It does look like it is aop$classAdvisor$aop. Static initialization should always
happen, not sure why it isn't in this case.
would it be possible to put together a small test case we can reproduce the problem
with?
Apologies,
Bill
View the original post :
Another question:
Are you using the precompiler? Or load time? or both?
Bill
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bbop=viewtopicp=3853950#3853950
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bbop=postingmode=replyp=3853950
Yes, send it via email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
FYI: hot deployment is a bitch.
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bbop=viewtopicp=3853954#3853954
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bbop=postingmode=replyp=3853954
FYI, I have done ZERO testing with scoped classloading and JBoss AOP.
FYI2:
If you figure out this bug, and you want CVS access, you got it! I STILL have a hard
time debugging hot deployment bugs whenever they come up.
Bill
View the original post :
You are correct, it is a bug, we'll get right on fixing this.
apologies
Bill
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bbop=viewtopicp=3853778#3853778
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bbop=postingmode=replyp=3853778
FYI, this isn't implemented, just discussing how to implement...
What do you think the semantics should be? And what does AspectJ support in this
regard?
Thanks,
Bill
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bbop=viewtopicp=3853788#3853788
Reply to the post :
I should say: What do you WANT the semantics to be, since this is your feature
request :-)
Bill
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bbop=viewtopicp=3853804#3853804
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bbop=postingmode=replyp=3853804
I see the usecase for this. It would be trivial to implement, but let's argue on the
correct syntax and contract.
| extends expr=org.MyTestCase from=test.MySuperClass/
|
The rules are that MySuperClass must extend the class MyTestCase extends.
Anything else?
View the original post :
You can scope your HiveMind deployments. You cannot scope JBoss AOP deployments.
Check out the JBoss AS docs on how to do this.
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bbop=viewtopicp=3853657#3853657
Reply to the post :
copy the jboss-service in jboss-aop.deployer. I screwed up the dist target, apologies
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bbop=viewtopicp=3853438#3853438
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bbop=postingmode=replyp=3853438
i meant also to say that this should work in JBoss AOP
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bbop=viewtopicp=3853441#3853441
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bbop=postingmode=replyp=3853441
The SystemProperty jboss.aop.path can take multiple XML files. They are deployed in
the order you specify in the jboss.aop.path.
Also, jboss.aop.path can take a directory. If you specify a directory, it will load
all *aop.xml files in that directory.
The include is a bug though and we'll
you need to declare the Aspect in XML before referencing it.
| aspect class=aftt.weaving.MyAspect/
|
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bbop=viewtopicp=3853293#3853293
Reply to the post :
Because aspect also has a scope attribute which by default is PER_VM
| aspect class=Foo scope=PER_JOINPOINT/
|
Its also important because an aspect can take configuration as well.
Check out this doco:
http://docs.jboss.org/aop/aspect-framework/reference/en/html/xml.html#xml-aspect2
Yes, we will eventually fix this problem. It will take awhile because it requires
changes to Javassist to suport synchronized blocks. The synchronization is needed
otherwise you have problems with concurrent access to a POJO.
Bill
View the original post :
A workaround is to take out the include.
I'll have to put this on the TODO list.
Thanks for finding the bug and reporting,
Bill
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bbop=viewtopicp=3853202#3853202
Reply to the post :
I like declare error and declare warning. We cannot soften exceptions because JBoss
AOP is not an extension of the Java language, but rather 100% java.
Bill
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bbop=viewtopicp=3852923#3852923
Reply to the post :
Your pointcut expression is incorrect and will not match any methods on
PreparedStatement.
It should be:
| bind pointcut=call(* $instanceof{java.sql.PreparedStatement}-execute*(..))
|interceptor
class=com.apple.ist.rubyservice.aspects.SQLExecutionInterceptor/
| /bind
|
cvs -d:pserver:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/cvsroot/jboss login
cvs -z3 -d:pserver:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/cvsroot/jboss co jboss-head
jboss-head is not a module, but an alias (or whatever you call it in CVS).
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bbop=viewtopicp=3852931#3852931
No, it does not. It is on the TODO list and will be in a future release of JBoss AOP.
If you're interested in implementing it, please do. We'll give you CVS access to
commit your changes if you implement it.
Bill
View the original post :
Are you saying that Weblogic and Websphere barf if you have declared a method as
synchronized?
