anonymous wrote : JBossMQ already has redelivery delay/count
I know, the specs (and comment in the jboss code) specifically state however
that ordered delivery of redelivered messages is not gueranteed. This would be
a first addition I think. Bea also does this and mentiones this as a unique
Hi,
I've been working with Hermes, the freebXML ebMS server. They have developed
lots of things that are already in J2EE (like transactions, a connectionpool)
for resons beyond *my* comprehension. Users say they just want to be able to
run it in a simple servlet engine, so anything other than
Did I realy not read the installation notes carefully enough? Shame on me. I
apologize deeply since I thought it would be something like this but still
overlooked it in the notes.
[5 minute delay]
Well... I just reread the notes and have to revoke my previous remark. I did
read the notes ok.
Yikes... I just finished installing the alpha version 10 minutes ago..
Downloaded that last week... well... trying again;-)
btw... any progress on the webui for jBPM? any portlets for 3.0? That was what
I was going to try to do.
View the original post :
I just removed alpha1 and installed beta1 on a fresh jboss server (nothing else
on it besides portal). The alpha1 was 'working'. Starting up the server with
beta1 in it gives me the error below. My systemconfig is:
JBoss [Zion] 4.0.1sp1 (build: CVSTag=JBoss_4_0_1_SP1 date=200502160314)
It's compliant with 3.0. Look at the jbpm forums on SF for some topics on this
issue.
Ronald
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bbop=viewtopicp=3866401#3866401
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bbop=postingmode=replyp=3866401
I'd like to see reverse xdoclet support, so I can very easily show my bosses
that application currently running on Bea can run easily on jBoss (without the
runtime deployment converter, cause that scares them although it works for some
applications)
View the original post :
Thanks Roy.
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bbop=viewtopicp=3855972#3855972
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bbop=postingmode=replyp=3855972
---
SF email is sponsored by - The IT
tom.baeyens wrote :
|
| Do you think that offering a BPM-module with JBoss is a good idea ?
|
Yes it is
tom.baeyens wrote :
| Do you think jBpm would be a good base to start from ?
|
Yes it is
Goodluck,
Ronald
View the original post :
