David Jencks wrote:
Maybe we're confusing 2 issues here:
1. writing a maintainable usable jboss dtm
2. supporting corba etc.
Does anyone actually use CORBA clients agains JBoss - from Java even,
never mind C++.
I can understand the desire to use CORBA the other way - i.e. calling
out to access
IMO interceptors are much simpilar than hard coded invokers.
--jason
On Tue, 25 Feb 2003, Bill Burke wrote:
What I'm saying is, why add this complication? Do we really need it? KISS.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Hiram
Chirino
Interceptors seem reasonable, as long as there are no hidden costs behind
them. Why not keep them seperated and more flexible? Also allows
invokers to become a little bit simpler. The only down (aside from any
performance client-side class loading issues) are the read code as a
story fluff
