Dain Sundstrom wrote:
I stand corrected. I just assumed that you defined the class in the bean
impl. I still wouldn't recoment it just because if find it anoying to type
Parrent.InnerClass return type.
Hey, it's not so bad - now I just have to write Agent.Data instead of
AgentData :-).
Hmmm. I'm not sure I agree entirely:
1. the value object is effectively part of the interface because it is
what is returned by the getData methods etc. So the client has to have
access to it and I don't see anything drastically wrong with having the
data bean as an inner class of the
Dain Sundstrom wrote:
Luke,
In general, it is not really to use an innerclass as a type in a public api.
In EJB it is a worse Idea. I think the verifier is complaining that your
class is not serializable. On page 217 of Josh Block's book Effective Java
her states Inner classes should
-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, August 03, 2001 9:59 AM
Subject: [JBoss-dev] Apparent bug in Verifier - static inner classes as
valid RMI/IIOP types
Hi all,
Can't get any access to Sourceforge so posting here instead...
I tried moving a value data bean
