[JBoss-dev] [ jboss-Bugs-1061111 ] Verifier warning message not found

Bugs item #106, was opened at 2004-11-05 10:08 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by starksm You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=376685&aid=106&group_id=22866 Category: JBossServer Group: v4.0 >Status: Closed Resolution: None Prior

[JBoss-dev] [ jboss-Bugs-1078485 ] Farm hot deploy of exploded archive fails

Bugs item #1078485, was opened at 2004-12-03 09:51 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by starksm You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=376685&aid=1078485&group_id=22866 Category: Clustering Group: v4.0 >Status: Closed Resolution: Postponed P

[JBoss-dev] [ jboss-Bugs-1080095 ] ejb-link fails with linked tmp directory

Bugs item #1080095, was opened at 2004-12-06 10:03 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by starksm You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=376685&aid=1080095&group_id=22866 Category: JBossServer Group: v4.0 >Status: Closed Resolution: None Prior

[JBoss-dev] [ jboss-Bugs-1085726 ] Incorrect Handle implementation for CMP Entity beans

Bugs item #1085726, was opened at 2004-12-15 03:25 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by starksm You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=376685&aid=1085726&group_id=22866 Category: JBossServer Group: v4.0 >Status: Closed Resolution: None Prior

[JBoss-dev] [ jboss-Bugs-1089791 ] WSDLFilePublisher doesn't support remote XML schemas

Bugs item #1089791, was opened at 2004-12-22 07:24 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by starksm You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=376685&aid=1089791&group_id=22866 Category: JBossWS Group: v4.0 >Status: Closed Resolution: None Priority:

[JBoss-dev] [ jboss-Bugs-1088495 ] Session replication fails on 2-node cluster

Bugs item #1088495, was opened at 2004-12-20 08:21 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by starksm You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=376685&aid=1088495&group_id=22866 Category: Clustering Group: v4.0 >Status: Closed Resolution: None Priori

[JBoss-dev] [ jboss-Bugs-1089786 ] Missing org.w3c.dom.xpath.* in JBoss

Bugs item #1089786, was opened at 2004-12-22 07:15 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by starksm You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=376685&aid=1089786&group_id=22866 Category: JBossServer Group: v4.0 >Status: Closed Resolution: None Prior

[JBoss-dev] [JBoss JIRA] Commented: (JBAS-1255) memory leak after 7 hours

[ http://jira.jboss.com/jira/browse/JBAS-1255?page=comments#action_12314446 ] Scott M Stark commented on JBAS-1255: - Date: 2004-12-29 10:45 Sender: atomrom Logged In: YES user_id=1184354 Some new details: I simplified the application to the follow

[JBoss-dev] [ jboss-Bugs-1090921 ] memory leak after 7 hours

Bugs item #1090921, was opened at 2004-12-24 11:18 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by starksm You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=376685&aid=1090921&group_id=22866 Category: JBossCMP Group: v4.0 >Status: Closed >Resolution: Duplicate Pr

[JBoss-dev] jboss-head build.638 Build Successful

View results here -> http://cruisecontrol.jboss.com/cc/buildresults/jboss-head?log=log20041229141732Lbuild.638 BUILD COMPLETE - build.638Date of build: 12/29/2004 14:17:32Time to build: 18 minutes 45 secondsLast changed: 12/29/2004 11:58:28Last log entry: The 1.0-dev release of

[JBoss-dev] [ jboss-Bugs-1090921 ] memory leak after 7 hours

Bugs item #1090921, was opened at 2004-12-24 20:18 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by atomrom You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=376685&aid=1090921&group_id=22866 Category: JBossCMP Group: v4.0 Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5

[JBoss-dev] [Design of JBoss Build System] - Re: Revising the project structure

I will include a section on project structure in the development process guide. I will post a pointer to that section here once we publish later today. View the original post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3860119#3860119 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.org/in

[JBoss-dev] [JBoss JIRA] Created: (JBAS-1258) Remove jbossha-httpsession.sar

Remove jbossha-httpsession.sar -- Key: JBAS-1258 URL: http://jira.jboss.com/jira/browse/JBAS-1258 Project: JBoss Application Server Type: Task Components: Clustering Versions: JBossAS-4.0.1 Final Reporter: Ben Wang Assigne

[JBoss-dev] [JBoss JIRA] Created: (JBAS-1257) Set default http session replication mode to asychonous

Set default http session replication mode to asychonous --- Key: JBAS-1257 URL: http://jira.jboss.com/jira/browse/JBAS-1257 Project: JBoss Application Server Type: Task Components: Clustering Versions: JBoss

[JBoss-dev] jboss-head-jdk-matrix build.44 Build Successful

View results here -> http://cruisecontrol.jboss.com/cc/buildresults/jboss-head-jdk-matrix?log=log20041229111501Lbuild.44 BUILD COMPLETE - build.44Date of build: 12/29/2004 11:15:01Time to build: 27 minutes 13 secondsLast changed: 12/29/2004 07:37:55Last log entry: Feed the Find

