Re: [JBoss-dev] FW: Busy wait on one thread

2001-06-11 Thread Georg Rehfeld
Hi Bill, I've rewritten EntityInstanceInterceptor a little(see my race condition fix email please) and put it some code so that LOCKING-WAITING isn't printed a zillion times. I also added a Thread.yield() before continue; in the lock-do-while-loop. nice to hear that. I've also started

Re: [JBoss-dev] FW: Busy wait on one thread

2001-06-11 Thread David Jencks
Hi, I like your idea for optimistic locking, however I think generally you need to check that -no- fields have been changed, not just the ones you changed. These are two different behaviors, sometimes you want one and sometimes the other, but I think as a default you are more likely to want the

Re: [JBoss-dev] FW: Busy wait on one thread

2001-06-11 Thread danch
Bill Burke wrote: Marc, I've rewritten EntityInstanceInterceptor a little(see my race condition fix email please) and put it some code so that LOCKING-WAITING isn't printed a zillion times. I also added a Thread.yield() before continue; in the lock-do-while-loop. I've also started

RE: [JBoss-dev] FW: Busy wait on one thread

2001-06-11 Thread Bill Burke
-Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Georg Rehfeld Sent: Monday, June 11, 2001 8:49 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [JBoss-dev] FW: Busy wait on one thread Hi Bill, I've rewritten EntityInstanceInterceptor a little(see my

RE: [JBoss-dev] FW: Busy wait on one thread

2001-06-11 Thread Bill Burke
-Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of marc fleury Sent: Monday, June 11, 2001 11:27 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: [JBoss-dev] FW: Busy wait on one thread let's chill on that one for a couple of days... it is a tricky one

RE: [JBoss-dev] FW: Busy wait on one thread

2001-06-11 Thread marc fleury
] |Subject: RE: [JBoss-dev] FW: Busy wait on one thread | | | | | -Original Message- | From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] | [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of marc | fleury | Sent: Monday, June 11, 2001 11:27 AM | To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] | Subject: RE: [JBoss-dev] FW: Busy wait on one thread | | | let's

RE: [JBoss-dev] FW: Busy wait on one thread

2001-06-11 Thread marc fleury
|So I will make it up to you as I work my way back to coding JBoss 3.0. | |Do put your code in a JBOSS3.0 branch on which I would like to code and I |will review it shortly. | |Can you or someone branch the codebase? Scott Stark just send me an email saying that he will take care of creating the

RE: [JBoss-dev] FW: Busy wait on one thread

2001-06-11 Thread Bill Burke
-Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of marc fleury Sent: Monday, June 11, 2001 12:43 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: [JBoss-dev] FW: Busy wait on one thread I mean chill that it is kind of deep and I want to have a clear

RE: [JBoss-dev] FW: Busy wait on one thread

2001-06-11 Thread Dan Christopherson
On Mon, 11 Jun 2001, Bill Burke wrote: Again, IMHO, these race condition fixes can't wait until JBoss 3.0 since it sounds like 3.0 won't be ready until August/September? I agree with Bill here - the race condition fix really does need to be in 2.4 (maybe even 2.2.x). 3.0 Should get a more

RE: [JBoss-dev] FW: Busy wait on one thread

2001-06-11 Thread marc fleury
|-Original Message- |From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] |[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Dan |Christopherson |Sent: Monday, June 11, 2001 2:01 PM |To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] |Subject: RE: [JBoss-dev] FW: Busy wait on one thread | | |On Mon, 11 Jun 2001, Bill Burke wrote: | | | Again, IMHO

RE: [JBoss-dev] FW: Busy wait on one thread

2001-06-11 Thread Bill Burke
- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of marc fleury Sent: Monday, June 11, 2001 2:33 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: [JBoss-dev] FW: Busy wait on one thread |-Original Message- |From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] |[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Dan

RE: [JBoss-dev] FW: Busy wait on one thread

2001-06-11 Thread marc fleury
| | -Original Message- | From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] | [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of marc | fleury | Sent: Monday, June 11, 2001 2:33 PM | To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] | Subject: RE: [JBoss-dev] FW: Busy wait on one thread | | | | | |-Original Message- | |From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] | |[mailto

RE: [JBoss-dev] FW: Busy wait on one thread

2001-06-11 Thread Bill Burke
-Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of marc fleury Sent: Monday, June 11, 2001 2:33 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: [JBoss-dev] FW: Busy wait on one thread |-Original Message- |From: [EMAIL PROTECTED

[JBoss-dev] FW: Busy wait on one thread

2001-06-10 Thread marc fleury
busy wait problem, see original message below we are on top of it, as of may 10... again vinay, please pay my (due) respects to matt, do say that it is NOT a full busy wait (I.e. n-1 threads go to sleep) but one thread ALWAYS goes through and therefore under high load it can become a problem...

RE: [JBoss-dev] FW: Busy wait on one thread

2001-06-10 Thread Bill Burke
the BMP developers handle the locking. Bill -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of marc fleury Sent: Sunday, June 10, 2001 10:05 PM To: Jboss-Development@Lists. Sourceforge. Net Subject: [JBoss-dev] FW: Busy wait on one thread busy wait