Bugs item #616546, was opened at 2002-09-30 15:48
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=616546group_id=22866
Category: JBossMX
Group: v3.2
Status: Open
Resolution: Invalid
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Georg Schmid (giorgio42)
Assigned to:
Bugs item #613360, was opened at 2002-09-23 21:00
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=613360group_id=22866
Category: JBossServer
Group: v3.2
Status: Closed
Resolution: Fixed
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Dain Sundstrom (dsundstrom)
Assigned to:
Bugs item #613349, was opened at 2002-09-23 20:34
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=613349group_id=22866
Category: JBossServer
Group: v3.2
Status: Closed
Resolution: Fixed
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Dain Sundstrom (dsundstrom)
Assigned to:
Bugs item #594563, was opened at 2002-08-13 05:18
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=594563group_id=22866
Category: CatalinaBundle
Group: v3.0 Rabbit Hole
Status: Closed
Resolution: Fixed
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Jeff Miner (jeff_miner)
Juha Group,
make sure you add the getMethod and setMethod mapping to your MMB
attributes.
Thanks. I did this and started re-reading your JMX book. I now have a new
error :)
Below, I include my MBean Info generation code, and some error output. When
I try to view the jmx-console page for
do you have operation info for the operation names you are mapping to
(setId getId)?
On Tue, 1 Oct 2002, Matt Munz wrote:
Juha Group,
make sure you add the getMethod and setMethod mapping to your MMB
attributes.
Thanks. I did this and started re-reading your JMX book. I now have a
Thank you, David.
This is exactly the behaviour I am looking for.
David Jencks wrote:
This is in HEAD and 3.2. Both Local and XAConnectionManagers are wrappers
around TxConnectionManager. In XA and TxConnectionManager you can set
TrackConnectionByTx to eliminate all intermediate
Juha,
do you have operation info for the operation names you are mapping to
(setId getId)?
Nope, and I now see where this causes the problem. At least I'm learning...
Thanks for all the assistance.
- Matt
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On
I'm working on a bug 576410.
The problem is that we need a Set implementation that will order
elements by its addition to the set. I called it SequencedSet.
There are two main approaches: implement it from scratch extending
AbstractSet or on top of something.
I talked with Dain and he advised me
Bugs item #595672, was opened at 2002-08-15 18:28
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=595672group_id=22866
Category: JBossCMP
Group: v3.0 Rabbit Hole
Status: Open
Resolution: Wont Fix
Priority: 8
Submitted By: Boris Tamarkin (upss)
Assigned
Title: FW: [JBoss-dev] XADataSource wrapper for JBoss 4
Hi Igor.
I applied the patchand initially found the
XAResourceTest tests ran successfully a number of times. Ive found that after
running the XAResourceTest, if l leave SQL Server running,stop and start
JBoss and then run the test
I suspect this might be a limitation of the current jboss XidFactory...
namely it starts over with global ids every time you restart jboss. If you
leave SQLServer running, it may object if it gets the same xid later on
that it committed earlier. Is there an easy way to see if this is the
No, my entity name is:
!DOCTYPE jbosscmp-jdbc PUBLIC
-//JBoss//DTD JBOSS-CMP-JDBC 3.0//EN
http://www.jboss.org/j2ee/dtd/jbosscmp-jdbc_3_0.dtd;
Which I took from a jbosscmp-jdbc.xml from jboss/testsuite.
On the side it would be nice if we had pages on jboss.org which
describes each of
Number of tests run: 976
Successful tests: 959
Errors:15
Failures: 2
[time of test: 2 October 2002 1:50 GMT]
[java.version: 1.3.1_03]
[java.vendor: Sun Microsystems
Bugs item #481358, was opened at 2001-11-13 09:07
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=481358group_id=22866
Category: JBossTX
Group: None
Status: Open
Resolution: Accepted
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Daniel OConnor (docodan)
Assigned to: Andreas
Bugs item #614116, was opened at 2002-09-24 19:56
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=614116group_id=22866
Category: JBossTX
Group: v3.0 Rabbit Hole
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Elias Ross (genman)
Assigned to:
Bugs item #614116, was opened at 2002-09-24 16:56
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=614116group_id=22866
Category: JBossTX
Group: v3.0 Rabbit Hole
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Elias Ross (genman)
Assigned to:
Bugs item #565237, was opened at 2002-06-06 04:31
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=565237group_id=22866
Category: JBossServer
Group: v3.0 Rabbit Hole
Status: Closed
Resolution: Fixed
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Stephen Coy (scoy)
Assigned to:
On Mon, 30 Sep 2002, Sacha Labourey wrote:
Hello,
I've just commited a generic cache-invalidation mechansim to HEAD (mainly in
org.jboss.cache.invalidation). Some of the code and ideas comes from Bill
Burke's implementation of the Seppuku algorithm that has been recently
commited.
drool!
19 matches
Mail list logo
