formation that spans
> un/re-deployment?
>
> > From: "Alexey Loubyansky" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Date: Wed, 21 Jan 2004 22:21:33 -0600
> > To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Subject: RE: [JBoss-dev] New xmbean desc
gt; Alexey Loubyansky
> Sent: Wednesday, January 21, 2004 8:22 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: [JBoss-dev] New xmbean descriptor schema
>
> From the new XML metadata framework point of view, yes, it is possible.
>
> I'll write a tutorial for this stuff when I am
EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Alexey Loubyansky
Sent: Wednesday, January 21, 2004 8:22 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [JBoss-dev] New xmbean descriptor schema
>From the new XML metadata framework point of view, yes, it is possible.
I'll write a tutorial for this stuff when I
:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Andrew Oliver
Sent: Thursday, January 22, 2004 6:09 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [JBoss-dev] New xmbean descriptor schema
Is there a way with Xmbeans to write configuration information that
spans un/re-deployment
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Juha
Lindfors
Sent: Wednesday, January 21, 2004 2:47 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [JBoss-dev] New xmbean descriptor schema
On Wed, 21 Jan 2004, Scott M Stark wrote:
> Any comments on s
> Is there a way with Xmbeans to write configuration
> information that spans un/re-deployment?
You mean XMBean persistence?
In the sort of writing attributes at undeploy to storage
and retreiving it at redeploy?
Heiko
---
The SF.Net email
Is there a way with Xmbeans to write configuration information that spans
un/re-deployment?
> From: "Alexey Loubyansky" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Date: Wed, 21 Jan 2004 22:21:33 -0600
> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: RE: [JB
EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: [JBoss-dev] New xmbean descriptor schema
>
> I'm thinking of a new version of the XMBean descriptor that
> better allows for externalization of XMBeans. It provides the
> same type of metadata view + the ability to specify how to
> create the mbean
On Wed, 21 Jan 2004, Scott M Stark wrote:
> Any comments on such an extension to the current xmbean metadata?
The only issue with this is the size of the document instance, some
mechanism to attribute the parts with different namespace with an URI
should be considered (when sharing the same serial
I'm thinking of a new version of the XMBean descriptor that better
allows for externalization of XMBeans. It provides the same type
of metadata view + the ability to specify how to create the mbean
resource with a non-default constructor. This would allow for
creation and registration of a XMBean
10 matches
Mail list logo
