*gives adrian a big hug and kiss*
:-*
Next thing you'll be wanting me to try compiling things first before I
check them in... sheesh.
Adrian Brock wrote:
Congratulations on:
1) Not discussing this change before implementing it.
2) Raising a JIRA task to document it.
3) Porting it to
BTW Adrian,
parody
I did in fact discuss it and no one said much in reply. Perhaps if
you'd read the forum posts more closely, I would not have to repeat
myself here.
/parody
So if it is needed for 5.0 I'll port it there. I think it might be
useful for that profile service thingy. If
It is redundant.
You could always do this by naming your file
something the URLDeploymentScanner ignored then
renaming it.
Rename is an atomic operation on any filesystem.
On Mon, 2006-04-17 at 10:44 -0400, Andrew Oliver wrote:
BTW Adrian,
parody
I did in fact discuss it and no one said
And you were ignored because there must be at least 100
previous threads where it was already discussed.
Including me telling describing how to do it to somebody
who never contributed it back.
On Mon, 2006-04-17 at 10:44 -0400, Andrew Oliver wrote:
BTW Adrian,
parody
I did in fact discuss
Oh cool. Can you repost those threads here? I must have missed them.
Adrian Brock wrote:
And you were ignored because there must be at least 100
previous threads where it was already discussed.
Including me telling describing how to do it to somebody
who never contributed it back.
On Mon,
yucky.
Adrian Brock wrote:
It is redundant.
You could always do this by naming your file
something the URLDeploymentScanner ignored then
renaming it.
Rename is an atomic operation on any filesystem.
On Mon, 2006-04-17 at 10:44 -0400, Andrew Oliver wrote:
BTW Adrian,
parody
I did in fact
Just use this link :-)
www.adriansmemorysearch.org?type=LongTermRetrievalquery=URLDeploymentScanner+Forum+Posts
On Mon, 2006-04-17 at 11:03 -0400, Andrew Oliver wrote:
Oh cool. Can you repost those threads here? I must have missed them.
Adrian Brock wrote:
And you were ignored because
