Yes, the constructor interceptor runs in the context of the calling code.
Uninstrumented code:
POJO pojo = new POJO();
Instrumented and intercepted - (pseudo code):
POJO pojo = POJO.staticMethodReplacingConstructor();
With a stacktrace similar to this:
POJO.PoolingInterceptor.invoke();
Sweet. Thanks.
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bbop=viewtopicp=3831086#3831086
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bbop=postingmode=replyp=3831086
---
This SF.Net email is sponsored by:
Do I still need to call invocation.invokeNext(), or will I be missing executing some
constructor processing if I don't?
Like:
invokation.invokeNext();
o = Static.method();
return o;
Steve
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bbop=viewtopicp=3831099#3831099
Reply
No, you do not have to call invokeNext.
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bbop=viewtopicp=3831101#3831101
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bbop=postingmode=replyp=3831101
---
This
In fact, it isn't that you don't have to, you don't want to.
invocation.invokeNext() will lead to the real constructor creating an Object instance
you don't want.
When you do want to invoke the real constructor, use reflection.
POJO.class.newInstance();
Regards,
Adrian
View the original post :
Bill: One of the aspects tests actually creates a proxy and returns that instead.
Is that in the AOP examples, or in jbosstest?
Bill: You can also do call side constructor interception of you only want to use the
pool in certain code structures.
I think Adrian mentioned that as well, in the
Let me know if the tutorial is complete enough and answers your questions well enough.
Thanks,
Bill
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bbop=viewtopicp=3831137#3831137
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bbop=postingmode=replyp=3831137
All of the examples use invocation.invokeNext(). It might be nice to see an example
that doesn't use it (i.e. the proxy you mentioned before).
Do one of the unit tests do that? I'm looking through the jbosstest AOP tests and none
of them jump out at me for a Proxy.
View the original post :
Do-Does. English. Grammar. Whatever.
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bbop=viewtopicp=3831140#3831140
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bbop=postingmode=replyp=3831140
---
This SF.Net
