Bugs item #853979, was opened at 2003-12-04 12:43
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by letiemble
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=853979group_id=22866
Category: JBoss-IDE
Group: v3.2
Status: Closed
Resolution: Remind
Bugs item #912018, was opened at 2004-03-08 16:01
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by letiemble
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=912018group_id=22866
Category: JBoss-IDE
Group: None
Status: Closed
Resolution: Postponed
Bugs item #917633, was opened at 2004-03-16 22:53
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by letiemble
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=917633group_id=22866
Category: JBoss-IDE
Group: None
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Bugs item #898239, was opened at 2004-02-16 20:47
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by letiemble
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=898239group_id=22866
Category: JBoss-IDE
Group: None
Status: Closed
Resolution: Duplicate
Bugs item #898210, was opened at 2004-02-16 19:59
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by letiemble
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=898210group_id=22866
Category: JBoss-IDE
Group: None
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Bugs item #917633, was opened at 2004-03-16 23:53
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by andrei_fsd
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=917633group_id=22866
Category: JBoss-IDE
Group: None
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Bugs item #917633, was opened at 2004-03-16 22:53
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by letiemble
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=917633group_id=22866
Category: JBoss-IDE
Group: None
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Bugs item #889117, was opened at 2004-02-02 16:00
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by letiemble
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=889117group_id=22866
Category: JBoss-IDE
Group: v3.2
Status: Closed
Resolution: Fixed
Priority:
Bugs item #898690, was opened at 2004-02-17 13:29
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by rafciom
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=898690group_id=22866
Category: JBossCMP
Group: None
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Bugs item #917633, was opened at 2004-03-16 23:53
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by andrei_fsd
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=917633group_id=22866
Category: JBoss-IDE
Group: None
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Bugs item #917633, was opened at 2004-03-16 22:53
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by letiemble
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=917633group_id=22866
Category: JBoss-IDE
Group: None
Status: Closed
Resolution: None
Priority:
Bugs item #913634, was opened at 2004-03-10 17:32
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by ejort
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=913634group_id=22866
Category: JBossMQ
Group: v3.2
Status: Closed
Resolution: Fixed
Priority: 5
On Wed, 2004-03-17 at 10:37, Dimitris Andreadis wrote:
How about having a sub-directory farm/singleton instead?
They serve different orthogonal purposes.
farm - is for applications deployed across a cluster
deploy-hasingleton - is for applications that should only be run on
one server at a
couldn't the deployer just pick up a tag from the descriptor -- rather
than add yet another deployment directory?
On Thu, 18 Mar 2004, Adrian Brock wrote:
On Wed, 2004-03-17 at 10:37, Dimitris Andreadis wrote:
How about having a sub-directory farm/singleton instead?
They serve different
I'm not sure if orthogonal is the right word for this case. If I rephrase:
farm - for applications deployed across a cluster
deploy-hasingleton - for applications deployed across a cluster but active only on one
node at a time.
It seems to me more like an an attribute of a clustered
On Thu, 2004-03-18 at 14:59, Juha-P Lindfors wrote:
couldn't the deployer just pick up a tag from the descriptor -- rather
than add yet another deployment directory?
Yes, that should be the long term solution. e.g.
singleton partition=DefaultDomain/ or
farm partition=MyWebServers/
But it *is*
On Thu, 2004-03-18 at 14:59, Juha-P Lindfors wrote:
couldn't the deployer just pick up a tag from the descriptor -- rather
than add yet another deployment directory?
Yes, that should be the long term solution. e.g.
singleton partition=DefaultDomain/ or
farm partition=MyWebServers/
But it *is*
On Thu, 2004-03-18 at 15:22, Dimitris Andreadis wrote:
I'm not sure if orthogonal is the right word for this case. If I rephrase:
farm - for applications deployed across a cluster
deploy-hasingleton - for applications deployed across a cluster but active only on
one node at a time.
It
===
==THIS IS AN AUTOMATED EMAIL - SEE http://jboss.kimptoc.net/ FOR DETAILS==
===
===
==THIS IS AN AUTOMATED EMAIL - SEE http://jboss.kimptoc.net/ FOR DETAILS==
===
acoliver wrote:
Thanks Sergey, I think you're dead on with the specific issues with mail storage. I disagree with the YAMS sentiment, in that each mail server have issues and I've not yet found one that I like. Granted I'm sure some folks will eventually investigate us and not like what we're
it is $nukes/build/local.properties
a
href=http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bbop=viewtopicp=3826424#3826424;View
the original post/a
a
href=http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bbop=postingmode=replyp=3826424Reply
to the post/a
I have checked in improvements for both index module and forum module.
The forum index is more efficient and the results are sorted when they are retrieved.
Also the query langage is the one given with lucene.
When message were added/removed/updated the index was not updated, now it is fixed.
On Fri, 2004-03-19 at 01:43, Bela Ban wrote:
Hey Adrian,
what are you doing ? You're breaking our code by changing start() to
startService() !
No I am not. All the cache tests still work for me.
start() invokes startService().
start() was never intended to be overriden, in fact doing so
in
===
==THIS IS AN AUTOMATED EMAIL - SEE http://jboss.kimptoc.net/ FOR DETAILS==
===
===
==THIS IS AN AUTOMATED EMAIL - SEE http://jboss.kimptoc.net/ FOR DETAILS==
===
26 matches
Mail list logo
