Re: [JBoss-dev] Re: XDoclet in /tools has BUGSSSSSS

2002-04-18 Thread David Jencks
On 2002.04.18 20:42:20 -0400 Jason Dillon wrote: > I would like to avoid having this namespace setup... can't we just get > xdoclet fixed? Xdoclet just put out a call for help in getting the jboss generation stuff fixed-- remember "Weblogic rules, JBoss sucks! -- that ought to get their attentio

Re: [JBoss-dev] Re: XDoclet in /tools has BUGSSSSSS

2002-04-18 Thread Jason Dillon
I would like to avoid having this namespace setup... can't we just get xdoclet fixed? Or stop using beta features. --jason Andreas Schaefer wrote: >Hi David > >>1. tag your website builds >> > >You mean according to the jboss-all tags ? > >>2. Include the website in the testsuite. >> > >No i

[JBoss-dev] Re: XDoclet in /tools has BUGSSSSSS

2002-04-18 Thread Andreas Schaefer
Hi David > 1. tag your website builds You mean according to the jboss-all tags ? > 2. Include the website in the testsuite. No idea what you mean ? > >From checking out jboss-all, I get the idea that it is all of jboss I have > to worry about when I change things, and I think running build/bu

[JBoss-dev] Re: XDoclet in /tools has BUGSSSSSS

2002-04-18 Thread David Jencks
On 2002.04.18 02:26:53 -0400 Andreas Schaefer wrote: > Hi David > > What shall I do with you ? 1. tag your website builds 2. Include the website in the testsuite. >From checking out jboss-all, I get the idea that it is all of jboss I have to worry about when I change things, and I think runnin