Hi there,
Regarding this:
charles_blaxland wrote :
| - It appears that you can't refer back to a previously defined typedef when
defining an introduction? (ie: in a similar way to how you can refer back to a
previous pointcut definition when defining an interceptor). What I would like to
On within + get/set. This is not possible. We will look to adding this after the
1.0 release.
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bbop=viewtopicp=3851594#3851594
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bbop=postingmode=replyp=3851594
charles_blaxland wrote : I've been writing some aspects with JBoss AOP and I like it
a lot so far :)
|
| Some questions/suggestions:
|
| - The within scope limiter doesn't seem to work with field/set/get pointcuts?
Should it?
|
|
I'll add this to the list. So, the answer is
Great, thanks Bill!
Bill Burke wrote :
| Does this work for you???
|
| http://docs.jboss.org/aop/aspect-framework/misc/reflection.html
|
Cool - this is very nice and will do exactly what I want :-)
Out of curiosity, is there much overhead in adding global call/field pointcuts (ie:
If you use load time transformation, then yes, it is definately more expensive to have
caller pointcuts although I haven't done any measurements. If you use the AOP
precompiler, doesn't really matter how slow it is...
Bill
View the original post :
BTW, feel free to advertise the aspects you are writing on our WIKI.
http://www.jboss.org/wiki/Wiki.jsp?page=ContributingYourOwnAspects
Bill
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bbop=viewtopicp=3851493#3851493
Reply to the post :
