[JBoss-dev] [ jboss-Bugs-762045 ] Cannot get EJB Home interface from Remote interface

2003-08-07 Thread SourceForge.net
Bugs item #762045, was opened at 2003-06-27 12:12 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by dciarnie You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=762045group_id=22866 Category: JBossServer Group: v3.2 Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5

[JBoss-dev] [ jboss-Bugs-784584 ] Class-Path entry in war manifest ignored

2003-08-07 Thread SourceForge.net
Bugs item #784584, was opened at 2003-08-06 23:08 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by bstansberry You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=784584group_id=22866 Category: JBossWeb Group: v3.2 Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5

Re: [JBoss-dev] Problem with anonymous CVS checkout of Nukes

2003-08-07 Thread Joachim Van der Auwera
I don't think you are missing anything. Sourceforge have had problems with their anonymous CVS servers being overloaded for a while now. They have announced updates, and I too hope they will happen soon. Joachim - Original Message - From: Steffen Zschaler [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL

[JBoss-dev] [ jboss-Bugs-784870 ] FilePersistenceManager cannot be used

2003-08-07 Thread SourceForge.net
Bugs item #784870, was opened at 2003-08-07 09:36 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by starksm You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=784870group_id=22866 Category: JBossMQ Group: v3.2 Status: Closed Resolution: Invalid Priority: 5

RE: [JBoss-dev] RE: [JBoss-user] Re: Recent CVS removals

2003-08-07 Thread Matt Munz
Bill, Opinions on professionality aside, isn't forking a very expected activity in open source development? If someone can't take Open Source code and make a new (Open Source) product with it, then what is the difference between Open Source and (closed) Shared Source?[1] As long as a

[JBoss-dev] July 2003 news

2003-08-07 Thread marc fleury
Hello folks, As usual I will take the time to pitch you our new trainings and keep you update with the latest news about jboss. First let's take care of the business. TRAININGS x ATLANTA BOOTCAMP: Atlanta Boot Camp is fast approaching: Aug 16-17 in Atlanta at the Swissotel. This is a

[JBoss-dev] RE: [JBoss-user] Re: Recent CVS removals

2003-08-07 Thread Bill Burke
-Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Greg Wilkins Sent: Wednesday, August 06, 2003 8:37 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [JBoss-user] Re: Recent CVS removals Firstly a note to the list moderator: This is a

[JBoss-dev] [AUTOMATED] JBoss (HEAD/linux1) Test Results: 92 % ( 13 / 14 ) - come on - pull your finger out

2003-08-07 Thread Chris Kimpton
=== ==THIS IS AN AUTOMATED EMAIL - SEE http://jboss1.kimptoc.net/ FOR DETAILS== ===

[JBoss-dev] [ jboss-Bugs-763378 ] housekeeping in mbean server module

2003-08-07 Thread SourceForge.net
Bugs item #763378, was opened at 2003-06-30 20:36 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by juhalindfors You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=763378group_id=22866 Category: JBossMX Group: v4.0 Status: Pending Resolution: Accepted

[JBoss-dev] [ jboss-Bugs-784343 ] Invalid msgType Concurrency Bug?

2003-08-07 Thread SourceForge.net
Bugs item #784343, was opened at 2003-08-06 19:15 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by wolfftw You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=784343group_id=22866 Category: JBossMQ Group: v3.2 Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5

[JBoss-dev] Problem with anonymous CVS checkout of Nukes

2003-08-07 Thread Steffen Zschaler
Hi, I tried (several times already) to do a CVS CO of nukes as described in your docs. 98 out of a 100 trials I get to see nothing but: cvs [update aborted]: end of file from server (consult above messages if any) with no above messages to consult. The rest of the time I usually get: cvs

[JBoss-dev] Re: [JBoss-user] Recent CVS removals

2003-08-07 Thread Brian Wallis
On Thu, 7 Aug 2003 08:49, Bill Burke wrote: 2. More importantly, we have learned that they have forked JBoss. We also believe they are preparing to submit it, or some derivation, to the new Apache Geronimo project which would violate copyright and LGPL. Our proof?