I just fixed the errors in jbosscmp-jdbc_3_2.dtd (3.2/HEAD) and
jbosscmp-jdbc_4_0.dtd.
And I met one more:
Main XmlFileLoader: File D:\work\temp\standardjbosscmp-jdbc.xml process error.
Line: 23. Error message: Element type time-out must be declared.
Main XmlFileLoader: File
Title: Gratest XXX content
BEDAVA RESÝMLER
Group:Gurup takýlanlar
Blowjob:Üflemeli çalgýlar
Shaved:Traþlý sevenlere
Asian:Ateþli Asyalýlar
Virgin:Bakire kýzlar burada
Black:Zenci güzelleri
Pornstar:Porno yýldýzlarý
Threesome:Üçlü takýlanlar
Hardcore:Sýký takýlanlar
Anime:Çizgi porno
After deploy tyrex-tm-plugin I get next exception
java.lang.IllegalStateException: The transaction is not yet or no longer
active
2003-06-26 18:34:08,733 ERROR [org.jboss.ejb.EntityContainer] Starting
failed
java.lang.IllegalStateException: The transaction is not yet or no longer
active
at
We will not be supporting the Tyrex transaction manager anymore unless you
want to take over the integration.
Bill Burke
Chief Architect
JBoss Group, LLC
Cast your vote for JBoss as JDJ Best App Server
http://www.sys-con.com/java/readerschoice2003/vote.cfm
The time-out element is the legacy JAWS equivalent of read-time-out, in
seconds rather than milliseconds. This should be read-time-out.
--
Scott Stark
Chief Technology Officer
JBoss Group, LLC
Alexey Loubyansky wrote:
I just fixed the errors in
Most likely this is caused by bugs 731349 and/or 731363. These should
be fixed in jb4. I've been offered a patch for 3.2 from a commercial
company whose product depends on these bugs being fixed but it is
unclear if JBossGroup will allow it to be applied. AFAIK no one wants
to fix these
This one time, at band camp, Bill Burke said:
BBWe will not be supporting the Tyrex transaction manager anymore unless you
BBwant to take over the integration.
I'm just curious, why was this decision made? Who used to maintain
this integration?
Bruce
--
perl -e 'print unpack(u30,0G)[EMAIL
Read this post.
http://www.mail-archive.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/msg09106.ht
ml
Adrian Brock
Director of Support
Back Office
JBoss Group, LLC
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Bruce
Hi David,
I'm gradually working my way through the same patch for 3.2 now as
we speak.
Regards,
Adrian
Adrian Brock
Director of Support
Back Office
JBoss Group, LLC
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL
Anatoly Akkerman was maintaining it a lnnng time ago. Nobody really
uses it or used it. I think the project is dead since their last release
was May 2002 and they only have one CVS committer.
http://sourceforge.net/projects/tyrex/
Bill
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
The Tyrex integration was done by Anatoly Akkerman([EMAIL PROTECTED])
and it never reached a production quality service. Arbitrary stuff is
allowed in the codebase for experimentation, we only support production
level efforts that are maintained.
--
Scott Stark
Chief
Bugs item #761288, was opened at 2003-06-26 16:38
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by rodburgett
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=761288group_id=22866
Category: JBossServer
Group: v3.2
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority:
Bugs item #761288, was opened at 2003-06-26 16:38
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by rodburgett
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=761288group_id=22866
Category: JBossServer
Group: v3.2
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority:
Bugs item #731343, was opened at 2003-05-02 13:42
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by ejort
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=731343group_id=22866
Category: JBossCX
Group: v3.2
Status: Open
Resolution: Accepted
Priority: 5
Bugs item #731349, was opened at 2003-05-02 13:50
Message generated for change (Settings changed) made by ejort
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=731349group_id=22866
Category: JBossCX
Group: v3.2
Status: Open
Resolution: Accepted
Priority: 7
Bugs item #743097, was opened at 2003-05-25 10:33
Message generated for change (Settings changed) made by ejort
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=743097group_id=22866
Category: JBossTX
Group: v3.2
Status: Open
Resolution: Accepted
Priority: 5
Bugs item #731363, was opened at 2003-05-02 14:10
Message generated for change (Settings changed) made by ejort
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=731363group_id=22866
Category: JBossTX
Group: v3.2
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 7
Bugs item #761288, was opened at 2003-06-26 16:38
Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=761288group_id=22866
Category: JBossServer
Group: v3.2
Status: Open
Resolution:
Bugs item #761288, was opened at 2003-06-26 09:38
Message generated for change (Settings changed) made by starksm
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=761288group_id=22866
Category: JBossServer
Group: v3.2
Status: Open
Resolution: Accepted
Bugs item #743097, was opened at 2003-05-25 10:33
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by ejort
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=743097group_id=22866
Category: JBossTX
Group: v3.2
Status: Open
Resolution: Accepted
Priority: 5
Bugs item #758219, was opened at 2003-06-20 16:19
Message generated for change (Settings changed) made by starksm
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=758219group_id=22866
Category: JBossMX
Group: v3.2
Status: Open
Resolution: Accepted
Priority:
Bugs item #758211, was opened at 2003-06-20 15:58
Message generated for change (Settings changed) made by starksm
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=758211group_id=22866
Category: JBossMX
Group: v3.2
Status: Open
Resolution: Accepted
Priority:
Bugs item #742633, was opened at 2003-05-24 02:12
Message generated for change (Settings changed) made by starksm
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=742633group_id=22866
Category: JBossWeb
Group: v3.2
Status: Closed
Resolution: Wont Fix
Bugs item #742633, was opened at 2003-05-24 04:12
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by lhankins
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=742633group_id=22866
Category: JBossWeb
Group: v3.2
Status: Closed
Resolution: Wont Fix
Maybe this is a production DTM option
http://www.arjuna.com/products/jboss/index.html although I don't know the
cost.
Cheers,
Fred
-Original Message-
From: Scott M Stark [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, June 26, 2003 12:23 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [JBoss-dev] Tyrex
They are actually one of our partners.
Bill
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Fred
Hartman
Sent: Thursday, June 26, 2003 4:42 PM
To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Subject: RE: [JBoss-dev] Tyrex transaction manager
Maybe this is a production
Bugs item #760165, was opened at 2003-06-24 23:57
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by l7leungsun
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=760165group_id=22866
Category: JBossCMP
Group: v3.2
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Scott M Stark wrote:
Simply because Tomcat is the defacto standard and the default choice for
most of our users and I'm not happy with the level of integration we
currently offer.
For those of you who are using Jetty and are happy with that choice, I
just want to assure you that regardless of
So why was this change made? There is a difference between yelling at
the user for running under a scenario with potentially n^2 related
performance degradation and breaking a working app.
--
Scott Stark
Chief Technology Officer
JBoss Group, LLC
We will continue to use Jetty no matter. Our experience has been much
better with
Jetty than Tomcat.
On Thursday, June 26, 2003, at 06:30 PM, Greg Wilkins wrote:
Scott M Stark wrote:
Simply because Tomcat is the defacto standard and the default choice
for most of our users and I'm not happy
30 matches
Mail list logo
