jae77 wrote : i've checked in the latest changes that should resolve the postgres
compatiblity issues.
| ...
| let me know if you have any problems.
I updated via CVS and it works great on my postgreSQL database. Thanks for your hard
work on this one. I was beginning to wonder if CMP was
I am running Tomcat as a service of JBoss 3.0.7, and I want to
deploy a web application.
By default, my web application is deployed since I placed a directory
named my_app.war under jboss/server/default/deploy.
It works.
I want to add a Context in tomcat/conf/server.xml, but it doesn't works.
Why?
Excuse me...
I add the context in:
jboss/server/default/deploy/tomcat41-service.xml
F.
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bbop=viewtopicp=3835643#3835643
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bbop=postingmode=replyp=3835643
Cool stuff,
what are pluggable pointcuts?
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bbop=viewtopicp=3835656#3835656
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bbop=postingmode=replyp=3835656
---
This
My stuff looks OK, but will check more thoroughly!
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bbop=viewtopicp=3835655#3835655
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bbop=postingmode=replyp=3835655
I didn't document them because I couldn't think of a usecase. Basically the way it
works is that you can define a class that does the pointcut magic. The class must
implement the org.jboss.aop.pointcut.Pointcut interface and you plug it in with:
| pluggable-pointcut name=foobar
in the works of mr. burns excellent! :)
there's a little bit of a headache here, but nothing that can't be overcome, esp now
that i know how to resolve the issue.
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bbop=viewtopicp=3835676#3835676
Reply to the post :
View results here -> http://tck2.jboss.com/cc/buildresults/jboss-head?log=log20040520111435Lbuild.177
BUILD COMPLETE-build.177Date of build:05/20/2004 11:14:35Time to build:18 minutes 41 secondsLast changed:05/20/2004 10:49:22Last log entry:Port the new receivers
Invoking a JSP like http://localhost:8080/jboss-net/happyaxis.jsp or
http://localhost:8080/jboss-net/happyjuddi.jsp I get the error message
that JASPER does not find the javac compiler.
Using version 4.0.0DR3 everything works fine.
View the original post :
View results here -> http://tck2.jboss.com/cc/buildresults/jboss-3.2?log=log20040520122057Lbuild.39
BUILD COMPLETE-build.39Date of build:05/20/2004 12:20:57Time to build:10 minutes 17 secondsLast changed:05/20/2004 10:28:46Last log entry:Remove a stray ; in the code that
Hello,
I am an experienced software developer who normally uses WSAD 5.0.1 at work.
I recently installed Eclipse 2.1.3 with the most recent JBoss IDE plugin. I
downloaded the QuickStart guide and also completed the JBoss IDE tutorial, so I am
familiar with how XDoclet is used to create the
Bill,
But these entityEJB setter/getter methods are abstract methods and are not
AOPized now. Is there any other Interceptor which can intercept any setter/getter
methods of entity EJB?
Thanks,
Ben C.
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.org/wiki/Diff.jsp?page=MailServicesBuildingr1=-1
Have you tested 1.6? Last I tried it failed. Never bothered to see why.
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bbop=viewtopicp=3835704#3835704
Reply to the post :
1.6.1 works. 1.6.0 gives some weird error, which I didn't bother to investigate either.
Ant 1.5.4 is needed to use the cmpversion attribute to the ejbjar task. Unless
cmpversion=2.0 is added to ejbjar task in build.xml, the jbosscmp-jdbc.xml file does
not seem to get added to the ejb.jar
Should read:
Ant 1.5.4 is needed to use the cmpversion attribute in the ejbjar task.
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bbop=viewtopicp=3835707#3835707
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bbop=postingmode=replyp=3835707
Again, look in:
jboss-X.X/server/default/conf/standardjboss.xml
Search for interceptor
Server side interpceptors for Entity beans have been available since JBoss 2.0.
Our forpay doco should also have examples of implementing an interceptor. (I know
there is at least a lab in our advanced
If it works I dun mind using it.
Shit, you're working on entity mail list? I'm about 1/2 way through... When will you
have it in? I promised tomorrow so..
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bbop=viewtopicp=3835719#3835719
Reply to the post :
View results here -> http://tck2.jboss.com/cc/buildresults/jboss-head?log=log20040520153832
BUILD FAILEDAnt Error Message:file:/home/build/cruisecontrol/work/scripts/build-jboss-head.xml:80: exec returned: 1Date of build:05/20/2004 15:38:32Time to build:21 minutes 14 secondsLast
Just testing and tidying up now, so tomorrow morning :-) Unless something majorly
wrong happens...
Can't figure out the unit tests for EJB stuff, but have added a test method in the
MBean interface to prove that it all works.
View the original post :
Okay cool. I'll bug ya then :-)
This is going to be awesome. If this goes well we'll have a hell of a test.
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bbop=viewtopicp=3835721#3835721
Reply to the post :
Enums will also be converted to JDk 1.4 using a common, well known pattern for
defining Enums.
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bbop=viewtopicp=3835730#3835730
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bbop=postingmode=replyp=3835730
OK, I got the entity maillist stuff commited now. The tests (via JMX-console) work
fine. Just as the memory version, it works as an isolated MBean, but will need
integrating with the rest of the system.
What do you think we need to do to test it with Nukes?
Cheers,
Kab
View the original
After reading the EJB3.0 specification it has become clear to me that Annotations are
a perfect abstraction for our configuration meta model. Therefore all new container
configurations will be defined in Annotations.
There are a lot of advantages with this approach:
1) It is very easy to
Is there a way to use delimiter instead of for the fields in access log?
I am using Jboss 3.2.3 with Tomcat 4.1.29.
Access log config for Tomcat is located at
JBOSS_HOME/server/default/deploy/jbossweb-tomcat41.sar/META-INF/jboss-service.xml
Tried to use \u0009 and ^I in the access logs
Bugs item #957737, was opened at 2004-05-20 16:16
Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=957737group_id=22866
Category: JBossMX
Group: v3.2
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Actually the first test is not nukes integration just the JBoss newsletter. So all we
need is to be able to send mail to a list that doesn't allow replies.
I need to look at nukes in more detail to give an intelligent answer on what
challenges nukes integration will bring. Tomorrow I'll be
Can everyone maybe fill this out:
http://www.jboss.org/wiki/Wiki.jsp?page=MailServicesMilestone2Progress
I won't hold you to it, but I just want to avoid everyone working on the same thing.
Its also a great way to attract other contributers (showing what is happening and
where).
I appriciate
===
==THIS IS AN AUTOMATED EMAIL - SEE http://jboss.kimptoc.net/ FOR DETAILS==
===
Patches item #957781, was opened at 2004-05-20 21:41
Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376687aid=957781group_id=22866
Category: JBoss-IDE
Group: None
Status: Open
Resolution:
===
==THIS IS AN AUTOMATED EMAIL - SEE http://jboss.kimptoc.net/ FOR DETAILS==
===
===
==THIS IS AN AUTOMATED EMAIL - SEE http://jboss.kimptoc.net/ FOR DETAILS==
===
Got some help from Apache's Tomcat user group.
Used #9; as the delimiter for TAB. It works!
#9; is the numerical entity reference for \u0009;
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bbop=viewtopicp=3835760#3835760
Reply to the post :
Bugs item #957827, was opened at 2004-05-21 05:34
Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=957827group_id=22866
Category: JBossWeb
Group: v4.0
Status: Open
Resolution: None
33 matches
Mail list logo
