y35 j00 D1d. =P
thats pearl ?;) or BuildMagic lingo ?
That is l33t (http://www.geocities.com/mnstr_2000/translate.html)
While on topic of BM can U please explain what it does that ant task's can
not do ? and WHY do We have a top level BlackBox instead of a 'standard' way
to extend and
on 25-03-2 21.38, Jason Dillon at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
While on topic of BM can U please explain what it does that ant task's can
not do ? and WHY do We have a top level BlackBox instead of a 'standard' way
to extend and build with ant ! ... ? ...
If you can make Ant do what the current
Jason Dillon wrote:
I fail to see how you go from CVS to Buildmagic to Ant.
--jason
Through the one thing that connects the three: Jason Dillon!
-danch
___
Jboss-development mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
can U please explain what it does that ant task's can not do ?
1) Provides pseudo-late-binding for properties.
2) Provides helper tasks to set system properties, plus a few other
utilities .
3) Provides a mechanism to hook up multipule sub-projects based on
property configuration.
Perhaps
on 25-03-2 23.42, Jason Dillon at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
1) Provides pseudo-late-binding for properties.
2) Provides helper tasks to set system properties, plus a few other
utilities .
3) Provides a mechanism to hook up multipule sub-projects based on
property configuration.
Perhaps if
I would imagine all of the above could be split up and executed as ant tasks
? ...
That depends on what you mean... essentially that is what the bm tasks do.
how bout intergrating CVS ? ... into the build process ? ...
What about CVS do you want integrated?
--jason
on 25-03-2 23.58, Jason Dillon at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What about CVS do you want integrated?
dont know just freeflowing
- maybe a do a checkout and build - test cycle - ftp report to IP(lubega).
___
Jboss-development mailing list
[EMAIL
The cvs, ant and junit tests will let you do the first bit, then the ftp
task can hook up the rest... not that I would really recommend that.
Ant can do all this, it is just a matter of organization and time to
glue things together. Some of this has already been done. Talk with
Chris, he
This appears to be fixed. If you ever find a lock for anoncvs_jboss (or
really anoncvs anything) or a maximal lock, please submit a request to
drop those locks here:
http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=addgroup_id=1atid=21
Just explain that there is lock for the 'jboss' project and
I should be more specific, if there is a lock which persists for an
extended period of time let us know...
--jason
Jason Dillon wrote:
This appears to be fixed. If you ever find a lock for anoncvs_jboss
(or really anoncvs anything) or a maximal lock, please submit a
request to drop
on 25-03-2 00.25, Jason Dillon at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I should be more specific, if there is a lock which persists for an
extended period of time let us know...
We did - di We not ?
Should We have to do that ?
___
Jboss-development mailing
on 25-03-2 01.07, Jason Dillon at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
y35 j00 D1d. =P
thats pearl ?;) or BuildMagic lingo ?
While on topic of BM can U please explain what it does that ant task's can
not do ? and WHY do We have a top level BlackBox instead of a 'standard' way
to extend and build with
Hi Jason,
Sorry for the delay. If I'd just hung around 15 mins :-)
The full path is
/cvsroot/jboss/contrib/jetty/src/main/org/mortbay/jetty/jmx
The locks are held by anoncvs_jboss and maximal
Regards,
Adrian
Can you tell me what the full paths are that are
locked.
--jason
Adrian
IANACVSE - I am not a CVS expert :-)
It is correct that I can tag later if I keep
CVS snapshots before and after my commit?
Regards,
Adrian
Hi Jason,
Sorry for the delay. If I'd just hung around 15 mins
:-)
The full path is
/cvsroot/jboss/contrib/jetty/src/main/org/mortbay/jett
/jmx
PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, March 23, 2002 8:34 AM
Subject: Re: [JBoss-dev] CVS locks?
IANACVSE - I am not a CVS expert :-)
It is correct that I can tag later if I keep
CVS snapshots before and after my commit?
Regards,
Adrian
Hi Jason,
Sorry for the delay. If I'd just
- Original Message -
From: Adrian Brock [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, March 23, 2002 8:34 AM
Subject: Re: [JBoss-dev] CVS locks?
IANACVSE - I am not a CVS expert :-)
It is correct that I can tag later if I keep
CVS snapshots before
.
Scott Stark
Chief Technology Officer
JBoss Group, LLC
- Original Message -
From: Adrian Brock [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, March 23, 2002 8:34 AM
Subject: Re: [JBoss-dev] CVS locks?
IANACVSE - I am
]
Sent: Saturday, March 23, 2002 10:11 AM
Subject: Re: [JBoss-dev] CVS locks?
I've got just over 40 source modifications.
Is it acceptable to tag individually using a
non Rel_3_* tag?
I can do the tagging by hand on individual sources.
Alternatively, I could just commit the changes
PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, March 23, 2002 10:11 AM
Subject: Re: [JBoss-dev] CVS locks?
I've got just over 40 source modifications.
Is it acceptable to tag individually using a
non Rel_3_* tag?
I can do the tagging by hand on individual sources.
Alternatively, I could just
Hi,
Is there a problem with locks in cvs? Or is this
deliberate?
I'm trying to tag cvs before committing the jbossmx
integration in case there's a problem.
I've got two people locking jetty/jmx, one is anoncvs.
They've had the lock for over an hour.
Anyway, I'm going to get a couple of hours
Could be a problem, I will look into further. This has happened before.
--jason
Adrian Brock wrote:
Hi,
Is there a problem with locks in cvs? Or is this
deliberate?
I'm trying to tag cvs before committing the jbossmx
integration in case there's a problem.
I've got two people locking
Can you tell me what the full paths are that are locked.
--jason
Adrian Brock wrote:
Hi,
Is there a problem with locks in cvs? Or is this
deliberate?
I'm trying to tag cvs before committing the jbossmx
integration in case there's a problem.
I've got two people locking jetty/jmx, one is
22 matches
Mail list logo
