I'm seeing this org.jboss.test.jbossmq.test.ExpiryDestinationTestCase
fail due to timing issues? The test is failing because the dlq count is
not 2000. Its both below and above. Is this a reliable test?
Scott Stark
VP Architecture & Technology
JBoss Inc.
x
Title: Message
unsubscribe
View results here -> http://cruisecontrol.jboss.com/cc/buildresults/jboss-remoting-testsuite-1.5?log=log20060328223035
TESTS FAILEDAnt Error Message: /services/cruisecontrol/work/scripts/build-jboss-remoting.xml:96: The following error occurred while executing this line: /services/cruisecontrol/wo
Looks ok now.
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
> Behalf Of Clebert Suconic
> Sent: Tuesday, March 28, 2006 8:23 PM
> To: jboss-development@lists.sourceforge.net
> Subject: RE: [JBoss-dev] Why isn't server building?
>
> It should be fixed now
FYI, it *does* have remoting 1.4.1 now. Thanks for your help Clebert.
Clebert Suconic wrote:
It should be fixed now.
BTW I've removed org.jboss.util.stream.IMarshalledValue
It was confusing to have IMarshalledValue in both versions.
Since org.jboss.util.stream.IMarshalledValue wasn't introd
It should be fixed now.
BTW I've removed org.jboss.util.stream.IMarshalledValue
It was confusing to have IMarshalledValue in both versions.
Since org.jboss.util.stream.IMarshalledValue wasn't introduced in a final
version, I thought it should be okay removing it.
Clebert
___
No objection from me.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I want to drop the unsupported/unmaintained loadbalancer.sar from the
> varia module.
>
>
> Scott Stark
> VP Architecture & Technology
> JBoss Inc.
>
>
>
>
>
The following use it:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] jboss-4.0.x]$ find . -name build.xml -exec grep -l
gnu.regexp {} \;
./aspects/build.xml
./jmx/build.xml
./messaging/build.xml
./testsuite/build.xml
./varia/build.xml
I would like to replace these uses with the java.util.regex package in
4.0.x+ since j2se1.4
Title: Re: [JBoss-dev] Why isn't server building?
I didn't commit my changes. I
was waiting the newer version of Remoting.
I will be looking into that
now.
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] on behalf of Tom
ElrodSent: Tue 3/28/2006 8:51 PMTo:
jboss-development@lists.sourceforge.netSubject: Re:
View results here -> http://cruisecontrol.jboss.com/cc/buildresults/jboss-4.0-jdk-matrix?log=log20060328215250
BUILD FAILEDAnt Error Message: /services/cruisecontrol/work/scripts/build-jboss-common.xml:220: The following error occurred while executing this line: /services/cruisecontrol/work/script
I think jmx server uses (or at least used to use) gnu-regexp
Scott M Stark wrote:
Where are all of these thirdparty elements being used such that they are
specified here? In particular, what is using the * ones?
*
*
*
*
I think this has to do with moving the IMarshalledValue out of common
and into remoting (which would be in the remoting 1.4.1 release). I
know Clebert was waiting on the upgrade to 1.4.1 to commit his changes
to 4.0 branch that reflected this change (am guess he made that commit?)
Scott M Sta
I want to drop the unsupported/unmaintained loadbalancer.sar from the
varia module.
Scott Stark
VP Architecture & Technology
JBoss Inc.
---
This SF.Net email is sponsored by xPML,
View results here -> http://cruisecontrol.jboss.com/cc/buildresults/jboss-4.0-jdk-matrix?log=log20060328204730
BUILD FAILEDAnt Error Message: /services/cruisecontrol/work/scripts/build-jboss-common.xml:220: The following error occurred while executing this line: /services/cruisecontrol/work/script
Only compile time.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> So is there a runtime dependency on something or is this only compile
> time?
>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
>> Brian Stansberry Sent: Tuesday, March 28, 2006 5:48 PM
>> To: jboss-
So is there a runtime dependency on something or is this only compile
time?
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
> Behalf Of Brian Stansberry
> Sent: Tuesday, March 28, 2006 5:48 PM
> To: jboss-development@lists.sourceforge.net
> Subject: RE: [JB
My common, server, and remoting thirdparty are in synch with the 4.0
branch but there is a conflict:
[javac]
C:\cvs\JBoss4.0\jboss-4.0.x\server\src\main\org\jboss\invocation\Inv
okerInterceptor.java:285: incompatible types
[javac] found :
org.jboss.remoting.serialization.impl.jboss.Local
qdox is used in the testsuite to do annotationc pre-processing to some
classes used in field granularity replication tests.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Where are all of these thirdparty elements being used such
> that they are specified here? In particular, what is using the * ones?
> *
>
Where are all of these thirdparty elements being used such that they are
specified here? In particular, what is using the * ones?
*
*
*
*
*
* Can this be
dropped from jbossxb?
*
View results here -> http://cruisecontrol.jboss.com/cc/buildresults/jboss-4.0-jdk-matrix?log=log20060328190306
BUILD FAILEDAnt Error Message: /services/cruisecontrol/work/scripts/build-jboss-common.xml:220: The following error occurred while executing this line: /services/cruisecontrol/work/script
Well, with what I did yesterday both servers in the cluster started
properly, but the tests still failed on the last cruisecontrol run.
