[JBoss-dev] [JMX on JBoss (JBoss/JMX)] - Re: Unification of invocation and interceptors

View the original post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3820630#3820630 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3820630 invokeNext(newInterceptors) I think is much too restrictive in its current form. Why not just have acc

[JBoss-dev] [JMX on JBoss (JBoss/JMX)] - Re: Unification of invocation and interceptors

View the original post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3820629#3820629 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3820629 nevermind, InvocationResponse is already a field inside Invocation, ignore

[JBoss-dev] [JMX on JBoss (JBoss/JMX)] - Re: Unification of invocation and interceptors

View the original post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3820628#3820628 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3820628 Do we need a separate InvocationResponse? All of those fields could be just as easily be included insi

[JBoss-dev] [Nukes Development] - Re: Architecture updated, important

View the original post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3820621#3820621 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3820621 Julien, I have a few quesitons about your changes: 1. Are these changes that you have checked in to

[JBoss-dev] JBoss Test Results: 82 % ( 982 / 1197 ) - come on - pull your finger out. JBoss (HEAD/linux1/1.4.1_06) [AUTOMATED]

=== ==THIS IS AN AUTOMATED EMAIL - SEE http://jboss.kimptoc.net/ FOR DETAILS== ===

[JBoss-dev] JBoss Shutdown Failed! JBoss (HEAD/linux1/1.4.1_06) [AUTOMATED]

=== ==THIS IS AN AUTOMATED EMAIL - SEE http://jboss.kimptoc.net/ FOR DETAILS== ===

[JBoss-dev] Test Job Failed to Complete Successfully (or we gave up on it...)! JBoss (HEAD/linux1/1.4.1_06) [AUTOMATED]

=== ==THIS IS AN AUTOMATED EMAIL - SEE http://jboss.kimptoc.net/ FOR DETAILS== ===

[JBoss-dev] [JMX on JBoss (JBoss/JMX)] - Re: Starting mbeans as a different user

View the original post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3820617#3820617 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3820617 This does not fit the current Java model and I'm not interested in doing OS specific integration to pr

[JBoss-dev] JBoss Shutdown Failed! JBoss (HEAD/winxp/1.4.1_06) [AUTOMATED]

=== ==THIS IS AN AUTOMATED EMAIL - SEE http://jboss.kimptoc.net/ FOR DETAILS== ===

[JBoss-dev] [JMX on JBoss (JBoss/JMX)] - Development Posts Only

View the original post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3820616#3820616 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3820616 This forum is for JMX development issues. Any other questions will be moved to the user JMX forum. -

[JBoss-dev] Test Job Failed to Complete Successfully (or we gave up on it...)! JBoss (HEAD/winxp/1.4.1_06) [AUTOMATED]

=== ==THIS IS AN AUTOMATED EMAIL - SEE http://jboss.kimptoc.net/ FOR DETAILS== ===

[JBoss-dev] [ jboss-Bugs-887832 ] finder does not find existing data

Bugs item #887832, was opened at 2004-01-30 22:56 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by loubyansky You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=376685&aid=887832&group_id=22866 Category: JBossCMP Group: v3.2 Status: Open Resolution: None Priority:

[JBoss-dev] [JMX on JBoss (JBoss/JMX)] - Unification of invocation and interceptors

View the original post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3820613#3820613 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3820613 As a start to the discussion of how to unify the invocation and interceptor layers used in the aop, jm

[JBoss-dev] [ jboss-Bugs-887832 ] finder does not find existing data

Bugs item #887832, was opened at 2004-01-30 21:56 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by lafr You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=376685&aid=887832&group_id=22866 Category: JBossCMP Group: v3.2 Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Subm

[JBoss-dev] [JBoss IDE] - Re: No ejb .class generation after running Xdoclet

View the original post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3820602#3820602 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3820602 I had this when I started as well. Make sure that the jar command is EXACTLY like what is in the docu

[JBoss-dev] [JBoss IDE] - No ejb .class generation after running Xdoclet

View the original post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3820582#3820582 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3820582 Hi everybody, I'm trying to lear Jboss-ide usage, it's a great tool! I have encountered a problem

[JBoss-dev] [Security on JBoss] - Re: JBoss 3.2.x security hole

View the original post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3820566#3820566 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3820566 Either set DownloadServerClasses to only allow downloading of EJB classes: false or remove the se

[JBoss-dev] [XDoclet on JBoss (XDoclet/JBoss)] - EJB Local objects with XDoclets

View the original post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3820567#3820567 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3820567 Tutorial on Developing one-to-one relationship by using EJB Local Objects with XDoclets -