Title: IKI DEV TURK'UN AVRUPA HEYECANINI KATLAYIN
===
==THIS IS AN AUTOMATED EMAIL - SEE http://jboss.kimptoc.net/ FOR DETAILS==
===
===
==THIS IS AN AUTOMATED EMAIL - SEE http://jboss.kimptoc.net/ FOR DETAILS==
===
===
==THIS IS AN AUTOMATED EMAIL - SEE http://jboss.kimptoc.net/ FOR DETAILS==
===
Hi,
Ricardo Argüello:
Maybe we should give Maven a try then...
Ewww. Maven is at least as complex as the current buildmagic.
And the behaviour of first fetching Megabytes of stuff before
bringing the first error report is in my eyes not desirable
(yes, I know there is an offline mode).
On
Bugs item #846551, was opened at 2003-11-21 12:45
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by ejort
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=846551group_id=22866
Category: JBossCX
Group: v3.2
Status: Closed
Resolution: Out of Date
Priority:
Bugs item #845637, was opened at 2003-11-20 09:03
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by ejort
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=845637group_id=22866
Category: JBossServer
Group: v3.2
Status: Closed
Resolution: Invalid
Priority:
On Nov 26, 2003, at 3:57 AM, Bill Burke wrote:
Yes, but in EJB QL/JBOSS QL you can only select one item, so group by
is useless.
I forgot to add a unique primary key to the example below. Which is
what you typically select on.
Anyway, if you think GROUP BY is useless, how would I do the
Bugs item #849585, was opened at 2003-11-26 16:56
Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=849585group_id=22866
Category: JBossMQ
Group: v3.2
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Bugs item #849600, was opened at 2003-11-26 12:48
Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=849600group_id=22866
Category: JBossCMP
Group: v3.2
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Bugs item #849600, was opened at 2003-11-26 12:48
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by rafciom
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=849600group_id=22866
Category: JBossCMP
Group: v3.2
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Bugs item #849681, was opened at 2003-11-26 16:37
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by loubyansky
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=849681group_id=22866
Category: JBossCMP
Group: v3.2
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Bugs item #849681, was opened at 2003-11-26 15:37
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by aboud
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=849681group_id=22866
Category: JBossCMP
Group: v3.2
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Bugs item #849585, was opened at 2003-11-26 11:26
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by ejort
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=849585group_id=22866
Category: JBossMQ
Group: v3.2
Status: Closed
Resolution: Fixed
Priority: 5
Bugs item #849600, was opened at 2003-11-26 11:48
Message generated for change (Settings changed) made by ejort
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=849600group_id=22866
Category: JBossServer
Group: v3.2
Status: Open
Resolution: Accepted
Stefan Arentz wrote:
On Nov 26, 2003, at 3:57 AM, Bill Burke wrote:
Yes, but in EJB QL/JBOSS QL you can only select one item, so group by
is useless.
I forgot to add a unique primary key to the example below. Which is what
you typically select on.
Anyway, if you think GROUP BY is
This is incorrect.
SELECT OBJECT(o) FROM MyBean AS o
For example.
Bill Burke wrote:
Seems to me, that with EJB QL, you can only select a particular Entity,
or a field of a particular entity. So, you cannot select *all*.
---
This SF.net email
On Wed, 2003-11-26 at 02:30, Stefan Arentz wrote:
Anyway, if you think GROUP BY is useless, how would I do the query
that I posted earlier? Select *all* records and then filter in my
session facade? That would be pretty lame as it is really a DB job.
You can probably create a view to do
does it only work under JDK 1.2.2 ?
I've tried to run it off the latest snapshot and get tge following
stacktrace :
ClientAbortException: java.net.SocketException: Connection reset by
peer: socket write error
at
On Nov 26, 2003, at 5:13 PM, Bill Burke wrote:
...
Hopefully our future integration of CMP on top of Hibernate will
provide this sort of solution. But, if you want to do this work, we
would be really happy to have it!
I just put it in JBoss 3.2.2. Where do I submit a diff?
S.
Excuse me, what have you put in 3.2? Bill wrote about CMP on top of
Hibernate.
You can submit a patch on sourceforge.net.
Stefan Arentz wrote:
On Nov 26, 2003, at 5:13 PM, Bill Burke wrote:
...
Hopefully our future integration of CMP on top of Hibernate will
provide this sort of solution.
On Nov 26, 2003, at 6:26 PM, Alexey Loubyansky wrote:
Excuse me, what have you put in 3.2? Bill wrote about CMP on top of
Hibernate.
You can submit a patch on sourceforge.net.
Oh. I have a patch that adds GROUP BY to jbossql. It follows the
notation on:
Bugs item #849786, was opened at 2003-11-26 18:10
Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=849786group_id=22866
Category: JBossServer
Group: v3.2
Status: Open
Resolution:
I get the same problem and the right-button popup never shows up. There
seems to be a platform-dependent issue on this.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Werner Ramaekers
Sent: mercredi, 26. novembre 2003 18:10
To: [EMAIL
Bugs item #849786, was opened at 2003-11-26 18:10
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by cazzius
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=849786group_id=22866
Category: JBossServer
Group: v3.2
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
===
==THIS IS AN AUTOMATED EMAIL - SEE http://jboss.kimptoc.net/ FOR DETAILS==
===
===
==THIS IS AN AUTOMATED EMAIL - SEE http://jboss.kimptoc.net/ FOR DETAILS==
===
===
==THIS IS AN AUTOMATED EMAIL - SEE http://jboss.kimptoc.net/ FOR DETAILS==
===
===
==THIS IS AN AUTOMATED EMAIL - SEE http://jboss.kimptoc.net/ FOR DETAILS==
===
===
==THIS IS AN AUTOMATED EMAIL - SEE http://jboss.kimptoc.net/ FOR DETAILS==
===
===
==THIS IS AN AUTOMATED EMAIL - SEE http://jboss.kimptoc.net/ FOR DETAILS==
===
===
==THIS IS AN AUTOMATED EMAIL - SEE http://jboss.kimptoc.net/ FOR DETAILS==
===
===
==THIS IS AN AUTOMATED EMAIL - SEE http://jboss.kimptoc.net/ FOR DETAILS==
===
Bugs item #850013, was opened at 2003-11-27 13:08
Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=850013group_id=22866
Category: JBossCMP
Group: v3.2
Status: Open
Resolution: None
34 matches
Mail list logo