The synchronized methods are not on EJB business methods or callbacks, so I fail to
see how it violates the specification.
All the specification says is:
An enterprise bean must not use thread
I want to expand the SAR Deployer to accept annotated classes.
The way it would work would be as follows.
| @MBean(domain.name:service=something)
| public class MyClass implements MyClassMBean {...}
|
The SAR Deployer would browse the archive for all @MBean tagged classes
and create
Andre, thanks for your patience If you have any further bug fixes or enhancement
ideas, please don't hesitate to post on the forum!
Thanks again,
Bill
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bbop=viewtopicp=3852572#3852572
Reply to the post :
There is no InvocationResponse class. I think you are reading the old O'Reilly
article or using the wrong download package? It should be JBoss AOP 1.0.0 FINAL? Try
modifying an existing tutorial distribution.
View the original post :
JBoss AOP 1.0.0 Final production release is now ready for download. Much thanks goes
out to Kabir Khan and Marshall Culpepper for their hard work. They put a lot of their
free time into JBoss AOP before we hired them in September, and took on a tremendous
load when we did. This final release
What VM are you running on? I cannot see anything wrong with your code or XML..
Are you sure it is not your problem? They NPE seems to be coming from your own code.
When running with JBoss AOP 1.0.0 Final, do you get the line number for this line:
|
We had some guys implement an EMB solution about 6 months to a year ago. Not sure how
complete or robust it is. It is distributed with JBoss 4. If you're interested in
taking it over give me a buzz. [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bill
View the original post :
Squeak, does deploying an EAR alone with precompiled classes not work? It should. A
.aop file is not needed.
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bbop=viewtopicp=3851894#3851894
Reply to the post :
We will work on precedence after the 1.0 release. We're currently trying to close
bugs and finish documentation.
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bbop=viewtopicp=3851895#3851895
Reply to the post :
No, it is not possible with JBoss AOP. The reason? It is because there is no class
to massage...Our EJB implementation does not generate any class that implements the
home interface. If you implemented BMP customer finders or home methods on the bean
class, then yes, JBoss AOP could be used.
No, that is incorrect. Nothing implements the home interface (not even customer
finders and home methods) The EJB container handles home invocations dynamically or
these methods are implemented in methods on the Bean class as ejbFindMETHOD or
ejbHomeMETHOD methods.
Bill
View the original
I wonder if the javac target in Ant has the same problem as I based aopc on this code.
I will try and resolve your request...We need to release 1.0 this week as other JBoss
Inc. projects are waiting on it so I can't promise anything.
But, this is a serious usability bug, so I'll put cycles into
The way the AOP deployer works is that when jboss-aop.deployer is deployed, it inserts
.aop and aop.xml into the MainDeployer suffix list.
ARe you having problems?
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bbop=viewtopicp=3851713#3851713
Reply to the post :
I don't believe you can intercept code with JSPs within precompiling the JSPs.
You MAY be able to do this with JDK 5.0 and our instrumentor, or the new JDK 1.4
classloader stuff we have in HEAD. Kabir is going to take a look.
View the original post :
JBoss AOP works in two ways. Either you precompile your Java .class files to push in
the AOP stuff, or you set JBoss AOP up so that it does the bytecode transformations at
runtime when the class is loaded. Load-time transformation requires hooks into the
classloader.
With JDK 1.4, we
hany_bee,
What about a servlet filter or a Tomcat valve? This is how we implemented JBoss
Security integration with Tomcat. If you're dealing with web requests
(HttpServletRequests), then a filter or valve is probably a better solution anyways...
Thomas,
Kabir is working on JSP side of
Finally got around to fixing this. Its in CVS now, will be in 1.0 Final release this
week.
Bill
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bbop=viewtopicp=3851754#3851754
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bbop=postingmode=replyp=3851754
The jboss-common.jar dependency still exists. Why would it matter with other app
servers? Its only using a few org.jboss classes.
Read this and let me know if it answers your config questions:
http://docs.jboss.org/aop/aspect-framework/reference/en/html/xml.html#xml-aspect3
View the original
See section 4.4.4. You can write your own factory by implementing AspectFactory which
accepts an Element.
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bbop=viewtopicp=3851823#3851823
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bbop=postingmode=replyp=3851823
fixed in CVS. 1.0 will go out next week.
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bbop=viewtopicp=3851593#3851593
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bbop=postingmode=replyp=3851593
---
This
On within + get/set. This is not possible. We will look to adding this after the
1.0 release.
