RE: [JBoss-dev] BasicMBeanRegistry and class loader MBeans

2002-08-11 Thread marc fleury
> I agree we are beyond the spec here. Queue Marc's dance :-) Going boldly where no spec writer has gone, look like you are running stupidly one arm up (left) right leg up behind you, look at the sky with a stupid smile... wwwh! you are running! tada! going beyond the spec, marcf

Re: [JBoss-dev] BasicMBeanRegistry and class loader MBeans

2002-08-11 Thread Adrian Brock
gt;From: "Scott M Stark" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Subject: Re: [JBoss-dev] BasicMBeanRegistry and class loader MBeans >Date: Sat, 10 Aug 2002 12:22:25 -0700 > >Look at fixing it in head as there the BasicMBeanReg

Re: [JBoss-dev] BasicMBeanRegistry and class loader MBeans

2002-08-10 Thread Adrian Brock
The Mlet had not been converted to the UnifiedLoaderRepository2. Regards, Adrian >From: "Adrian Brock" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Subject: Re: [JBoss-dev] BasicMBeanRegistry and class loader MBeans >Date: Sat, 1

Re: [JBoss-dev] BasicMBeanRegistry and class loader MBeans

2002-08-10 Thread Adrian Brock
Ok, But I'm seeing failures in the MLet tests (before Scotts modificaiton). I'll investigate... Regards, Adrian >From: Juha-P Lindfors <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Subject: Re: [JBoss-dev] BasicMBeanRegistry and

Re: [JBoss-dev] BasicMBeanRegistry and class loader MBeans

2002-08-10 Thread Adrian Brock
vior. > > >Scott Stark >Chief Technology Officer >JBoss Group, LLC > >- Original Message - >From: "Adrian Brock" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Sent: Saturday, August 10, 2002 1

Re: [JBoss-dev] BasicMBeanRegistry and class loader MBeans

2002-08-10 Thread Juha-P Lindfors
On Sat, 10 Aug 2002, Scott M Stark wrote: > > This probably breaks the MLet processing. But then I think it > > was already broken, MLets are URLClassLoaders not UCLs. actually we detect ULR in the mlet code and register one UCL per URL in case ULR is used... -- Juha

Re: [JBoss-dev] BasicMBeanRegistry and class loader MBeans

2002-08-10 Thread Scott M Stark
- From: "Adrian Brock" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Saturday, August 10, 2002 11:44 AM Subject: Re: [JBoss-dev] BasicMBeanRegistry and class loader MBeans > Hi Scott, > > This is the specs/RIs mechanism for maintaining the LoaderRe

Re: [JBoss-dev] BasicMBeanRegistry and class loader MBeans

2002-08-10 Thread Adrian Brock
'll take a look at fixing this without breaking bug #592346 Regards, Adrian >From: "Scott M Stark" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Subject: [JBoss-dev] BasicMBeanRegistry and class loader MBeans >Date: Fri, 9 Au

[JBoss-dev] BasicMBeanRegistry and class loader MBeans

2002-08-09 Thread Scott M Stark
When one registers an MBean that is a ClassLoader the BasicMBeanRegistry adds it to the the default LoaderRepository. This breaks scoped class loading of services, and it really seems to be out of the scope of functionality that the BasicMBeanRegistry should assume. Really I don't see why the Basi