>
> There was also a lot of talk last year around "real men don't use pools,
> they use modern VM technology" and while I don't know where that is at these
> days it will simplify the design so much that I am really tempted..
>
> any religious feelings?
>
You don't mean to get rid of resource poo
marc fleury wrote:
>
> Changing topics,
>
> ok the cache logic to lock the instances is overly complex and frankly
> buggy.
>
> (the buzy wait for example).
>
> One of the reasons for its complexity and some of the complex bugs is that
> we reuse the contexts, I believe one of the very simpl
he frequently used objects for reuse. In libraries,
keep pools of new objects available.
- Original Message -
From: "marc fleury" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Jboss-Development@Lists. Sourceforge. Net"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, June 27, 200
@Lists. Sourceforge. Net
|Subject: [JBoss-dev] Instance pools
|
|
|Changing topics,
|
|ok the cache logic to lock the instances is overly complex and frankly
|buggy.
|
|(the buzy wait for example).
|
|One of the reasons for its complexity and some of the complex bugs is that
|we reuse the contexts
Changing topics,
ok the cache logic to lock the instances is overly complex and frankly
buggy.
(the buzy wait for example).
One of the reasons for its complexity and some of the complex bugs is that
we reuse the contexts, I believe one of the very simple ways to simplify the
design is to BAN re
