Re: [JBoss-dev] anonymous CVS is dead

2003-07-10 Thread Michael Barker
Hi, The snapshots do not appear to contain the new JMS code. Is there a separate snapshot for this? Thanks, On Thu, 2003-07-10 at 01:07, Scott M Stark wrote: Daily snapshots are available from here: http://jboss.sourceforge.net/snapshots/ -- Michael Barker [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Antwort: RE: c/s JBossMQ status, was: [JBoss-dev] JBossMQ rewrite

2003-07-10 Thread ulf . schroeter
The current JMS rewrite by Nathan, Adrian, and Bela is going quite well and we will be replacing the old system in the fall. Don't work on a codebase that is going to be retired and needs to live in depracated mode for awhile. A refactoring isn't what is needed in the JMS subsystem. I don't want

[JBoss-dev] [ jboss-Feature Requests-769045 ] XMBeanAware Interface

2003-07-10 Thread SourceForge.net
Feature Requests item #769045, was opened at 2003-07-10 13:09 Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376688aid=769045group_id=22866 Category: JBossMX Group: v3.2 Status: Open

RE: [JBoss-dev] multiple deployment info entries for invoker.war

2003-07-10 Thread Rod Burgett
I noticed that removeDeployer does a first-to-last traversal of deploymentList. I wondered if that was an oversight or part of some strategy that wasn't obvious to me. But, it gets uglier. Commenting MainDeployer.shutdown() produces a batch of warnings from ServiceController.shutdown(), it

[JBoss-dev] [ jboss-Bugs-769139 ] entityCtx.getEJBLocalObject() returns wrong instance

2003-07-10 Thread SourceForge.net
Bugs item #769139, was opened at 2003-07-10 17:03 Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=769139group_id=22866 Category: JBossServer Group: v3.2 Status: Open Resolution:

RE: [JBoss-dev] ClassCastException from ProxyCompiler$Proxy35.getId(generated)

2003-07-10 Thread Nathan Blair
I was getting these last night on 3.2.1 using JSPs. In my case, I redeployed my EJBs and JSPs and the ClassCastException went away. Hope this helps... Nate -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, July 10, 2003 9:28 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [JBoss-dev] ClassCastException from ProxyCompiler$Proxy35.getId(generated)

2003-07-10 Thread Alexey Loubyansky
Hello Michael, at the moment, I can't comment on why findAll works. The cause, perhapsm is the types mismatch between the one that is used by MySQL driver for generated keys be default and the one you use for primary key column. AFAIK, MySQL's default is java.lang.Integer. Abstracting from

Re: [JBoss-dev] anonymous CVS is dead

2003-07-10 Thread Scott M Stark
Sacha said yesterdays snapshot was truncated. Todays definitely has it: http://jboss.sourceforge.net/snapshots/jboss-head-snapshot.tar.gz -- Scott Stark Chief Technology Officer JBoss Group, LLC Michael Barker wrote: Hi, The snapshots do not

RE: [JBoss-dev] ClassCastException from ProxyCompiler$Proxy35.getId(generated)

2003-07-10 Thread MNewcomb
From: Alexey Loubyansky [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Hello Michael, at the moment, I can't comment on why findAll works. The cause, perhapsm is the types mismatch between the one that is used by MySQL driver for generated keys be default and the one you use for primary key column.

RE: [JBoss-dev] ClassCastException from ProxyCompiler$Proxy35.getId(generated)

2003-07-10 Thread MNewcomb
-Original Message- From: Newcomb, Michael P. So, what do we do about it? Should JDBCGetGeneratedKeysCreateCommand test for Number and convert to expected type? Or should we urge MySQL to create the type based upon the type of field it is? Actually,

[JBoss-dev] [AUTOMATED] JBoss (HEAD/winxp) Test Job Failed to Complete Successfully

2003-07-10 Thread Chris Kimpton
=== ==THIS IS AN AUTOMATED EMAIL - SEE http://jboss1.kimptoc.net/ FOR DETAILS== ===

[JBoss-dev] [AUTOMATED] JBoss (HEAD/winxp) Test Results: 96 % ( 786 / 817 ) - nearly there - who is gonna get us to 100%!

2003-07-10 Thread Chris Kimpton
=== ==THIS IS AN AUTOMATED EMAIL - SEE http://jboss1.kimptoc.net/ FOR DETAILS== ===

[JBoss-dev] [AUTOMATED] JBoss (HEAD/linux1) Test Job Failed to Complete Successfully

2003-07-10 Thread Chris Kimpton
=== ==THIS IS AN AUTOMATED EMAIL - SEE http://jboss1.kimptoc.net/ FOR DETAILS== ===

[JBoss-dev] [AUTOMATED] JBoss (HEAD/linux1) Test Results: 96 % ( 794 / 826 ) - nearly there - who is gonna get us to 100%!

2003-07-10 Thread Chris Kimpton
=== ==THIS IS AN AUTOMATED EMAIL - SEE http://jboss1.kimptoc.net/ FOR DETAILS== ===

[JBoss-dev] Automated JBoss(Branch_3_2 WonderLand) Testsuite Results: 10-July-2003

2003-07-10 Thread scott . stark
Automated JBoss(Branch_3_2 WonderLand) Testsuite Results: 10-July-2003 JBoss daily test results SUMMARY Number of tests run: 1369 Successful tests: 1353 Errors:10 Failures: 6

[JBoss-dev] Automated JBoss(Branch_3_2 WonderLand) Testsuite Results: 10-July-2003

2003-07-10 Thread scott . stark
Automated JBoss(Branch_3_2 WonderLand) Testsuite Results: 10-July-2003 JBoss daily test results SUMMARY Number of tests run: 1388 Successful tests: 1373 Errors:9 Failures: 6

[JBoss-dev] [AUTOMATED] JBoss (HEAD/linux1) Compilation failed

2003-07-10 Thread Chris Kimpton
=== ==THIS IS AN AUTOMATED EMAIL - SEE http://jboss1.kimptoc.net/ FOR DETAILS== ===

[JBoss-dev] [AUTOMATED] JBoss (HEAD/winxp) Compilation failed

2003-07-10 Thread Chris Kimpton
=== ==THIS IS AN AUTOMATED EMAIL - SEE http://jboss1.kimptoc.net/ FOR DETAILS== ===

[JBoss-dev] [ jboss-Bugs-769469 ] Failed to run JSF EA4 jsf-demo.war

2003-07-10 Thread SourceForge.net
Bugs item #769469, was opened at 2003-07-11 12:22 Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=769469group_id=22866 Category: JBossWeb Group: v3.2 Status: Open Resolution: None

[JBoss-dev] [ jboss-Bugs-769139 ] entityCtx.getEJBLocalObject() returns wrong instance

2003-07-10 Thread SourceForge.net
Bugs item #769139, was opened at 2003-07-10 07:03 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by starksm You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=769139group_id=22866 Category: JBossServer Group: v3.2 Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5

[JBoss-dev] ClassCastException from ProxyCompiler$Proxy35.getId(generated)

2003-07-10 Thread MNewcomb
jboss-head from ~ July 1. RedHat 8 JDK 1.4.1 Mysql I have a simple bean that has auto-generated Integer primary keys. MyLocal myLocal = myLocalHome.create(name, description); myLocal.getName(); -- works fine myLocal.getDescription(); -- works fine myLocal.getId(); -- Throws ClassCastException in