go ahead..
-- Juha
On Mon, 4 Jun 2001, Vincent Harcq wrote:
> Hi,
> Does it bother anybody if I add a LocalResolver of DTD for //Sun
> Microsystems, Inc.//DTD Enterprise JavaBeans 2.0//EN
> to a local version of http://java.sun.com/dtd/ejb-jar_2_0.dtd ?
> Vincent.
__
On Fri, 1 Jun 2001, marc fleury wrote:
> to clear fuck-ups... yet if you screw up it doesn't hide the mistake, your
> application won't work.
yes... but I want to know exactly *WHY* it doesn't work :)
> |I'd much rather see the lookup fail than have the server hide my fuck ups.
> |Because that
On Fri, 1 Jun 2001, Ferguson, Doug wrote:
> It will be trial to remove the topic/queue at undeployment,
> if and only if I added it at deploy time
ok..
> We already display a message at deploytime that says that
> the queue/topic doesn't exist. So it isn't really correct
> that the serve
On Fri, 1 Jun 2001, marc fleury wrote:
> 1- If it is not there, right now we have to manually go and create the damn
> thing, very redundant.
> 2- If you miss the spelling.. we should put a message saying "Creating
> topic" and that's it.. very convenient.
In this case, no, its not very conveni
On Fri, 1 Jun 2001, Peter Antman wrote:
>
> You see what will happen? Yes, the client will send its messages to one
> topic (no automatic creation here), and the MDB will listen on ANOTHER
> topic, namely a to the system unknown destination, since it was not
> correctly spelled.
>
> What do you
On Mon, 7 May 2001, marc fleury wrote:
> Juha, when we were in London, debugged that to work the right way so we
> could demo how the remote installation worked. Juju, do you have that fix
> in mind still? care to put it in?
I think Vinay committed the fix on Saturday. Not sure all the cases y
Yes,
please go ahead and implement this
-- Juha
On Sat, 5 May 2001, danch wrote:
> Does anyone have opinions on whether this would be a good feature or
> not? The 1.1 spec does not specify how isolation levels should be
> handled, except for BMT session beans, and by saying/implying that bea
Scott,
the current CVS checkout won't compile because ServiceMBean interface is
missing STARTING and STARTED variables which are required by the
NamingAlias class.
-- Juha
___
Jboss-development mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.sourceforg
Hi,
On Mon, 16 Apr 2001, Jason Dillon wrote:
> Any preferences on how to continue? My bias would be to commit these
> changes soon, so I can move on to other bits. This will effect OpenJMS
> users, so we should probably add that to a release note also.
yeah I think you can commit it.. if peop
Hi,
On Sat, 14 Apr 2001, Jason Dillon wrote:
> Just to clarify, I should talk to Peter about adding a openjms contrib
> module.
Yes, he knows the code.
> And for the tests, this is from the jbosstest module... perhaps
> the bin/mdbtest.sh script?
Yep.
> Is there more documentation on this
Please use the JBoss-User list for support questions.
Thanks
-- Juha
On Thu, 12 Apr 2001, Andy Comley wrote:
> Having followed the documentation "JAAS Based Security in JBoss", I get a
> "ClassCastException" on the server during the authentication stage (no
> matter whether the user logging i
On Wed, 11 Apr 2001, Julian Gosnell wrote:
> AFAIK, the advantage of Dynamic MBeans is that they
> are not statically constrained by inheritance and may
> vary their interfaces dynamically at run time.
>
> Both of these demonstrate the inadequacy of simply
> checking the inheritance of a potenti
On Wed, 11 Apr 2001, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I still don't see anything wrong with type check for
> org.jboss.util.Service.
Me neither. That should be enough to identify the mbeans adhering to the
JBoss service life cycle management.
Will you make this change?
-- Juha
__
On Wed, 11 Apr 2001, Peter Braswell wrote:
> I'm using a W2K machine. I've tried jCVS (no support
> for ssh), winCVS (seems to support ssh, but won't work
> properly) and cygwin's command line CVS from within
> the Unix shell. Nothing seems to work.
Cygwin pretty much works out of the box for
Try now.
-- Juha
On Tue, 10 Apr 2001, Bill Burke wrote:
> I don't seem to have permission to add a task at the sourceforge site
> even though I have rw access. Does it work?
>
> Thanks in advance,
> Bill
>
>
>
> ___
> Jboss-development mailing list
On Thu, 5 Apr 2001, Bill Burke wrote:
> Still want this done? If so, should I create a task(or Bug?) in SourceForge and
>assign it to myself?
you should be able to add a todo task for yourself, still testing, let me
know how it goes.
> BTW, do people still use the old Bugs database? If I'm
http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?group_id=22866&atid=376687
Anything else will be discarded.
-- Juha
On Wed, 4 Apr 2001, Samuel Niles Peretz wrote:
> org/jboss/logging/Log.java:
>
> Changed use of deprecated DataInputStream.readLine method to use preferred
> BufferedReader.readLine instead in
Submitting Patches
--
All patches (diffs and code snippets) should be submitted through the
Sourceforge Patch Tracker interface:
http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?group_id=22866&atid=376687
Use the submit form on this page if you want your patch to make it into
the CVS tree. Your
On Thu, 29 Mar 2001, Jay Walters wrote:
> I'm not good with names, but how
> about jboss-ee, jboss-external, ee-spec or just external?
Why not just drop it under contrib/ in its own submodule (api?) and then a
module per API? Seems these might find some use outside the JBoss project
as well.
well.. ermm..
there's the ant documentation for the task... *cough*
:)
-- Juha
On Thu, 29 Mar 2001, marc fleury wrote:
> Oh goodness!!! it is of course well documented isn't it?
>
> marc
>
>
> |-Original Message-
> |From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> |Sent: Thursd
You don't need an explicit task for it,
see admin/build.xml for an example
http://cvs.sourceforge.net/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/admin/build/build.xml?cvsroot=jboss
--8<--
--8<--
-- Juha
On Thu, 29 Mar 2001, marc fleury wrote:
> Any news on the
Hi,
On Mon, 26 Mar 2001, Jung , Dr. Christoph wrote:
> Browsing through the spec, I could not find a in Chapter 6 that requires
> create methods to be non-final.
EJB 1.1, 6.10.3 ejbCreate Methods
* the method must not be declared final or static
-- Juha
___
101 - 122 of 122 matches
Mail list logo
