[JBoss-dev] JBoss Test Results: 62 % ( 667 / 1069 ) - could do better. JBoss (HEAD/winxp/1.4.1_05) [AUTOMATED]

2003-11-20 Thread chris
=== ==THIS IS AN AUTOMATED EMAIL - SEE http://jboss.kimptoc.net/ FOR DETAILS== ===

[JBoss-dev] US STOCK MARKET - CYPM Acquisition - To Compete With DISNEY PIXAR...chaela

2003-11-20 Thread Connie Post
US Stock Market - Stock Profile of the Week Symbol: CYPM Market: OTCBB Sector: 3D Animation Get Quote: http://quote.money.cnn.com/quote/quote?symbols=cypm BREAKING NEWS - CYPM Acquires Profitable Joongang Movie Entertainment...CYPM To Compete With Pixar Disney NEW YORK---PRIMEZONE---Cyper

[JBoss-dev] [ jboss-Bugs-845637 ] findByPrimaryKey() finds uncommitted entity

2003-11-20 Thread SourceForge.net
Bugs item #845637, was opened at 2003-11-20 11:03 Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=845637group_id=22866 Category: JBossTX Group: v3.2 Status: Open Resolution: None

[JBoss-dev] JBoss Test Results: 82 % ( 1164 / 1406 ) - come on - pull your finger out. JBoss (HEAD/winxp/1.4.2_01) [AUTOMATED]

2003-11-20 Thread chris
=== ==THIS IS AN AUTOMATED EMAIL - SEE http://jboss.kimptoc.net/ FOR DETAILS== ===

[JBoss-dev] JNDI binding for J2EE1.4 compliant webservices

2003-11-20 Thread thomas . diesler
Hi all, there seems to be some confusion about how webservices are bound to JNDI. Here is my interpretation of the JSR109 spec. Maybe you whant to throw your 2 cents in. server programming model --- No mention of JNDI. The server makes the webservice available at a

[JBoss-dev] deployment classloader in AbstractWebContainer

2003-11-20 Thread thomas . diesler
Hi Scott, the AbstractWebContainer now accepts nested deployments (it looks for WEB-INF/webservices.xml). The nested deployment is then handled by the JSR109Service, which tries to load the service endpoint interface (SEI) from the parents class loader. During AbstractWebContainer.init the

[JBoss-dev] [ jboss-Feature Requests-845823 ] Send mail that requires pop authentication

2003-11-20 Thread SourceForge.net
Feature Requests item #845823, was opened at 2003-11-20 14:23 Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376688aid=845823group_id=22866 Category: JBossMail Group: v3.2 Status: Open

[JBoss-dev] Re: deployment classloader in AbstractWebContainer

2003-11-20 Thread Scott M Stark
The deployment localCl is only for finding resources, not classes. The classes class loader is created/assigned by the MainDeployer after init as this may be the class loader from an encompassing deployment (ear). Class loading should not be occurring until create. --

Re: [JBoss-dev] JNDI binding for J2EE1.4 compliant webservices

2003-11-20 Thread Scott M Stark
I agree with that, so what is the confusion? -- Scott Stark Chief Technology Officer JBoss Group, LLC [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi all, there seems to be some confusion about how webservices are bound to JNDI. Here is my interpretation of the

AW: [JBoss-dev] Re: deployment classloader in AbstractWebContaine r

2003-11-20 Thread Jung , Dr. Christoph
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht- Von: Scott M Stark [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Gesendet: Donnerstag, 20. November 2003 15:34 An: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Betreff: [JBoss-dev] Re: deployment classloader in AbstractWebContainer The deployment localCl is only for finding

Re: AW: [JBoss-dev] Re: deployment classloader in AbstractWebContaine r

2003-11-20 Thread Scott M Stark
Yes, the localCl is only for deployers to find their descriptors or deployment local configurations prior to the creation of, or assignment to the deployment ucl, which does not occur until after init. -- Scott Stark Chief Technology Officer JBoss Group, LLC

[JBoss-dev] [ jboss-Bugs-845157 ] ClassCastException with PortableRemoteObject.narrow using jb

2003-11-20 Thread SourceForge.net
Bugs item #845157, was opened at 2003-11-19 14:38 Message generated for change (Settings changed) made by kgilpin You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=845157group_id=22866 Category: JBossServer Group: v3.2 Status: Open Resolution: None Priority:

AW: [JBoss-dev] JNDI binding for J2EE1.4 compliant webservices

2003-11-20 Thread Jung , Dr. Christoph
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht- Von: Scott M Stark [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Gesendet: Donnerstag, 20. November 2003 16:07 An: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Betreff: Re: [JBoss-dev] JNDI binding for J2EE1.4 compliant webservices I agree with that, so what is the confusion? From my reading, I

Re: AW: [JBoss-dev] JNDI binding for J2EE1.4 compliant webservices

2003-11-20 Thread Scott M Stark
I don't see a problem with doing that, and in fact, if the behavior of the deployer is more consistent with existing, can reuse existing logic, etc. if this is the mode of operation then this is fine. Its really an implementation detail that the spec is not going to define. It would also probably

[JBoss-dev] [ jboss-Bugs-844654 ] HSQL datasource -- should issue SHUTDOWN

2003-11-20 Thread SourceForge.net
Bugs item #844654, was opened at 2003-11-18 21:06 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by pilhuhn You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=844654group_id=22866 Category: JBossMQ Group: v3.2 Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5

[JBoss-dev] [ jboss-Bugs-844654 ] HSQL datasource -- should issue SHUTDOWN

2003-11-20 Thread SourceForge.net
Bugs item #844654, was opened at 2003-11-18 12:06 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by genman You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=844654group_id=22866 Category: JBossMQ Group: v3.2 Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5

[JBoss-dev] Compilation Failed! JBoss (Branch_3_2/winxp/1.4.2_01) [AUTOMATED]

2003-11-20 Thread chris
=== ==THIS IS AN AUTOMATED EMAIL - SEE http://jboss.kimptoc.net/ FOR DETAILS== ===

[JBoss-dev] JBoss Test Results: 94 % ( 1398 / 1486 ) - come on - pull your finger out. JBoss (HEAD/linux1/1.4.1_05) [AUTOMATED]

2003-11-20 Thread chris
=== ==THIS IS AN AUTOMATED EMAIL - SEE http://jboss.kimptoc.net/ FOR DETAILS== ===

[JBoss-dev] FINANCIAL Independence Is Calling You...dion

2003-11-20 Thread Sylvia Mccormick
Got your attention? Follow me to your road of Financial Independence: http://www.wppv.org/p No more advertisements, thanks - http://www.aqmp.net/out5s/rem2e.asp blalzqptigmdcqidouajdenx dikjcwlhshnllnvjlto

[JBoss-dev] JBoss Test Results: 94 % ( 1398 / 1486 ) - come on - pull your finger out. JBoss (HEAD/linux1/1.4.2_01) [AUTOMATED]

2003-11-20 Thread chris
=== ==THIS IS AN AUTOMATED EMAIL - SEE http://jboss.kimptoc.net/ FOR DETAILS== ===