[JBoss-dev] Stateful Session Beans are not EJB2.0 yet

2002-04-16 Thread Stephen Coy
Hi, I raised a bug (#541855) about this a while ago, which has met a distressing amount of silence. In short, stateful session beans fail to passivate if they have EJBLocalObject or EJBLocalHome objects as instance fields. Therefore, they fail to comply with 7.4.1 of the EJB 2.0 spec. I

Re: [JBoss-dev] Stateful Session Beans are not EJB2.0 yet

2002-04-16 Thread Jason Dillon
Any clue why they fail? --jason Quoting Stephen Coy [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Hi, I raised a bug (#541855) about this a while ago, which has met a distressing amount of silence. In short, stateful session beans fail to passivate if they have EJBLocalObject or EJBLocalHome objects as

Re: [JBoss-dev] Stateful Session Beans are not EJB2.0 yet

2002-04-16 Thread Stephen Coy
Because there is not yet any code in place to handle the passivation of these objects. If you look in org.jboss.ejb.plugins.SessionObjectOutputStream you can see that it's only the original EJB1.1 stuff. EJBLocalObject and EJBLocalHome are not serializable, and so must be specially handled

Re: [JBoss-dev] Stateful Session Beans are not EJB2.0 yet

2002-04-16 Thread Stephen Coy
is not marked as serializable... From: Jason Dillon [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Tue, 16 Apr 2002 17:41:19 -0700 To: Stephen Coy [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [JBoss-dev] Stateful Session Beans are not EJB2.0 yet Any clue why they fail? --jason Quoting Stephen Coy [EMAIL

Re: [JBoss-dev] Stateful Session Beans are not EJB2.0 yet

2002-04-16 Thread Jason Dillon
To: Stephen Coy [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [JBoss-dev] Stateful Session Beans are not EJB2.0 yet Any clue why they fail? --jason Quoting Stephen Coy [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Hi, I raised a bug (#541855) about this a while ago, which has met

Re: [JBoss-dev] Stateful Session Beans are not EJB2.0 yet

2002-04-16 Thread Scott M Stark
Coy [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, April 16, 2002 5:23 PM Subject: [JBoss-dev] Stateful Session Beans are not EJB2.0 yet Hi, I raised a bug (#541855) about this a while ago, which has met a distressing amount of silence. In short, stateful session beans fail

Re: [JBoss-dev] Stateful Session Beans are not EJB2.0 yet

2002-04-16 Thread Jason Dillon
: Re: [JBoss-dev] Stateful Session Beans are not EJB2.0 yet Any clue why they fail? --jason Quoting Stephen Coy [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Hi, I raised a bug (#541855) about this a while ago, which has met a distressing amount of silence. In short, stateful session beans

Re: [JBoss-dev] Stateful Session Beans are not EJB2.0 yet

2002-04-16 Thread Hunter Hillegas
I think some part of them is not marked as serializable... From: Jason Dillon [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Tue, 16 Apr 2002 17:41:19 -0700 To: Stephen Coy [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [JBoss-dev] Stateful Session Beans are not EJB2.0 yet Any clue why they fail

Re: [JBoss-dev] Stateful Session Beans are not EJB2.0 yet

2002-04-16 Thread Stephen Coy
Subject: [JBoss-dev] Stateful Session Beans are not EJB2.0 yet Hi, I raised a bug (#541855) about this a while ago, which has met a distressing amount of silence. In short, stateful session beans fail to passivate if they have EJBLocalObject or EJBLocalHome objects as instance fields