I need a thread pool and upon checking, noticed that we have several
implementations through out. However none were in common (and two of
them look exactly the same). Any one in particular that should be
considered the standard thread pool? If so, any reason it is not in
common?
Thanks.
Scott M Stark wrote:
Its included in the release in the same manner as 3.2.3RC1, as a sar with
a build file that creates a server/tomcat5 configuration that replaces the
tomcat-4.1.x sar with the tc5 version. The tc5 version cannot be made the
default until it at least passes the
Bugs item #848106, was opened at 2003-11-24 07:55
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by stephane_nicoll
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=848106group_id=22866
Category: JBossSOAP
Group: v3.2
Status: Open
Resolution: Works For
Bugs item #852016, was opened at 2003-12-01 11:42
Message generated for change (Settings changed) made by tdiesler
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=852016group_id=22866
Category: JBossSOAP
Group: v4.0
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority:
Bugs item #852016, was opened at 2003-12-01 11:42
Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=852016group_id=22866
Category: JBossSOAP
Group: v4.0
Status: Open
Resolution:
bagging chariot lantern merritt bowel delirious gargle lethargic mohr dryden shift lethargic barnabas end dribble actinium lesotho person notify hover metronome memoranda reuben spurt roundup suppressible
Banned CD Government don't want me to sell it. See Now +
vacillate chaperone philology
I thought we were using the doug lea's concurrent ThreadPool
(PooledExecutor) in most places?
- Original Message -
From: Tom Elrod [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, December 01, 2003 2:04 AM
Subject: [JBoss-dev] several ThreadPool classes
I need a thread pool and
Bugs item #850859, was opened at 2003-11-28 21:34
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by loubyansky
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=850859group_id=22866
Category: JBossCMP
Group: v3.2
Status: Closed
Resolution: Invalid
Feature Requests item #852106, was opened at 2003-12-01 15:46
Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376688aid=852106group_id=22866
Category: JBossCMP
Group: v3.2
Status: Open
Looks like PooledExecutor only being used in 3 or 4 places (in jms, mq,
and remoting), but think is best solution for me.
Jeff Haynie wrote:
I thought we were using the doug lea's concurrent ThreadPool
(PooledExecutor) in most places?
- Original Message -
From: Tom Elrod [EMAIL
10 matches
Mail list logo
