If we were to change to a different implementation (e.g. the java5 implementations) they need to have the same semantics.
They could also be implemented with Collections.synchronizedXXX() except the behaviour of iterator.remove() is different to oswego concurrent in some places like the CopyOnWrite implementations. View the original post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3862956#3862956 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3862956 ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by: IntelliVIEW -- Interactive Reporting Tool for open source databases. Create drag-&-drop reports. Save time by over 75%! Publish reports on the web. Export to DOC, XLS, RTF, etc. Download a FREE copy at http://www.intelliview.com/go/osdn_nl _______________________________________________ JBoss-Development mailing list JBoss-Development@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development
