[JBoss-dev] [Javassist development Forum] - Differences between 3.0-rc-1 and 3.0?

2005-03-31 Thread hlship
I just noticed that a 3.0 (presumably final) release is available. What are the differences between this and the RC1 release candidate? Also, I'm beginning to look at using Annotations with Tapestry and Javassist. My plan for Tapestry 5.0 is to read annotations at class load time and modify

[JBoss-dev] [Javassist development Forum] - try ... finally

2004-10-04 Thread hlship
The docs for 3.0 still state that try ... finally is not supported. Is this true? I would very much like to use Javassist for a particular application, but being able to use a finally clause is critical. View the original post :

[JBoss-dev] [Javassist development Forum] - Re: Debugging with Javassist

2004-02-27 Thread hlship
As an example, what would be nice if Javassist would write the code-markup text to a temporary file and add line number information for its code that pointed to that file, so that a debugger (such as Eclipse) could step through the source. Currently, when users step into a method dynamically

[JBoss-dev] [Javassist development Forum] - Re: Debugging with Javassist

2004-02-27 Thread hlship
Oh ... and both Tapestry and HiveMind don't modify existing sources, they always create new classes entirely (often as enhanced subclasses of existing, user-provided classes). I can see that trying to do what I suggest for full-bore AOP would be a great challenge, but for new classes created

[JBoss-dev] RE: [Tapestry-developer] .jwc files

2002-10-03 Thread hlship
Tapestry doesn't care about file extensions. By convention, page-specifications are .page and component-specifications are .jwc. Earlier versions of tapestry didn't differentiate between page-specification and component-specification, pages and components alike used .jwc. -- [EMAIL

[JBoss-dev] Re: [Tapestry-developer] attach() not called

2002-09-19 Thread hlship
I don't have enough information to proceed from here. Are you doing anything tricky on this page, such as Block/RenderBlock? It sounds like something, somewhere, is holding a reference to a component or page not within the current page. Nothing in Tapestry does that. Are you passing a

[JBoss-dev] Re: [Tapestry-developer] Why not let components be declared that aren't used?

2002-09-10 Thread hlship
It would be easy enough to make it simply log an error instead of throwing an exception. -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://tapestry.sf.net Phil Surette wrote: (snip) wouldn't care)? It's a nice feature to be able to be able to automatically detect cruft when you're in cleanup mode, but when

[JBoss-dev] Tapestry-developer unsubscribe notification (fwd)

2002-06-21 Thread hlship
I just removed Mr. Morales from the list because of all the bounced messages. Hopefully he can resubscribe once he resolves his mail issues. -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://tapestry.sf.net -- Forwarded Message: - From:[EMAIL PROTECTED] To:

RE: [JBoss-dev] JDK 1.4 use in JBoss

2002-06-18 Thread hlship
Yeah, what I do in this case is define an interface and supply per-JVM implementations of the interface. I instantiate them (from class name) starting with the JDK 1.4 version and, if that fails, back to the 1.3, 1.2, etc. version. The trick is to compile each class with the correct