===
==THIS IS AN AUTOMATED EMAIL - SEE http://jboss.kimptoc.net/ FOR DETAILS==
===
===
==THIS IS AN AUTOMATED EMAIL - SEE http://jboss.kimptoc.net/ FOR DETAILS==
===
===
==THIS IS AN AUTOMATED EMAIL - SEE http://jboss.kimptoc.net/ FOR DETAILS==
===
Hello!
To my situation:
I have a JBoss server and a repl_sync TreeCache service. Now I want some client apps
get information about changes to the TreeCache. I've performed this with JMS and
Facade beans. But isn't there a possibility to connect the client directly with the
TreeCache?
Thanx
Bugs item #992215, was opened at 2004-07-16 12:43
Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=992215group_id=22866
Category: JBossServer
Group: v3.2
Status: Open
Resolution:
===
==THIS IS AN AUTOMATED EMAIL - SEE http://jboss.kimptoc.net/ FOR DETAILS==
===
===
==THIS IS AN AUTOMATED EMAIL - SEE http://jboss.kimptoc.net/ FOR DETAILS==
===
bela wrote :
| Suggestion: why don't you override startService() in your subclass ?
|
Thanks for your input and i actually would if i could - but since createCacheLoader(),
fetchStateOnStartup(), determineCoordinator() and createInterceptorChain() are not
declared public and are
===
==THIS IS AN AUTOMATED EMAIL - SEE http://jboss.kimptoc.net/ FOR DETAILS==
===
===
==THIS IS AN AUTOMATED EMAIL - SEE http://jboss.kimptoc.net/ FOR DETAILS==
===
I have discovered this problem recently. If you have a scoped application (jar, ear,
or war), that implies different context class loaders. In this case, you will need to
use the jboss utility class wrapper org.jboss.invocation.MarshalledValue to wrap your
serializable object first before
Just let you know that we have solved Chuck's problem. Looks like it is different from
the one that Rich has.
I have created a sf bug #992297. Herfe is description:
Currently when transaction isolation level is set to
REPEATABLE, it uses read write lock with upgrade.
However, when there are
Made those methods protected, so go and override startService()
Bela
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bbop=viewtopicp=3842382#3842382
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bbop=postingmode=replyp=3842382
This should work for now. However, I'm going to add the mechanism used by
MarshalledValue to JGroups itself, so this isn't needed. This will probably be in
JBoss 3.2.6, I'm going to upgrade JGroups used by JBoss soon.
Bela
View the original post :
Hi,
Since TreeCache is a MBean service it can be accessed via RMIAdaptor for example.
HTH
Sebi
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bbop=viewtopicp=3842385#3842385
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bbop=postingmode=replyp=3842385
Thanks a lot again :)
I can now finally confirm that the TX-lookups work under WebSphere 5.1 !
(And you can't imagine how i hate WebSphere by now )
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bbop=viewtopicp=3842401#3842401
Reply to the post :
I hope this is not a completely trivial or dumb question,
but here it comes ;-)
I am using the jbossservice task from the hibernate doclet
for generating the jboss-service.xml descriptor. works great.
In there I have to specify various things such as JNDI name,
user/password or hibernate
in fact, I've created a HTML block and I don't want Anonymous to see it. I don't
know how permissions work... Could you tell me how I can make it? What pattern need I
use? Thanks a lot.
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bbop=viewtopicp=3842408#3842408
Reply to
sorry for the late response. With current CVS head I was able to write a unit test
that had these pointcuts you described above with no problems. Maybe I have fixed
something since Jun, I don't know.
|
| bind pointcut=execution(public * $instanceof{javax.ejb.SessionBean}-*(..))
Merci ninus2, ca y est ca marche ;)
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bbop=viewtopicp=3842413#3842413
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bbop=postingmode=replyp=3842413
---
This SF.Net
===
==THIS IS AN AUTOMATED EMAIL - SEE http://jboss.kimptoc.net/ FOR DETAILS==
===
===
==THIS IS AN AUTOMATED EMAIL - SEE http://jboss.kimptoc.net/ FOR DETAILS==
===
Bugs item #992215, was opened at 2004-07-16 09:43
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by ejort
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=992215group_id=22866
Category: JBossServer
Group: v3.2
Status: Closed
Resolution: Out of Date
Bugs item #992441, was opened at 2004-07-16 16:50
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by ejort
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=992441group_id=22866
Category: JBossServer
Group: None
Status: Closed
Resolution: Fixed
Priority: 5
===
==THIS IS AN AUTOMATED EMAIL - SEE http://jboss.kimptoc.net/ FOR DETAILS==
===
===
==THIS IS AN AUTOMATED EMAIL - SEE http://jboss.kimptoc.net/ FOR DETAILS==
===
just wondering if any of you have experience of using JBossMailServices to process
sending out mass email(mailing list)? We also would like to add features for scheduled
email delivery and should have low system resource consuming.
Not sure if anyone can give any suggestions? any sample code
View results here -> http://tck2.jboss.com/cc/buildresults/jboss-3.2?log=log20040716164357Lbuild.149
BUILD COMPLETE-build.149Date of build:07/16/2004 16:43:57Time to build:11 minutes 15 secondsLast changed:07/16/2004 14:28:47Last log entry:log an error if the Hibernate service
I am very sorry, I copied this post from JBoss - JBoss User - JBoss.NET SOAP,
because I did not know if this is a bug (maybe?) !!
And, sorry for my english.
It is possible that .wsr archive do not redeploy without a jboss restart, or did I
made something wrong ?
I am on WindowsXP
With
Bugs item #992651, was opened at 2004-07-16 17:28
Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=992651group_id=22866
Category: JBossCache
Group: v2.3 (unstable)
Status: Open
Bugs item #992657, was opened at 2004-07-16 17:44
Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=992657group_id=22866
Category: JBossCache
Group: v3.2
Status: Open
Resolution:
31 matches
Mail list logo
