> 1- we keep the jboss.conf with just the CS/XMLet start
This would allow users to replace these with their own versions? How many
users are interested in doing that? If they are they could extend from
Main, or write there own to add functionality.
> 2- or we force loading the CS from the main
--Original Message-
> From: marc fleury [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Thursday, May 10, 2001 12:22 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: [JBoss-dev] Main.java, let's clean it up
>
>
> The CS works from XML, the jcml files needs that already,
> chicken and egg.
the default MLet mechanism,
marc
|-Original Message-
|From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
|[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
|Schaefer, Andreas
|Sent: Thursday, May 10, 2001 12:51 PM
|To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
|Subject: RE: [JBoss-dev] Main.java, let's clean it up
|
|
|How's
ent: Wednesday, May 09, 2001 5:30 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: [JBoss-dev] Main.java, let's clean it up
>
>
> We could get rid of jboss.conf if we put all the logging and
> ClasspathExtension in jcml with a corresponding xml snippet.
> We would still
&
PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Jason
|Dillon
|Sent: Wednesday, May 09, 2001 7:07 PM
|To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
|Subject: RE: [JBoss-dev] Main.java, let's clean it up
|
|
|Is this going to include merging jboss.conf and jboss.jcml into
|one file (or
|perhaps using a standard jboss.conf from a class resource for
Is this going to include merging jboss.conf and jboss.jcml into one file (or
perhaps using a standard jboss.conf from a class resource for
boot-strapping) or will there still be two files?
--jason
On Wed, 9 May 2001, marc fleury wrote:
>
> |The setting of the security manager and server.policy f
: Monday, May 07, 2001 7:33 PM
|Subject: RE: [JBoss-dev] Main.java, let's clean it up
|
|
|> can you be more specific,
|>
|> do you use it with releases from us (since we don't really release a
|> patchdir...) or do you do it yourself. Please describe
|>
|> marc
|>
|&
|The setting of the security manager and server.policy file are
|better done from
|the command line as many security related events and debugging hooks are
|done on startup of the vm. I don't think these should be set at all from
|within the server. Setting the thread-local mode of the SecurityAs
- Original Message -
From: "marc fleury" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> the security initialization from jboss.properties, we need to move that to a
> proper JMX initialization. Move the thread local security stuff, is it
> there because there is no other way? is there a reason, or can we sa
01 7:33 PM
Subject: RE: [JBoss-dev] Main.java, let's clean it up
> can you be more specific,
>
> do you use it with releases from us (since we don't really release a
> patchdir...) or do you do it yourself. Please describe
>
> marc
>
>
> |-Origina
true,
marc
|-Original Message-
|From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
|[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of danch
|Sent: Monday, May 07, 2001 11:14 PM
|To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
|Subject: Re: [JBoss-dev] Main.java, let's clean it up
|
|
|I've used it to let people try patches for bugfixes
patchdir...) or do you do it yourself. Please describe
>
> marc
>
>
> |-Original Message-
> |From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> |[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of danch
> |Sent: Monday, May 07, 2001 10:27 PM
> |To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> |Subject: Re: [JBoss-dev]
27 PM
|To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
|Subject: Re: [JBoss-dev] Main.java, let's clean it up
|
|
|marc fleury wrote:
|
|> Ok is the patchdir stuff used at all?
|
|I've used that a couple of times.
|
|
|>
|>
|> marc
|>
|> _
|> M
marc fleury wrote:
> Ok is the patchdir stuff used at all?
I've used that a couple of times.
>
>
> marc
>
> _
> Marc Fleury, Ph.D
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> _
>
>
> ___
> Jboss-development mailing list
> [EMAIL PROTECT
Ok is the patchdir stuff used at all?
the security initialization from jboss.properties, we need to move that to a
proper JMX initialization. Move the thread local security stuff, is it
there because there is no other way? is there a reason, or can we safely
work towards putting that in jboss.xm
15 matches
Mail list logo
