss.resource.connectionmanager.RARDeployment... tag???
--
|
I managed to make oracle-service work (although i didn't undertand why
the place of jndi attribute was changed)
when deploying a ear that worked fine in 3.0.1 in HEAD (4.0.0ALPHA) i
got the following error :
19:23:36,595 ERROR [MainDeployer] could not start deployment:
Bugs item #614116, was opened at 2002-09-24 16:56
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=614116group_id=22866
Category: JBossTX
Group: v3.0 Rabbit Hole
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Elias Ross (genman)
Assigned to:
Yes. I strongly suggest you use the *-ds.xml files instedad of the
*-service.xml files for datasource setup in 3.2 and head.
david jencks
On 2002.09.24 18:14:24 -0400 Emerson Cargnin - SICREDI Serviços wrote:
I'm testing some code against HEAD and I saw that there's some changes
at
Number of tests run: 960
Successful tests: 933
Errors:20
Failures: 7
[time of test: 25 September 2002 1:51 GMT]
[java.version: 1.3.1_03]
[java.vendor: Sun
David Jencks wrote:
Yes.
is there any reason for that? this question is becouse that this kind of
change generates a lot of trouble (and questions to jboss-user list)
when upgrading the server.
I strongly suggest you use the *-ds.xml files instedad of the
*-service.xml files for
On 2002.09.24 21:11:36 -0400 Emerson Cargnin - SICREDI Serviços wrote:
David Jencks wrote:
Yes.
is there any reason for that? this question is becouse that this kind of
change generates a lot of trouble (and questions to jboss-user list)
when upgrading the server.
Putting the
Change Notes item #614198, was opened at 2002-09-24 23:54
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=381174aid=614198group_id=22866
Category: None
Group: v3.2
Status: Open
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Bill Burke (patriot1burke)
Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous
Bugs item #580594, was opened at 2002-07-12 10:12
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=580594group_id=22866
Category: JBossServer
Group: v3.0 Rabbit Hole
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Scott M Stark (starksm)
Assigned
Bugs item #580594, was opened at 2002-07-12 10:12
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=580594group_id=22866
Category: JBossServer
Group: v3.0 Rabbit Hole
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Scott M Stark (starksm)
Assigned
Bugs item #580594, was opened at 2002-07-12 10:12
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=580594group_id=22866
Category: JBossServer
Group: v3.0 Rabbit Hole
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Scott M Stark (starksm)
Assigned
Bugs item #605878, was opened at 2002-09-06 21:00
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=605878group_id=22866
Category: JBossServer
Group: v3.2
Status: Closed
Resolution: Duplicate
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Archimedes Trajano (trajano)
Assigned
43 matches
Mail list logo