[JBoss-dev] [TODO -- DEVELOPMENT] - Re: Naming services not initialized

ranganvv, This was a joke, 2.2.1 is very old. you probably played with your jndi.properties file (either modified it or added another one on the classpath). cheers, sacha View the original post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3860114#3860114 Reply to the post :

[JBoss-dev] [JBossWS] - Re: wrapped document/literal

"ebu" wrote : | Did i understood correctly that JBoss supports only pure document/literal (not wrapped) with single parameter per method only? | Yes wrapped is not supported "ebu" wrote : | And it is impossible to make it work with messages with several parameters in docl/literal mode

[JBoss-dev] jboss-4.0-jdk-matrix build.48 Build Successful

View results here -> http://cruisecontrol.jboss.com/cc/buildresults/jboss-4.0-jdk-matrix?log=log20041229102030Lbuild.48 BUILD COMPLETE - build.48Date of build: 12/29/2004 10:20:30Time to build: 26 minutes 4 secondsLast changed: 12/28/2004 16:09:04Last log entry: Feed the Create

[JBoss-dev] jboss-head build.637 Build Successful

View results here -> http://cruisecontrol.jboss.com/cc/buildresults/jboss-head?log=log20041229091710Lbuild.637 BUILD COMPLETE - build.637Date of build: 12/29/2004 09:17:10Time to build: 41 minutes 9 secondsLast changed: 12/29/2004 07:37:55Last log entry: Feed the FinderExceptio

[JBoss-dev] jboss-3.2-testsuite build.34 Build Successful

View results here -> http://cruisecontrol.jboss.com/cc/buildresults/jboss-3.2-testsuite?log=log20041229073009Lbuild.34 BUILD COMPLETE - build.34Date of build: 12/29/2004 07:30:09Time to build: 69 minutes 16 seconds  Unit Tests: (1886)  T

[JBoss-dev] [TODO -- DEVELOPMENT] - Re: Naming services not initialized

Hi Sacha Thanks for your reply. The application is running on JBOSS 2.2.1. I need to get this application run on this version of JBOSS only. Any suggestions to fix this problem in the current version itself. I will also downgrade the version and try as you said. Thanks again. View the origin

[JBoss-dev] [TODO -- DEVELOPMENT] - Re: Naming services not initialized

Have you tried to downgrade to JBoss 2.0.1 to see if the problem was still present? Cheers, sacha View the original post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3860094#3860094 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3860094

[JBoss-dev] [TODO -- DEVELOPMENT] - Naming services not initialized

Hi All, My application is running on JBOSS-2.2.1_Tomcat-3.2.1. It says [Naming] Initialization failed. Its running on jdk1.3.1_10. OS - Win 2K. I'm pasting the error i got. Is there any security restriction on my JVM that is causing this problem ? Pls give me a immediate solution. Thx in a

[JBoss-dev] [Deployers on JBoss (Deployers/JBoss)] - Customized deployers

Hello everyone, I was wondering if it is sth. common that people customizes the deployers. I was thinking of developing a deployer that would be activated by, let say an xml file with the suffix .suf copyied in a deploy dir and would trigger a java code packed as a jar file in jboss. May be you

[JBoss-dev] [Design of JBoss Internal Benchmarking] - Re: Jboss-SPECjAppServer2002 fails

I am using Jboss4.0.0. I tried your option,Even that says ClassLoaders not found!! View the original post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3860088#3860088 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3860088 --

[JBoss-dev] [Design of JBoss Internal Benchmarking] - SPECjAppServer2002 Driver fails!

hello group, when i try to run driver after deployment,i get the foll err.can anyone help out?? # sh bin/driver.sh Apps server is jboss32 Driver Host: kaveri Binding controller to //kaveri.kovaiteam.com/Controller Controller: Registering M1 on machine 172.16.1.158 M1 started ... Controller: Regis

[JBoss-dev] [Deployers on JBoss (Deployers/JBoss)] - Re: Customized deployers

You might have a look at the beanshell-Deployer or the aop-Deployer. The latter even gives an example on how to insert your suffix into the deployment order. View the original post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3860086#3860086 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.o

[JBoss-dev] [JBossWS] - wrapped document/literal

Hi. Did i understood correctly from http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&t=56424and http://www.jboss.org/?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3858513 that JBoss supports only pure document/literal (not wrapped) with single parameter per method only? And it is impossible to make it w

[JBoss-dev] [Design of Mail Services] - Re: Milestone 2

Andy, wow that was longish. I personally think, JBMail should aim at one goal - being a sendmail/qmail replacement OR being an Exchange replacement. In practice, you don't want to run exchange on a mail-router, while in an enterprise, you want Exchange for collaboration and the use with intra e

<    1   2