For these memory sized phones - I would recommend placing a
Symbian/Java GUI on the phone and use Jboss as the backend.
Thats what I want to do. That's way I say I only want to port some jmx
stuff.
eg. RMI Remote Proxy server.
I don't need transaction or jaas so far. ;-)
it is late in the night 2:50am, but i have the idea: why not embedded
jboss?
-- ejboss --
Bax, since - ejb - oss get sure trouble with sun's marketing office.
FYI: I would join such a project. We need only a jmx port to a nokia phone,
but may be that can help as well.
bye
Stefan
fredagen den 13 december 2002 kl 10.34 skrev Stefan Groschupf:
Bax, since - ejb - oss get sure trouble with sun's marketing office.
After some sleep JBossME sounds really good again.
FYI: I would join such a project. We need only a jmx port to a nokia
phone,
but may be that can help as
What nokia phone ?
6310i its triple band, so it works in Europe and US.
and how many ?
For my at first! ;-)
---
This sf.net email is sponsored by:
With Great Power, Comes Great Responsibility
Learn to use your power at OSDN's High
fredagen den 13 december 2002 kl 17.27 skrev Stefan Groschupf:
What nokia phone ?
6310i its triple band, so it works in Europe and US.
oki - it for 6310i it sez :
Java applications (space for up to 178 kB of Java applications);
note: 128kB of static memory and up to 50 kB of dynamic
whau, great. let us invent a gui.
this is simply bull-shit. explicit and implicit bull-shit.
german: bullenscheisse.
bax
Von: Peter Fagerlund [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Antworten an: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Datum: Sat, 14 Dec 2002 01:56:52 +0100
An: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Betreff: Re: AW: AW: [JBoss-dev
torsdagen den 12 december 2002 kl 00.41 skrev Holger Baxmann:
btw: who is talking about jboss-client?
All I am saying is that there will be many different devices with
different VM's out there soon ... and for us to have a compatible
jboss-client build for each and every one of them is a
torsdagen den 12 december 2002 kl 00.41 skrev Holger Baxmann:
btw: who is talking about jboss-client? i will have clustering across a
whole fabrication line, a whole plant over highspeed i/o ports or
similar
ieee implementations.
Utility Communications Architecture (UCA)
Generic Object
I personally only want one build for the powerful handhelds. If anyone
wants to make the other ones, that would be cool.
-dain
On Thursday, December 12, 2002, at 08:53 AM, Peter Fagerlund wrote:
torsdagen den 12 december 2002 kl 00.41 skrev Holger Baxmann:
btw: who is talking about
torsdagen den 12 december 2002 kl 17.28 skrev Dain Sundstrom:
I personally only want one build for the powerful handhelds.
oki - so We have embedded devices in a range of
- Phones
- PDA's
- SBC (Single Board Computers)
If anyone wants to make the other ones, that would be cool.
yes it
torsdagen den 12 december 2002 kl 16.01 skrev Holger Baxmann:
embedded systems constits normally of many - some 1...k - devices,
clustering comes to my mind ...
Yes - but lets try break embedded down some, to devise's that use a
Mobile Phone Wire and device's using a SBC
torsdagen den 12 december 2002 kl 17.28 skrev Dain Sundstrom:
I personally only want one build for the powerful handhelds.
oki - so We have embedded devices in a range of
- Phones
- PDA's
- SBC (Single Board Computers)
i do not know the structure of this bullet list is, what the
On Thursday, December 12, 2002, at 12:02 PM, Holger Baxmann wrote:
btw: what means 'powerfull'? i have a fpga device here (call it sbc)
which
is able to generate a throughput of 1..2.8 Gbits/sec with rijndael
block
cipher. is this powerfull?
I would define a powerful PDA as any PDA with
torsdagen den 12 december 2002 kl 18.54 skrev Holger Baxmann:
according to the laws - yes, murphys too - the cpu/mem/bandwith problem
doesn't influence the progress of things: it is envolving independend.
what i am talking about is that a jboss-client should run on any
halfway
intelligent
On Thursday, December 12, 2002, at 12:02 PM, Holger Baxmann wrote:
btw: what means 'powerfull'? i have a fpga device here (call it sbc)
which
is able to generate a throughput of 1..2.8 Gbits/sec with rijndael
block
cipher. is this powerfull?
I would define a powerful PDA as any PDA with
torsdagen den 12 december 2002 kl 18.54 skrev Holger Baxmann:
according to the laws - yes, murphys too - the cpu/mem/bandwith problem
doesn't influence the progress of things: it is envolving independend.
what i am talking about is that a jboss-client should run on any
halfway
intelligent
JBossME is maybe not the best project name ? ME being Micro Edition
Maybe JBossEE (Embedded Edition) ? or EMBOSS ?
emboss was being mentioned by marc back in april. but it is an dna
sequencing software name too.
The project should look into investing in DASH-O Pro to compress the
binary
On Thursday, December 12, 2002, at 01:33 PM, Holger Baxmann wrote:
I would define a powerful PDA as any PDA with enough power to run the
current version of WindowCE (handheld version). What I mean are the
IPaq and Zauras, both of which are currently 200 MHz 64 Meg on the low
end currently and
it is late in the night 2:50am, but i have the idea: why not embedded jboss?
-- ejboss --
ok, going fishing some sleep...
bax
JBossME is maybe not the best project name ? ME being Micro Edition
Maybe JBossEE (Embedded Edition) ? or EMBOSS ?
The project should look into investing in DASH-O
Yes - a separated JBossClient project would be clean in diff'ing the
different built's for target'ed device VM's.
JBoss Serving up J2ME is natural without any further coupling ... Then
- *WoW* - when adding jboss-client into the mix - gives - having an
object inside the client *mirroring* the
Once again Peter I have no idea what you mean.
-dain
On Wednesday, December 11, 2002, at 03:42 PM, Peter Fagerlund wrote:
Yes - a separated JBossClient project would be clean in diff'ing the
different built's for target'ed device VM's.
JBoss Serving up J2ME is natural without any further
i understand 'it would be great, but we shouldn't do it.'
bax
Von: Dain Sundstrom [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Antworten an: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Datum: Wed, 11 Dec 2002 16:09:46 -0600
An: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Betreff: Re: [JBoss-dev] JBossME
Once again Peter I have no idea what you mean.
-dain
)
== IEC61850
protocols:
DNP3, IEC870-5 available in the luciol project at sourceforge.net
bax
Von: Holger Baxmann [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Antworten an: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Datum: Thu, 12 Dec 2002 00:14:00 +0100
An: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Betreff: Re: [JBoss-dev] JBossME
i understand 'it would be great
23 matches
Mail list logo