I'll see if I can figure out what is going on.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Ok, I think Brian already addressed those.
>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: [EM
I'm going to try locally remoting 1.4.1_final on 4.x with jdk1.4
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
> Behalf Of Ryan Campbell
> Sent: 28 March, 2006 23:49
> To: jboss-development@lists.sourceforge.net
> Subject: RE: [JBoss-dev] Do a clean buil
Ok, I think Brian already addressed those.
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
> Behalf Of Emmanuel Bernard
> Sent: Tuesday, March 28, 2006 2:39 PM
> To: jboss-development@lists.sourceforge.net
> Subject: Re: [JBoss-dev] Do a clean build before
Focus on clustered issues, the other ones should be ignored.
Scott M Stark wrote:
I'm working with the ejb3 tests as part of the installer testing. I
don't intend to fix all of them but if there are obvious mistakes I'll
try to fix them.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Don't worry this isn't needed to switch to 1.4.1. (We didn't have in
1.4.0)
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:jboss-
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Dimitris
Andreadis
> Sent: Tuesday, March 28, 2006 3:00 PM
> To: jboss-development@lists.sourceforge.net
> Subject: RE:
View results here -> http://cruisecontrol.jboss.com/cc/buildresults/jboss-4.0-jdk-matrix?log=log20060328163424Lbuild.966
BUILD COMPLETE - build.966Date of build: 03/28/2006 16:34:24Time to build: 16 minutes 57 secondsLast changed: 03/28/2006 15:15:47Last log entry: re-adding 40
I'm working with the ejb3 tests as part of the installer testing. I
don't intend to fix all of them but if there are obvious mistakes I'll
try to fix them.
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
> Behalf Of Dimitris Andreadis
> Sent: Tuesday, March
You can try that, although I see tom's comment about having to map the
org.jboss.ws.* properties to org.jboss.remoting.*
http://jira.jboss.com/jira/browse/JBWS-683
We also need a non-snapshot release from Alexey
(http://jira.jboss.com/jira/browse/JBAS-3011) or we can just copy the
current snapsh
I'm going to test jbossws-1.0.0.CR6 with remoting-1.4.1_final in
jboss-head with jdk5. If it passes, I'd like to update the
component-info for jbossws-1.0.0.CR6 to reflect this compatibility.
If this can get resolved today vs. tomorrow, perhaps we have some hope
of releasing this week?
-Orig
View results here -> http://cruisecontrol.jboss.com/cc/buildresults/jboss-4.0-jdk-matrix?log=log20060328141317
BUILD FAILEDAnt Error Message: /services/cruisecontrol/work/scripts/build-jboss-common.xml:220: The following error occurred while executing this line: /services/cruisecontrol/work/script
Ok. I have rolled back to 1.4.0. The web services team can put back to
1.4.1 when they are ready.
Scott M Stark wrote:
Start doing a clean build before committing any changes to
build-thirdparty.xml to avoid this consistent problem:
[synchronizeinfo] Checking currentComponentRef:
ComponentRe
Start doing a clean build before committing any changes to
build-thirdparty.xml to avoid this consistent problem:
[synchronizeinfo] Checking currentComponentRef:
ComponentRef{id=jboss/remoting,n
ame=jboss/remoting,filename=component-info.xml,location=null,version=1.4
.0_final
,[EMAIL PROTECTED],
v
View results here -> http://cruisecontrol.jboss.com/cc/buildresults/jboss-seam-testsuite?log=log20060328075432
TESTS FAILEDAnt Error Message: /services/cruisecontrol/work/scripts/build-jboss-seam-testsuite.xml:132: The following error occurred while executing this line: /services/cruisecontrol/wor
I've made a new release and added it to the repository.
The testsuite builds fine now, and the aop tests pass. The build no longer adds
deploy/jboss-aop.deployer/javassist.jar since this is now in
lib.
http://jira.jboss.com/jira/browse/JBAS-3017
From: Kabir Khan [mailto:[EMAIL
View results here -> http://cruisecontrol.jboss.com/cc/buildresults/jboss-remoting-testsuite-1.5?log=log20060328051604
TESTS FAILEDAnt Error Message: /services/cruisecontrol/work/scripts/build-jboss-remoting.xml:96: The following error occurred while executing this line: /services/cruisecontrol/wo
View results here -> http://cruisecontrol.jboss.com/cc/buildresults/jboss-remoting-testsuite-1.4?log=log20060328042518
TESTS FAILEDAnt Error Message: /services/cruisecontrol/work/scripts/build-jboss-remoting.xml:96: The following error occurred while executing this line: /services/cruisecontrol/wo
View results here -> http://cruisecontrol.jboss.com/cc/buildresults/jboss-cache-testsuite?log=log20060328034839Lbuild.51
BUILD COMPLETE - build.51Date of build: 03/28/2006 03:48:39Time to build: 35 minutes 55 secondsLast changed: 03/28/2006 01:56:08Last log entry: *** empty log
Ah yes, I tested with a version compiled against the new
javassist. I will release again
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Scott M StarkSent: 28 March 2006 03:02To: Ryan
Campbell; jboss-developmentCc: QASubject: [JBoss-dev]
RE: jboss-4.0-test
38 matches
Mail list logo