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bbop=viewtopicp=3851594#3851594
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bbop=postingmode=replyp=3851594
Yes, I wanted to do this as well for awhile.
I wanted aspects scoped per ClassLoader domain, per Loader Repository. If you're
interested in implementing, let's discuss over email some ideas.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
View the original post :
charles_blaxland wrote : I've been writing some aspects with JBoss AOP and I like it
a lot so far :)
|
| Some questions/suggestions:
|
| - The within scope limiter doesn't seem to work with field/set/get pointcuts?
Should it?
|
|
I'll add this to the list. So, the answer is
If you use load time transformation, then yes, it is definately more expensive to have
caller pointcuts although I haven't done any measurements. If you use the AOP
precompiler, doesn't really matter how slow it is...
Bill
View the original post :
BTW, feel free to advertise the aspects you are writing on our WIKI.
http://www.jboss.org/wiki/Wiki.jsp?page=ContributingYourOwnAspects
Bill
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bbop=viewtopicp=3851493#3851493
Reply to the post :
Not in there yet, but I think you can do it with either an introduction, or an
execution pointcut.
The introduction would introduce the read/writeObject method if the object did not
implement Externalizable. If the object does implement Externalizable, then intercept
the read/write of the
before/after returing/after throwing could easily be added to JBoss AOP with a day of
work,
But
Again, I still see this as nothing more than you wanting to avoid having a
try/catch/finally block, or to avoid calling invocation.invokeNext(). IMNSHO,
ordering of aspects and how the aspect
Thanks, fixed...
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bbop=viewtopicp=3850772#3850772
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bbop=postingmode=replyp=3850772
---
This SF.net email is sponsored
See here:
http://jboss.com/index.html?module=bbop=viewtopict=54897
Congrats to Marshall for putting together such great integration in such a short
period of time. Let's try and help him find some problems before the 1.0 release this
month of JBoss AOP!
Especially look at the tutorial.
oh, ok, good idea
i
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bbop=viewtopicp=3849991#3849991
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bbop=postingmode=replyp=3849991
---
This SF.net email is
you can't have multiple XML's per Jar file. BUT... You can have multiple JAR files
that have an xml file within them.
We could implement this thoughInterested in doing it?
Bill
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bbop=viewtopicp=3849868#3849868
Reply to the
Can you spec this out more? I don't understand what you mean.
Bill
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bbop=viewtopicp=3849908#3849908
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bbop=postingmode=replyp=3849908
Short answer is YES
For our new doco here:
http://docs.jboss.org/aop/aspect-framework/reference/en/html/running.html
anonymous wrote :
| You need to tell JBoss AOP where the xml configuration files of your bindings
are. This can be done in one of these two ways:
|
| * Set the
Not sure if this was clear enough, but there is brand new AOP documentation.
PDF, HTML.
The User guide is a work in progress, but the reference manual is mostly complete.
http://docs.jboss.org/aop/aspect-framework/
Regards,
Bill
View the original post :
what are the exact semantics of before/after?
You get the same thing with around. You want before?
| try
| {
| doBefore();
| invocation.invokeNext();
| }
|
You want after?
| try
| {
|Object rtn = invocation.invokeNext();
| doAfter();
| return
JBoss AOP RC1+ does not work with JBoss 3.2.5.
JBoss AOP RC1+ does work with JBoss 3.2.6RC1+ but only with the precompiler.
Bill
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bbop=viewtopicp=3849424#3849424
Reply to the post :
I'm pleased to announce the release of JBoss AOP 1.0 RC2. We're getting closer to our
1.0 release next month. Kabir Khan joined the team fulltime September 1st and has done
an amazing job helping out. We put a lot of effort into documentation this release and
have written a reference guide in
execution and set/get do not make sense with within as their purpose
is to totally wrap EVERY invocation.
within and withcode only make sense with call. I guess a callfield is necessary.
I'll add that to the TODO.
Bill
View the original post :
which error are you seeing?
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bbop=viewtopicp=3849285#3849285
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bbop=postingmode=replyp=3849285
---
This SF.Net email is
You must also have the jboss-aspect library within the lib/ directory.
Let me know if that fixes it.
Thanks,
Bill
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bbop=viewtopicp=3849294#3849294
Reply to the post :
What exactly is the error?
