[JBoss-dev] RE: microcontainer-head-testsuite Build Failed

2006-05-30 Thread Scott M Stark
For now I'm going to move these prototype test classes into the kernel test source tree as there is not much point to testing them without a kernel. > > I generally duplicate test support classes rather than having > one test depend upon something from another test. > > Let alone dependencies a

[JBoss-dev] RE: microcontainer-head-testsuite Build Failed

2006-05-30 Thread Adrian Brock
On Tue, 2006-05-30 at 10:08 -0500, Scott M Stark wrote: > > > It seem like a jboss-container-test.jar is needed. > > > > > > > I'm not sure what the question is here? > > If you need the jboss-container-test.jar in the MC testsuite, > > you'll need to include it in the classpath in kernel/buil

[JBoss-dev] RE: microcontainer-head-testsuite Build Failed

2006-05-30 Thread Scott M Stark
> > It seem like a jboss-container-test.jar is needed. > > > > I'm not sure what the question is here? > If you need the jboss-container-test.jar in the MC testsuite, > you'll need to include it in the classpath in kernel/build-test.xml > The question is wether a jboss-container-test.jar is w

[JBoss-dev] RE: microcontainer-head-testsuite Build Failed

2006-05-30 Thread Adrian Brock
On Tue, 2006-05-30 at 09:49 -0500, Scott M Stark wrote: > This is complaining about not seeing the test profileservice from the > container module: > > _default:compile-classes: > [mkdir] Created > dir: > /services/cruisecontrol/work/checkout/microcontainer-head-testsuite/kernel/output/class

[JBoss-dev] RE: microcontainer-head-testsuite Build Failed

2006-05-30 Thread Scott M Stark
This is complaining about not seeing the test profileservice from the container module:   _default:compile-classes:    [mkdir] Created dir: /services/cruisecontrol/work/checkout/microcontainer-head-testsuite/kernel/output/classes-tests    [javac] Compiling 167 source files to /services/crui

[JBoss-dev] RE: microcontainer-head-testsuite Build Failed

2006-05-03 Thread Adrian Brock
Not anymore they don't. :-) On Wed, 2006-05-03 at 10:41 -0500, Rajesh Rajasekaran wrote: > The kernel & aop-mc-int build.xml still uses jboss.container.classpath. > > http://cruisecontrol.jboss.com/cc/artifacts/microcontainer-head-testsuite/20060502220252/compile.log > > Buildfile: ../checkout

[JBoss-dev] RE: microcontainer-head-testsuite Build Failed

2006-04-29 Thread Scott M Stark
The next iteration of the profile service is in progress based on a day I spent with Charles going over the admin usecases in more detail. To finish a real prototype the vdf/vfs/classloader need to exist in some form. -Original Message- From: Adrian Brock Sent: Friday, April 28, 2006 6:19

[JBoss-dev] Re: microcontainer-head-testsuite Build Failed

2006-04-28 Thread Adrian Brock
Did I miss the discussion, roadmap, JIRA tasks on this "deployer prototype"? How does this relate to what we've already agreed for the aspectized deployers? i.e. The VDF. The aspectized deployers will be in a separate project *NOT* the Microcontainer which is an IOC container or more accurately