Hi,
I think it's the "ulimit" command.
See http://www.unidata.ucar.edu/cgi-bin/man-cgi?ulimit+1 for more infos.
Laurent
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Dain
Sent: mardi 19 novembre 2002 22:55
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [JBoss-dev]
Bugs item #640991, was opened at 2002-11-20 00:15
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=376685&aid=640991&group_id=22866
Category: JBossCMP
Group: v3.0 Rabbit Hole
Status: Closed
Resolution: Duplicate
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Adam Heath (doogie)
Assigned
Bugs item #640991, was opened at 2002-11-19 18:15
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=376685&aid=640991&group_id=22866
Category: JBossCMP
Group: v3.0 Rabbit Hole
>Status: Closed
>Resolution: Duplicate
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Adam Heath (doogie)
>Assign
Bugs item #640991, was opened at 2002-11-19 16:15
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=376685&aid=640991&group_id=22866
Category: JBossCMP
Group: v3.0 Rabbit Hole
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Adam Heath (doogie)
Assigned to: Nob
Bugs item #640991, was opened at 2002-11-20 00:15
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=376685&aid=640991&group_id=22866
Category: JBossCMP
Group: v3.0 Rabbit Hole
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Adam Heath (doogie)
Assigned to: Nob
Bugs item #640991, was opened at 2002-11-20 00:15
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=376685&aid=640991&group_id=22866
Category: JBossCMP
Group: v3.0 Rabbit Hole
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Adam Heath (doogie)
Assigned to: Nob
On Tuesday, November 19, 2002, at 06:09 PM, Stefan Arentz wrote:
On Tuesday, Nov 19, 2002, at 23:40 Europe/Amsterdam, marc fleury wrote:
most of the development has been taken to the *private* jboss-group
list. However we are bringing this development back on the forums
soon,
Marc, that sou
Bugs item #640991, was opened at 2002-11-20 00:15
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=376685&aid=640991&group_id=22866
Category: JBossCMP
Group: v3.0 Rabbit Hole
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Adam Heath (doogie)
Assigned to: Nob
Bugs item #640991, was opened at 2002-11-20 00:15
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=376685&aid=640991&group_id=22866
Category: JBossCMP
Group: v3.0 Rabbit Hole
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Adam Heath (doogie)
Assigned to: Nob
On Tuesday, Nov 19, 2002, at 23:40 Europe/Amsterdam, marc fleury wrote:
most of the development has been taken to the *private* jboss-group
list. However we are bringing this development back on the forums
soon,
Marc, that sounds really good! Even if we are not 'allowed' to join the
group, i
Number of tests run: 1023
Successful tests: 1014
Errors:7
Failures: 2
[time of test: 2002-11-19.23-12 GMT]
[java.version: 1.4.1_01]
[java.vendor: Sun Microsystems Inc.]
most of the development has been taken to the *private* jboss-group
list. However we are bringing this development back on the forums soon,
marc f
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On
> Behalf Of Stefan Arentz
> Sent: Tuesday, November 19, 2002
FULL 2002 YAPIMI PORNO VIDEOLAR
Sitemize yeni filmler eklendi. Tam metraj, full kalite
Yenilenen Kategoriler:
AMATEUR
ANAL
ASIAN
LESBIAN
Ýyi eðlenceler,
http://www.noseks.com
id: jboss-development - ujdgfpoumoimptqmqec-
N¬±ùÞµéX¬²'²Þu¼¢W®{ay¶¬Ë(~Ǻ¸§*
They didn't fix 1.3 and don't plan to, IIRC. They are focusing all of their
man power on getting 1.4.1 up, stable, and fast.
> From: Dain <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Date: Tue, 19 Nov 2002 11:20:50 -0600
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [JBoss-dev] Shutdown hooks brok
On Tuesday, November 19, 2002, at 03:39 PM, Emerson Cargnin - SICREDI
Serviços wrote:
I made some changes in the test in a way you can distinguish between
pooled and not pooled calls and with creating each proxy or not :
testPooledOldProxy(org.jboss.test.pooled.test.BeanStressTestCase)Succes
Number of tests run: 1030
Successful tests: 1012
Errors:15
Failures: 3
[time of test: 2002-11-19.20-44 GMT]
[java.version: 1.3.1_05]
[java.vendor: Sun Microsystems Inc.
I made some changes in the test in a way you can distinguish between
pooled and not pooled calls and with creating each proxy or not :
testPooledOldProxy(org.jboss.test.pooled.test.BeanStressTestCase)Success 20.357
testPooledNewProxy(org.jboss.test.pooled.test.BeanStressTestCase)Success
45.860 t
On Tue, 2002-11-19 at 09:03, Sacha Labourey wrote:
> and what if you type "SET ANT=" (on Windows) before launching the build
> script: in this case the appropriate ANT version (as provided as part of the
> JBoss build environment) will be used.