This WIKI page is out of date. It needs to be updated. I didn't get a chance to do
it before the FINAL release. We'll be putting out a detailed reference guide on
Friday.
The AspectDeployer service is not emedded in the aop.deployer jar and can be
configured in
Ok, I have updated the WIKI page. Let me know if that works for you.
Sorry for crappy installation. WE'll improve this with the next release.
Regards,
Bill
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bbop=viewtopicp=3849298#3849298
Reply to the post :
the bug is that he is using the AOP framework incorrectly. He must use $instanceof{}.
But, $instanceof{} is not complete in that it needs to support wildcards and
annotations which it does not now.
But, I'll add the fix to findMethodHash anyways.
Bill
View the original post :
you cannot get arg1 as it is higher in the stack.
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bbop=viewtopicp=3849319#3849319
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bbop=postingmode=replyp=3849319
---
BTW, the fix to findMethodByHash is in CVS and will be in RC2 on Friday.
Bill
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bbop=viewtopicp=3849343#3849343
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bbop=postingmode=replyp=3849343
Ok, RC1 will not work with JBoss 3.2.5 as the base deployer class has changed in 4.0.
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bbop=viewtopicp=3849344#3849344
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bbop=postingmode=replyp=3849344
Ok, this is fixed in HEAD and will be in RC2 release on Friday.
Bill
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bbop=viewtopicp=3849145#3849145
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bbop=postingmode=replyp=3849145
Your pointcut expression was incorrect. You must do
| call(* $instanceof{java.sql.Connection}-*(..))
|
Unfortunately, $instanceof cannot take wildcards at this time.
If this is it, let me know.
Thanks,
Bill
View the original post :
Is JCoverage free?
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bbop=viewtopicp=3849012#3849012
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bbop=postingmode=replyp=3849012
---
This SF.Net email is sponsored
Yikes, sorry I missed your post before
This may be a better approach:
| bind pointcut=execution(@my.root-new(..))
| interceptor class=RootCreationInterceptor /
| /bind
|
This will bind your interceptor to every constructor of every class tagged as @my.root.
Bill
yes, we absolutely need precedence. I hope it gets into the initial release.
What is your suggestion for syntax? Pure XML? A Package annotation? Per Aspect or
Per Advice?
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bbop=viewtopicp=3848790#3848790
Reply to the post :
We would defintely be interested in it if you were willing to maintain and document it.
Contact me: [EMAIL PROTECTED] and CC [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bill
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bbop=viewtopicp=3848791#3848791
Reply to the post :
I'm looking for some use cases for our pointcut language supporting local variable
annotations. Anybody have any ideas?
Bill
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bbop=viewtopicp=3848799#3848799
Reply to the post :
You may be able to use JBossCache. I'm not sure if you can register to listen for
cache changes (so that you can update the aspectmanager), but you could use JBossCache
and use JGroups to send a notification to the cluster to update the AspectManagers.
What Im REALLY interested in is a
If you have an interesting aspect you would like to contribute and are willing to
document and maintain it, please contact us: [EMAIL PROTECTED] We will include it in
our documentation and give you CVS access.
Bill
View the original post :
Bill Burke wrote:
Does JBoss cache have the ability to register for cache changes? I have an AOP user
that is building a dynamic cluster-wide aspect manager. They need the ability to
have a replicated shared cluster-wide structure, but need to be able to notify on
changes so that they can
The caller pointcut should not be called.You can use the -report switch with the
precompiler (the ant task would be report=true) and it will dump out all matching
joinpoints and the bindings that they are attached to.
a) are you using a call pointcut anywhere? It looks like you are. (or
I think I know what the problem is. I don't think Javasssist's copy method copy's
CodeAttributes which have the line numbers. I'll see what I can do.
Bill
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bbop=viewtopicp=3848596#3848596
Reply to the post :
If a particular joinpoint is prepared you do not have to recompile or even shutdown
the JVM to add or remove an advice from a particular joinpoint. You can also
add/remove interceptors on a per instance basis at runtime with a prepared joinpoint.
How to prepare?
This will instrument the
In JBoss 4.0 and J2EE 1.4. Stateless Session EJBs can be exposed as web services.
You can propagate principal and credentials using basic auth, but the spec really
doesn't specify security semantics.
Security isn't difficult to write as an aspect, but what is difficult is plugging in
how the
http://java.sun.com/xml/jaxrpc/
http://www.jcp.org/en/jsr/detail?id=109
http://jcp.org/aboutJava/communityprocess/final/jsr153/index.html
You will have to write a Handler to propagate principal and credential information.
If you want role-based security at the POJO level, check out these
If you specify -report, it will not transform the classes. Why aren't you using our
ant tasks?
For an example of the ant tasks, look in the tutorial.
Bill
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bbop=viewtopicp=3847174#3847174
Reply to the post :
the syntax is:
| introduction expr=!class($instanceof{LoggableImpl}) ...
|
Yes, the doco sucks. Kabir and I will put some effort into it before the last release.
Bill
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bbop=viewtopicp=3847023#3847023
Reply to the post :
Short answer Try:
| $ run -c all
|
Long answer:
It is not really a problem, let me explain:
If you get a clean download of JBoss Application Server and set EnableTransformer to
true, you will see those stack traces. Why?
When you set EnableTransformer to true, it will try and
FYI, this is a dev list, not user questions/problems...
Are you using your own container configurations? I think the defaults may have
changed for JBoss 3.2.5 from 3.23
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bbop=viewtopicp=3846897#3846897
Reply to the post :
Doesn't seem to be any activity in 6 months. Is anybody using this module? We may
remove it from the official download.
Bill
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bbop=viewtopicp=3846949#3846949
Reply to the post :
.
On a related note. AOP is now packaged as a .deployer file.
Bill
--
Bill Burke
Chief Architect
JBoss Inc.
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bbop=viewtopicp=3846951#3846951
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bbop
Just committed code to take advantage of JDK 5.0's java.lang.instrument package. I
think we may even be able to instrument JDK system classes with this approach.
Haven't tried yet.
To try it out, build the distribution and look at the build scripts of the tutorial.
Bill
View the original
--
JBossAOP 1.0 RC1
--
* New $typedef feature. Allows you to define type expressions, name them, then use
them in pointcut definitions. See the typedef example in tutorial.
* added PER_JOINPOINT scoping for Aspects. An aspect instance is allocated per
joinpoint.
* aop
fixed in RC1
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bbop=viewtopicp=3846184#3846184
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bbop=postingmode=replyp=3846184
---
SF.Net email is sponsored by
Sorry, I've been giving training for the last wek and a half
I did not test JBoss integration with JB4 RC1 yet as I have not released JBoss AOP
Beta4(even though it comes bundled with JB4 RC1). You may have to revert AOP back to
Beta3.
If you can send me a simple test case, I can add it
I don't think JSP aspectizing will work as it uses a different classloader. We will
be improving our classloader integration shortly.
Can you verify JSPs don't work?
I do think it will work if you precompile your jsps.
Thanks and apologies.
Bill
View the original post :
1) If you want a singleton mixin, then you can put anything you want in the
construction XML element. So, the mixin reference can be set by calling a method or
setting it to a singleton field of some class.
2) Are you applying the introduction twice? How does C++ work? I want to model
1) PER-VM and PER-Instance are supported. It would be per-class that would have to be
supported.
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bbop=viewtopicp=3845766#3845766
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bbop=postingmode=replyp=3845766
Maybe the full file/directory path is too long? It is saying it cannot find file.
(The system cannot find the path specified)
I know there is a limit on windows. But it doesn't make sense that it doesn't work on
JDK 1.4.1. I'll put in a task to shorted generated classnames for the optimized
Can you try CVS Head? This may have been fixed there.
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bbop=viewtopicp=3844555#3844555
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bbop=postingmode=replyp=3844555
It should be:
| $ cvs checkout jboss-head
| $ cd jboss-head/aop
| $ build.sh dist
|
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bbop=viewtopicp=3844572#3844572
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bbop=postingmode=replyp=3844572
We know the problem and the bug fix for it. Will fix ASAP.
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bbop=viewtopicp=3844574#3844574
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bbop=postingmode=replyp=3844574
I think Scott and I discussed this a little before, but I'd like to have the EJB and
Web ENC be based on a ThreadLocal variable rather than using the context classloader
for determining the ENC.
Specially, store it in org.jboss.aop.metadata.ThreadMetaData.
Bill
View the original post :
Ok, that's a bug. I need to parse for float, int, etc...
apologies.
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bbop=viewtopicp=3844618#3844618
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bbop=postingmode=replyp=3844618
601 - 700 of 1981 matches
Mail list logo