Sacha,
I'm running into the same problem as Christi
On Tuesday, Nov 19, 2002, at 18:20 Europe/Amsterdam, Dain wrote:
On Tuesday, November 19, 2002, at 04:53 AM, Hunter Hillegas wrote:
In the case of OS X, it was an acknowledged bug that is now fixed.
Do I have to use 1.4 or do they have it fixed in a 1.3 version?
I'm using the DP5 1.4.1 rel
Number of tests run: 995
Successful tests: 987
Errors:7
Failures: 1
[time of test: 2002-11-19.11-56 GMT]
[java.version: 1.3.1]
[java.vendor: Apple Computer, Inc.]
[java
This error is showing up when running the default config of the 3.2 branch due
to the JavaGroups jar not being available in this config. This should not be printed
as an error.
10:36:14,338 ERROR [jbossweb] problem configuring Jetty:
java.lang.ClassNotFoundException: Unexpected error during load o
On Tuesday, November 19, 2002, at 04:53 AM, Hunter Hillegas wrote:
In the case of OS X, it was an acknowledged bug that is now fixed.
Do I have to use 1.4 or do they have it fixed in a 1.3 version?
-dain
---
This sf.net email is sponsored
and what if you type "SET ANT=" (on Windows) before launching the build
script: in this case the appropriate ANT version (as provided as part of the
JBoss build environment) will be used.
> -Message d'origine-
> De : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]De la part de
> Christian R
I have updated 3.2 to Ant 1.5.1 as that is what I am testing with for the 3.2beta2
release.
Scott Stark
Chief Technology Officer
JBoss Group, LLC
- Original Message -
From: "Christian Riege" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "JBoss Dev list" <[EMA
hi,
On Tue, 2002-11-19 at 16:17, Scott M Stark wrote:
> A clean build of a "cvs -r Branch_3_2 jboss-3.2" is working for me.
>
it is something related to my local ant installation (which i upgraded
to 1.5.1 recently) and the differing ant versions in the three branches.
3.0 uses Ant 1.4 -- works
Hi,
Is there a release plan for 3.2 final? I don't see much traffic about
that on this list, how is release coordinated between the most active
committers?
S.
---
This sf.net email is sponsored by: To learn the basics of securing
your we
A clean build of a "cvs -r Branch_3_2 jboss-3.2" is working for me.
Scott Stark
Chief Technology Officer
JBoss Group, LLC
- Original Message -
From: "Christian Riege" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "JBoss Dev list" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tues
hi,
i just noticed that apparently Branch_3_2 doesn't build?! I had problems
with Branch_3_0 today but I resolved these w/ a fresh checkout using
cvs -d:ext:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/cvsroot/jboss co -rBranch_3_0
jboss-3.0
i tried the same with Branch_3_2 (fresh checkout) but ant keeps
complaining:
--
That's
the way It kinda works now, but I don't like it because it's not
generalized. We don't have to do that with RMI proxies today, why do we
have to do that with trunk proxies? And RMI proxy could be sent down the
the invocation as an argument and all would be ok. You should be able to
Bugs item #637269, was opened at 2002-11-12 18:04
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=376685&aid=637269&group_id=22866
Category: JBossCMP
Group: v3.2
Status: Closed
Resolution: Invalid
Priority: 5
Submitted By: rodelor (rodelor)
Assigned to: Adrian Brock
In the case of OS X, it was an acknowledged bug that is now fixed.
> From: Stephen Coy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Date: Tue, 19 Nov 2002 21:20:51 +1100
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [JBoss-dev] Shutdown hooks broken on OS X
>
> In my experience, shutdown hooks do
The shutdown hooks do work on some versions of UNIX at least. I have been
using them with Solaris 2.6 and 2.8 and JDK 1.3.x
successfully for a long period.
-Original Message-
From: Stephen Coy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 19 November 2002 10:21
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [JBoss
Yeah. Apple's 1.3.1 JVM doesn't catch the signal and implement the shutdown
correctly.
This is fixed in Apple's 1.4.1 Developer Preview 5 JVM, which is available
for free at connect.apple.com after you signup.
Most of the work remaining on the 1.4.1 JVM is GUI stuff. It's been running
JBoss great
In my experience, shutdown hooks don't work reliably on *any* version
of unix.
I was building a command line driven server style of app in java about
a year ago and discovered this.
Tried it on MacOS X (first), and then thinking it was just the Mac,
tried it on solaris (the deployment platform
The shutdown hooks don't seem to work on OS X (10.2.2). When I press
ctrl-c or apple+. the VM just stops cold. Has anyone seen this? I am
using the following version of java:
bash-2.05a$ java -version
java version "1.3.1"
Java(TM) 2 Runtime Environment, Standard Edition (build
1.3.1-root_1.3.
Why
does the proxy object have to setup the callback channel on
deserialization? Just stuff the proxy in the invocation object as party of
the payload. Invoker pulls this proxy shell out of the invocation and
initializes it with the real callback channel..
-Original Message-From
36 matches
Mail list logo
